Re: [XeTeX] Polyglossia: Support for romanization of CJK

2011-06-17 Thread Mojca Miklavec
2011/6/16 Ulrike Fischer wrote: > Am Thu, 16 Jun 2011 12:38:57 +0200 schrieb Gerrit: > > >> yes, I thought exactly of such a few words in a western text. >> >> For example, in situations like this: “A town where many hot springs >> (/onsen/) are located is Beppu in Kyūshū. ” >> Here, you have three

Re: [XeTeX] Polyglossia: Support for romanization of CJK

2011-06-17 Thread Arthur Reutenauer
> Pinyin patterns already exist in our repository, so one should be able > to use them out-of-the-box, while for the rest we don't have anything > yet. I have patterns that work for Japanese, I'll send an e-mail about it later; first I have something else to finish ;-) Arthur

Re: [XeTeX] Polyglossia: Support for romanization of CJK

2011-06-17 Thread Pander
On 2011-06-17 16:11, Arthur Reutenauer wrote: >> Pinyin patterns already exist in our repository, so one should be able >> to use them out-of-the-box, while for the rest we don't have anything >> yet. > > I have patterns that work for Japanese, I'll send an e-mail about it > later; first I have

Re: [XeTeX] Polyglossia: Support for romanization of CJK

2011-06-17 Thread Pander
On 2011-06-17 16:17, Pander wrote: > On 2011-06-17 16:11, Arthur Reutenauer wrote: >>> Pinyin patterns already exist in our repository, so one should be able >>> to use them out-of-the-box, while for the rest we don't have anything >>> yet. >> >> I have patterns that work for Japanese, I'll send

Re: [XeTeX] Polyglossia: Support for romanization of CJK

2011-06-17 Thread Andy Lin
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 06:38, Gerrit wrote: > For Japanese and Chinese the advantage is that you have a universal > romanization, You have to be careful with Chinese. In Mandarin, you have Pinyin, but you also have several conflicting romanization schemes in use in Taiwan and older literature. F

[XeTeX] Roman Numerals as stylistic alternatives

2011-06-17 Thread Tobias Schoel
Hi, what is the preferred way of producing roman numerals as stylistic alternatives (while still inputing arabic numerals)? Unicode says, that using the codepoints for roman numerals is deprecated and it seems fair to me, as the meaning is the same. \romand{} works of course, but that will

Re: [XeTeX] Linux Libertine 5 serif too heavy

2011-06-17 Thread Rik
On 2011-06-13 16:38, Sebastian Gerecke wrote: Hi, I tried the new version 5 of the Linux Libertine font. I'm getting a way to heavy serif font. Could someone please check if this a problem with my setup or a real problem? Thanks, Sebastian \documentclass[fontsize=12pt]{scrartcl} \usepackage{fo