Am Thu, 14 Apr 2011 18:37:40 + schrieb Kārlis Repsons:
> One thing confuses me:
> if I install and use Linux Libertine with help of my packaging system (system-
> wide), it gives just about what I desire. System folders have nothing really
> more than the actual fonts and a few collateral fi
Am 15.04.2011 um 01:29 schrieb Dan Drake:
Still pursuing other leads on this part of the weirdity.
Put the word "draft" among the options with which you load a
documentclass. Then you'll find black bars at the right end of over-
full lines. Now you can put these words into a "\showhyphen
On Thursday 14 April 2011 14:31:00 Joke de Buhr wrote:
> I've got the exact same problem but it's a bit worse here:
>
> - I've got a system wide installed libertine font installed via apt
> - A system wide libertine font within texlive 2009 installed via apt
> - A texmf wide libertine font with
On Friday 15 April 2011 07:32:40 Ulrike Fischer wrote:
> Am Thu, 14 Apr 2011 18:37:40 + schrieb Kārlis Repsons:
> >> The case is different for different font formats: pdftex/latex+dvips
> >> still needs type1 fonts. So removing them could be a problem.
> >
> > Those, which live within TeXLive
> This far I used only xelatex and was quite happy with what it can produce, so
> I got curious: what is that pdftex, dvi, ps stuff all for, when there is
> xelatex, and pdf viewers are the most common choice?
Er... because XeTeX was created much later than the formers? Your
question as such
Kārlis Repsons wrote:
This far I used only xelatex and was quite happy with what it can produce, so
I got curious: what is that pdftex, dvi, ps stuff all for, when there is
xelatex, and pdf viewers are the most common choice?
I realize there ought to be a lot of reason for why they exist, but
On Friday 15 April 2011 10:27:29 Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:
> Kārlis Repsons wrote:
> > This far I used only xelatex and was quite happy with what it can
> > produce, so I got curious: what is that pdftex, dvi, ps stuff all for,
> > when there is xelatex, and pdf viewers are the most c
> In very simple words, I must say ! :)
... although Phil drives "a rather dirty black SAAB 9000" ;-) In his
own words!
Arthur
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
On Friday 15 April 2011 10:22:32 Arthur Reutenauer wrote:
> > This far I used only xelatex and was quite happy with what it can
> > produce, so I got curious: what is that pdftex, dvi, ps stuff all for,
> > when there is xelatex, and pdf viewers are the most common choice?
>
> Er... because XeTe
Kārlis Repsons wrote:
I didn't intend asking anyone to remove compatibility. Just looking from the
current perspective and trying to understand why, according to Philip, I drive
a VW Beetle...
No no : /we/ (the existing user base of TeX, PdfTeX, etc., ...) drive
the VW Beetle (or, in my case
On Apr 15, 2011, at 7:03 AM, Kārlis Repsons wrote:
> On Friday 15 April 2011 10:22:32 Arthur Reutenauer wrote:
>>> This far I used only xelatex and was quite happy with what it can
>>> produce, so I got curious: what is that pdftex, dvi, ps stuff all for,
>>> when there is xelatex, and pdf viewer
On Friday 15 April 2011 11:28:02 Alan Munn wrote:
> If you find xetex doing what you want, you have no reasons to change.
Just I wonder what happens when the written material must be printed in a book
(of course with technical side in mind)... Haven't tried ever, but it might be
necessary, so wo
Am Thu, 14 Apr 2011 22:33:37 + schrieb Ahmad Essam:
> Package polyglossia Error:
> The current roman font does not contain the Arabic script!
> Please define \arabicfont with \newfontfamily.
> The code that i used:
>
> \documentclass[a4paper,twoside,headsepline,10pt]{scrbook}
>
> \usepacka
13 matches
Mail list logo
