Am 03.02.2011 um 18:58 schrieb Neal Delmonico:
What is involved in writing a XeTeX TEC file?
In the TECkit sources you can find the documentation and also samples.
(I have them and can send you copies on private notice.)
--
Greetings
Pete
"Klingon function calls do not have 'paramete
Am 04.02.2011 um 03:45 schrieb Richard Cobbe:
To me, it looks like the effects of Script=Devanagari are at least
partly
font-dependent.
Exactly! Adding this option activates the font's particular support
for this script. See the fontspec manual!
--
Greetings
Pete
The most exciting
This works for me (output attached):
\documentclass[10pt,titlepage]{book}
\usepackage{xltxtra}
\usepackage{polyglossia}
\setmainfont{Charis SIL}
\defaultfontfeatures{Mapping=tex-text}
\newfontfamily\textsanskrit[Script=Devanagari,Mapping=RomDev]{Sahadeva}
\begin{document}
Hello world!
\te
Ah, very interesting!
Dominik
On 3 February 2011 08:20, Leo Brouwer wrote:
> I've run Richard's sample (with devamt.ttf, the IBM version of Devanagari
> MT---apparently not an exact equivalent, as it doesn't render "trya"
> correctly), and it appears to me that it's not the fonts, but the lack o
On 4 Feb 2011, at 05:41, Adam Twardoch (List) wrote:
> (Plain XeTeX, not XeLaTeX).
>
> Imagine I use a font which uses contextual alternates such as:
>
>
> \font\samplefont = "Zapfino Extra LT Pro:+calt" at 72bp
>
> \samplefont
>
> \def \sampletext{finality}
> \XeTeXuseglyphmetrics=1
>
> \se
There's the problem. I apparently don't have RomDev.map and tec
installed. Doesn't it come with TeXLive? If not, how do I get it?
On Fri, 04 Feb 2011 04:56:58 -0600, Dominik Wujastyk
wrote:
But I think there's another point. You've gone through some trouble to
convert Velthuis to UTF8
Am 04.02.2011 um 14:39 schrieb Neal Delmonico:
There's the problem. I apparently don't have RomDev.map and tec
installed. Doesn't it come with TeXLive?
No.
If not, how do I get it?
From the internet (via Google). The term somadeva is connected to it.
Last autumn (in December?) it w
All explained on my blog, http://cikitsa.blogspot.com, especially this post:
-
http://cikitsa.blogspot.com/2010/07/how-do-i-install-romdev-mapping-for.html
Best,
Dominik
On 4 February 2011 14:39, Neal Delmonico wrote:
> There's the problem. I apparently don't have RomDev.map and tec in
On 11-02-04 14:27, Jonathan Kew wrote:
> Unfortunately, I don't think there's currently any way to do that. (Well, no
> way within xetex, that is -- you could of course ship the box to the output
> file, then post-process that with a tool of some kind to determine the glyph
> ID, and then re-run
On 11-02-04 18:37, Adam Twardoch (List) wrote:
> So, ideally something like \XeTeXboxbounds would be great: work the same
> way as \XeTeXglyphbounds but for a box (taking 1, 2, 3, 4 as parameter,
> and a box).
Of course, if \XeTeXglyphmetrics=1, \XeTeXboxbounds2 (top) and
\XeTeXboxbounds4 (bottom)
>
> To me, it looks like the effects of Script=Devanagari are at least partly
> font-dependent. With Sanskrit 2003, I need to have the Script setting
> present, or it doesn't bother with conjuncts; it just sticks viramas
> everywhere. Precisely the *opposite* is true with Devanagari MT.
>
> I've
11 matches
Mail list logo
