Re: [XeTeX] Unexplained behavior

2011-01-16 Thread Paul Isambert
Le 15/01/2011 22:44, Bogdan Butnaru a écrit : On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 20:01, Paul Isambert wrote: \thinspace is a \kern, which adapts to the mode it is in. What you want is an horizontal space, but what happens is a vertical one, because the \kern occurs in vertical mode (TeX is between paragra

Re: [XeTeX] strande behavior of Linux Libertine fonts with optio Fractions=On

2011-01-16 Thread mskala
On Thu, 13 Jan 2011, Fr. Michael Gilmary wrote: > > I couldn't find the source code for the OpenType features > > in Latin Modern Roman; > Voilà! > > > > > otfinfo -f lmroman10-regular.otf I'd been hoping for the source code as such - i.e. the *.fea files. Looking at the substitution tables aft

Re: [XeTeX] strande behavior of Linux Libertine fonts with optio Fractions=On

2011-01-16 Thread Khaled Hosny
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 11:09:40AM -0600, msk...@ansuz.sooke.bc.ca wrote: > On Thu, 13 Jan 2011, Fr. Michael Gilmary wrote: > > > I couldn't find the source code for the OpenType features > > > in Latin Modern Roman; > > > Voilà! > > > > > > > otfinfo -f lmroman10-regular.otf > > I'd been hopin

Re: [XeTeX] strande behavior of Linux Libertine fonts with optio Fractions=On

2011-01-16 Thread mskala
On Sun, 16 Jan 2011, Khaled Hosny wrote: > It can be done to some degree, see: > http://talleming.com/2009/10/01/fraction-fever-2/ Looks like it's simply doing fixed-length sequences, with a large fixed length. That may be good enough in practice - who *really* needs to not only typeset fractions

Re: [XeTeX] strande behavior of Linux Libertine fonts with optio Fractions=On

2011-01-16 Thread Tobias Schoel
Why is it even necessary or wanted to typeset vulgar fractions of arbitrary length? Just using "1234/5678" seems to be adequate. That's the usual form in maths when the font size is so small, that \frac{1234}{5678} would be even smaller or disturbing if in the same size. bye Toscho Am 16.01.

Re: [XeTeX] strande behavior of Linux Libertine fonts with optio Fractions=On

2011-01-16 Thread Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd)
Tobias Schoel wrote: Why is it even necessary or wanted to typeset vulgar fractions of arbitrary length? Just using "1234/5678" seems to be adequate. That's the usual form in maths when the font size is so small, that \frac{1234}{5678} would be even smaller or disturbing if in the same size.

Re: [XeTeX] strande behavior of Linux Libertine fonts with optio Fractions=On

2011-01-16 Thread Alexey Kryukov
On Sun, 16 Jan 2011 11:09:40 -0600 (CST) msk...@ansuz.sooke.bc.ca wrote: > I'd been hoping for the source code as such - i.e. the *.fea files. > Looking at the substitution tables after they're compiled into the > *.otf files can be difficult with a complicated feature like > arbitrary-length frac

Re: [XeTeX] strande behavior of Linux Libertine fonts with optio Fractions=On

2011-01-16 Thread Khaled Hosny
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 12:04:33AM +0300, Alexey Kryukov wrote: > On Sun, 16 Jan 2011 11:09:40 -0600 (CST) > msk...@ansuz.sooke.bc.ca wrote: > > > I'd been hoping for the source code as such - i.e. the *.fea files. > > Looking at the substitution tables after they're compiled into the > > *.otf fi