Hi Tobias,
I see where you are coming from.
But, your basic point are here OT. I will mail you off list as
this discussion though interesting is of mcuh interest to this
list that education of students.
regards
Keith.
Am 01.10.2010 um 08:2
hi,
that is correct. but it's also part of the discussion, whom lshort is aimed
at and what role xelatex plays in lshort for that specific reason.
as the discussion seems to have come to the end and a result has been
achieved, i think this thread can be closed.
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Kei
Am 01.10.2010 um 00:49 schrieb Elliott Roper:
>
> On 30 Sep 2010, at 22:52, Keith J. Schultz wrote:
>
>> As far a documentation is concerned look at the LaTeX Companion for packages.
> ..and that's where I get a bit taken aback. The book arrives last Saturday. I
> head for the Index for the bi
Am 30.09.2010 um 18:47 schrieb Michiel Kamermans:
> On 9/30/2010 8:33 AM, Axel Kielhorn wrote:
>>
>> The main problem is that lshort is a latin1 document, thus it is almost
>> impossible (yes, there is arabtex and CJK) to show examples.
>>
>
> well... we are on the xetex mailing list: save
> On page xxvii it says February 2004.
> IIRC XeTeX was first included in TexLive 2007.
> It was MacOS only until a few month earlier.
> LuaTeX was included in 2009.
2008 actually. Not that it changes anything to your point, of course.
Arthur
-
Hi,
I just started using XeTeX again after a several-year gap. I
installed MacTeX 2010 and am having issues with fonts not being found
or not usable. I'm pretty sure this all worked in earlier versions
but I made the mistake of removing my old installation before I
checked that it worke
Am 01.10.2010 um 15:55 schrieb Axel Kielhorn:
Do you have a guide that explains how to turn a pdflatex document
into a xelatex document?
Something like this preamble?
\documentclass[11pt,final]{article}
\usepackage{ifpdf,ifxetex}
\usepackage{graphicx} %[dvipdfmx]
\usepackage[nger
So I've solved the problem with math symbols (found the unicode-math package),
but I've still got this one:
> In addition, on my 10.6 machine, I don't get any bullets in lists; this is
> not a problem on my 10.5 machine.
This is the error I get with the missing bullets:
LaTeX Font Warning: Fo
Are these system wide fonts, accessible to all programs installed, or
fonts in some dir that is supposed to be considered "special" by some
program?
- Mike "Pomax" Kamermans
nihongoresources.com
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, e
On Oct 1, 2010, at 12:15 PM, Nicholas Riley wrote:
> So I've solved the problem with math symbols (found the unicode-math
> package), but I've still got this one:
>
>> In addition, on my 10.6 machine, I don't get any bullets in lists; this is
>> not a problem on my 10.5 machine.
>
>
> This i
On 28/09/2010 00:25, Peter Dyballa wrote:
Update once more and hope that fontspec 2.1a will come!
It is allready in that version...
The command \huge \bf{\sf{Some Text}}}, do not print bold text...
Maybe \bf and \sf are not accessible in xelatex ?
Regards.
--
D.
--
On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 06:47:21PM +0200, Drébon wrote:
> On 28/09/2010 00:25, Peter Dyballa wrote:
> >Update once more and hope that fontspec 2.1a will come!
>
> It is allready in that version...
>
> The command \huge \bf{\sf{Some Text}}}, do not print bold text...
>
> Maybe \bf and \sf are not
On Oct 1, 2010, at 11:47 AM, Drébon wrote:
> On 28/09/2010 00:25, Peter Dyballa wrote:
>> Update once more and hope that fontspec 2.1a will come!
>
> It is allready in that version...
>
> The command \huge \bf{\sf{Some Text}}}, do not print bold text...
>
> Maybe \bf and \sf are not accessible
Khaled Hosny wrote:
Its \textbf{}, \textsf{} etc. (even plain TeX \bf is not a macro but a
font CS and it to be used as {\bf Some Text}).
Sorry Khaled, \bf /is/ a macro :
C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>tex
This is TeX, Version 3.1415926 (Web2C 2010)
**\message {\meaning \bf}
macro
On Oct 1, 2010, at 12:53 PM, Michiel Kamermans wrote:
> Are these system wide fonts, accessible to all programs installed, or fonts
> in some dir that is supposed to be considered "special" by some program?
Goudy is in ~/Library/Fonts and is findable by xdvipdfmx; it's just Goudy Bold
that isn
On Oct 1, 2010, at 1:16 PM, Herbert Schulz wrote:
>> This is the error I get with the missing bullets:
>>
>> LaTeX Font Warning: Font shape `TS1/Goudy(0)/m/n' undefined
>> (Font) using `TS1/cmr/m/n' instead
>> (Font) for symbol `textbullet' on input line 94.
>>
>> For t
On Fri, 1 Oct 2010 17:17:29 -0500, Nicholas Riley
wrote:
> On Oct 1, 2010, at 1:16 PM, Herbert Schulz wrote:
>
>>> This is the error I get with the missing bullets:
>>>
>>> LaTeX Font Warning: Font shape `TS1/Goudy(0)/m/n' undefined
>>> (Font) using `TS1/cmr/m/n' instead
>>> (Font)
On Oct 1, 2010, at 5:22 PM, maxwell wrote:
> Just a guess, but could it be that the font doesn't have that character?
Certainly I see a Goudy bullet under "Repertoire" in Font Book. In
/usr/local/texlive/2010/texmf-dist/fonts/misc/xetex/fontmapping/base/qx-unicode.map
(is this the right file?
On Oct 1, 2010, at 5:43 PM, Nicholas Riley wrote:
>
> LaTeX Font Warning: Font shape `OMS/Cambria(0)/m/n' undefined
> (Font) using `OMS/cmsy/m/n' instead
> (Font) for symbol `textbullet' on input line 96.
>
Howdy,
Again, the font isn't being found. What are the names
Hi Nick, and Adam,
Sent from my iPad
On 02/10/2010, at 8:22 AM, maxwell wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Oct 2010 17:17:29 -0500, Nicholas Riley
> wrote:
>> On Oct 1, 2010, at 1:16 PM, Herbert Schulz wrote:
>>
This is the error I get with the missing bullets:
LaTeX Font Warning: Font shape
On Oct 1, 2010, at 5:17 PM, Nicholas Riley wrote:
> On Oct 1, 2010, at 1:16 PM, Herbert Schulz wrote:
>
>>> This is the error I get with the missing bullets:
>>>
>>> LaTeX Font Warning: Font shape `TS1/Goudy(0)/m/n' undefined
>>> (Font) using `TS1/cmr/m/n' instead
>>> (Font)
On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 10:55:51PM +0100, Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd)
wrote:
>
>
> Khaled Hosny wrote:
>
> >Its \textbf{}, \textsf{} etc. (even plain TeX \bf is not a macro but a
> >font CS and it to be used as {\bf Some Text}).
>
> Sorry Khaled, \bf /is/ a macro :
Of course you are righ
22 matches
Mail list logo
