I used XeLaTeX to create a PDF. One of the fonts (SD-TTSurekh) didn't get
embedded. Presumably this is because its license doesn't allow that. But
how can I tell whether a given font allows embedding without running it
through xetex? In particular, otfinfo doesn't seem to provide the info:
font forge: font information, OS/2 table
- Mike "Pomax" Kamermans
nihongoresources.com
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:
>
>
> Will Robertson wrote:
>
>> I'd write something like
>>
>> \let\oldemph\emph
>> \renewcommand\emph{%
>> \...@rtl \expandafter\aemph \else \expandafter\oldelse \fi
>
> or better still, ... \expandafter \oldemph \fi %!
> ** Phil.
Yes, I'd spotted that
I have not been following this so far but this should not be included in
either polyglossia or fontspec at least for Persian because we use slanted,
italic or what we call Khabideh in Persian.
--
به نام خداوند جان و خرد کزین برتر اندیشه برنگذرد
-
Maxwell, Sorry! quite out of topic, is that Saṃskṛtā Devanāgarī font a
ASCII hack font or Unicode based font ?
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 7:09 PM, maxwell wrote:
> I used XeLaTeX to create a PDF. One of the fonts (SD-TTSurekh) didn't get
> embedded. Presumably this is because its license doesn't
Vafa Khalighi wrote:
> I have not been following this so far but this should not be included in
> either polyglossia or fontspec at least for Persian because we use slanted,
> italic or what we call Khabideh in Persian.
Don't panic! I'm simply planning to provide a package option for a
Syriac pac
Will Robertson wrote:
> It doesn't seem to. In that case I'd write something like
>
> \let\oldemph\emph
> \renewcommand\emph{%
> \...@rtl \expandafter\aemph \else \expandafter\oldelse \fi
> }
I still can't figure out how to do this for \eminnershape as defined in
fixltx2e. Any suggestions how to
On 9/24/2010 11:37 AM, Ujjwol Lamichhane wrote:
Maxwell, Sorry! quite out of topic, is that Saṃskṛtā Devanāgarī font a
ASCII hack font or Unicode based font ?
Now that you mention it, it might be--I didn't pay attention to the date
below. I think the Unicode Devanagari block is pretty old, b
