[XeTeX] ghostscript version

2010-08-28 Thread Mike Maxwell
We're using your pdfpages package to include PDFs into a PDF produced by XeLaTeX. We discovered that ghostscript, which gets used in this process, had a bug in an earlier (c2007) version, which causes it to crash on one of the PDFs that we're including. The work-around is of course to use a m

Re: [XeTeX] ghostscript version

2010-08-28 Thread George N. White III
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 10:01 AM, Mike Maxwell wrote: > We're using your pdfpages package to include PDFs into a PDF produced by > XeLaTeX.  We discovered that ghostscript, which gets used in this process, > had a bug in an earlier (c2007) version, which causes it to crash on one of > the PDFs tha

Re: [XeTeX] embedding fonts

2010-08-28 Thread hh-brasil
It is the wish of the publisher that pdf-documents have their fonts embedded and not only as a subset. This of course shows that they do not understand TeX (where a small error does only need one extra run probably). But nevertheless: the windows program freeFTP.exe does include the full fonts -

Re: [XeTeX] embedding fonts

2010-08-28 Thread Herbert Schulz
On Aug 28, 2010, at 9:03 AM, hh-bra...@bol.com.br wrote: > It is the wish of the publisher that pdf-documents have their fonts embedded > and > not only as a subset. This of course shows that they do not understand TeX > (where a small > error does only need one extra run probably). > > But n

Re: [XeTeX] ghostscript version

2010-08-28 Thread Mike Maxwell
On 8/28/2010 9:56 AM, George N. White III wrote: On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 10:01 AM, Mike Maxwell wrote: So: is there a way to tell xdvipdfmx where to look for the gs executable? Try 'xdvipdfmx -h" which will give you the "-D" option. Then look for the default setting in the config file. On

Re: [XeTeX] embedding fonts

2010-08-28 Thread Michiel Kamermans
On 8/28/2010 7:03 AM, hh-bra...@bol.com.br wrote: It is the wish of the publisher that pdf-documents have their fonts embedded and not only as a subset. This of course shows that they do not understand TeX (where a small error does only need one extra run probably). The publisher can wish

Re: [XeTeX] ghostscript version

2010-08-28 Thread Peter Dyballa
Am 28.08.2010 um 21:13 schrieb Mike Maxwell: But what is this "command line template" the -D option wants? See here: /usr/local/texlive/2010/texmf/dvipdfmx/dvipdfmx.cfg (or /usr/ local/texlive/2010/texmf-dist/doc/latex/cjk/doc/pdfhowto/examples/ dvipdfmx.cfg)! -- Greetings Pete Rain i

Re: [XeTeX] ghostscript version

2010-08-28 Thread Mike Maxwell
On 8/28/2010 6:40 PM, Peter Dyballa wrote: Am 28.08.2010 um 21:13 schrieb Mike Maxwell: But what is this "command line template" the -D option wants? See here: /usr/local/texlive/2010/texmf/dvipdfmx/dvipdfmx.cfg (or /usr/local/texlive/2010/texmf-dist/doc/latex/cjk/doc/pdfhowto/examples/dvipdfm