Hi,
try
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage[osf]{libertine}
\newfontfamily\libertineX[Mapping=tex-text,
RawFeature=+liga% ;+pnum
]{Linux Libertine O}
\begin{document}
A0123456789
{\libertineX
B0123456789
}
A0123456789
\end{document}
tested
Has Thunderbird a way to send a message to this list without usurping
an existing thread? Some users on this list, including me, prefer to
have to clean threads in their eMail applications, so we do not start
a new thread by replying to an old message and erasing the original
subject.
Bec
Am 17.08.2010 um 10:31 schrieb Peter Dyballa:
> Has Thunderbird a way to send a message to this list without usurping an
> existing thread?
Posting a new message (without using the answer function) to xetex@tug.org
should start a new thread.
--
Peter Baker wrote:
…
The various OpenType
features are supposed to do this:
lnum (Lining Numbers) converts oldstyle-height numbers to full-height
tnum (Tabular Numbers) converts proportional-width numbers to fixed-width
pnum (Proportional Numbers) converts fixed-width numbers to
proportional-wi
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 12:15:35AM +0200, Ulrik Vieth wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tested it with both XeLaTeX and LuaLaTeX (both from TL2010 pretest).
> In short, the problem only occurs in XeLaTeX, but not in LuaLaTeX,
> despite using the same macro packages and fonts for both engines.
>
> I do not reall
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 10:37:18AM -0700, Michiel Kamermans wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> just wondering: is there an output driver that will generate an epub
> rather than pdf file from xe(la)tex source? I know it's less precise
> than pdf files in terms of boxing, but epub demand is high, and it
> allows
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 12:05:17AM +0200, Tobias Schoel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as there seems to be only Asana Math and XITS Math as free and
> complete OpenType Math fonts distributed along texlive the following
> question arises for me (as I used to use Linux Libertine as text
> font):
>
> What is a
On 08/17/2010 04:32 PM, Khaled Hosny wrote:
Likely XeTeX does not check this parameter at all and resorts to some
hard coded default rule thickness.
No, that cannot be the reason. I know for sure that XeTeX does load some
(but not all) of the OpenType font parameters and maps them to TeX
fon
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 09:54:00PM +0200, Ulrik Vieth wrote:
> On 08/17/2010 04:32 PM, Khaled Hosny wrote:
> >
> >Likely XeTeX does not check this parameter at all and resorts to some
> >hard coded default rule thickness.
>
> No, that cannot be the reason. I know for sure that XeTeX does load
> so
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 09:54:00PM +0200, Ulrik Vieth wrote:
[...]
> Unfortunately, there seems to be a major conceptual difference
> between XeTeX and LuaTeX here with respect to font loading of OT
> math fonts, which cannot be resolved quickly without major changes
> to the engine.
>
> The most
Khaled,
AFAIK, epup is just a subset of xhtml with a subset of css2, so IMO not a kind
of output format that is very well suited for TeX (well, I hardly consider html
an output format at all, the output is what the browser renders out of it).
True, but CSS uses a box model too, so it sho
On 08/17/2010 10:12 PM, Khaled Hosny wrote:
Hmm, thinking a bit more, this is likely to break legacy math control
sequences that has no equivalent in unicode-math yet, which will
currently just grap a glyph from CM, more seriously, it will break
\overbrace and likes since XeTeX support seems not
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 01:16:02PM -0700, Michiel Kamermans wrote:
> Khaled,
>
> >AFAIK, epup is just a subset of xhtml with a subset of css2, so IMO not a
> >kind of output format that is very well suited for TeX (well, I hardly
> >consider html an output format at all, the output is what the b
Hi Khaled and Michiel,
On 18/08/2010, at 6:58 AM, Khaled Hosny wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 01:16:02PM -0700, Michiel Kamermans wrote:
>> Khaled,
>>
>>> AFAIK, epup is just a subset of xhtml with a subset of css2, so IMO not a
>>> kind of output format that is very well suited for TeX (well
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 08:11:06AM +1000, Ross Moore wrote:
> Hi Khaled and Michiel,
>
> On 18/08/2010, at 6:58 AM, Khaled Hosny wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 01:16:02PM -0700, Michiel Kamermans wrote:
> >> Khaled,
> >>
> >>> AFAIK, epup is just a subset of xhtml with a subset of css2, so
Khaled, Ross,
As I wrote above, if it is about the structural formating, then it does
not worth the trouble, it can be achieved with almost every tool and
document format out there (even office suits can build structured
documents). It is visual, the precise output, where TeX excels which is
tot
Hi Michiel,
On 18/08/2010, at 10:28 AM, Michiel Kamermans wrote:
> Khaled, Ross,
>> This can be useful, however, if one have existing TeX material that need
>> to be processed to other output format, though one can still argue that
>> converting it ones to some sort of XML is much better long te
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 10:48:59AM +1000, Ross Moore wrote:
> Hi Michiel,
>
> On 18/08/2010, at 10:28 AM, Michiel Kamermans wrote:
>
> > Khaled, Ross,
>
> >> This can be useful, however, if one have existing TeX material that need
> >> to be processed to other output format, though one can still
On 2010-08-12 04:54:45 +0930, "Joel C. Salomon"
said:
Using all packages as of TL ’10 pretest.
At one point in my document I needed an optional line-break after a
slash, but
blah blah overfull line UNIX\slash Linux
didn’t break. Inserting the line
\show\slash
showed me that \
On 2010-08-12 16:16:54 +0930, Khaled Hosny
said:
Ah, thank you. Are these features (relatively) new? Rather
embarrassing not to have spotted them, but anyway…
All were introduced in version 2, I think.
Yep, very new.
I've got a problem using these commands. Using XeTeX v0.9995.1
texlive
On 2010-08-17 08:23:15 +0930, Tobias Schoel
said:
\defaultfeatures{Numbers=OldStyle} gives medieval numbers,
\addfontfeature{Numbers=Lining} afterwards keeps medieval numbers.
Minimal Example:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{fontspec}
\defaultfontfeatures{Numbers={OldStyle}}
\setmainfont
21 matches
Mail list logo
