Re: [XeTeX] The arcs package

2018-03-20 Thread Arash Zeini
Thanks, Wilfred. I will look into this. Best wishes, Arash On 17 March 2018 at 11:00, Wilfred van Rooijen wrote: > If your bugfix is simple and without other (potential) side effects, then > you can make a new version of the package incorporating your changes. Add a > description of your chang

Re: [XeTeX] The arcs package

2018-03-17 Thread Wilfred van Rooijen
If your bugfix is simple and without other (potential) side effects, then you can make a new version of the package incorporating your changes. Add a description of your changes to the source code, add a contact address, and make this new version available for everybody. Then upload the package

Re: [XeTeX] The arcs package

2018-03-16 Thread Arash Zeini
I don't have the necessary skills to maintain the code and I was not the one who came up with the modifications. I'd be more than happy to take care of the administrative side of things, if that's possible. Best, Arash On Fri, 16 Mar 2018, 12:54 Wilfred van Rooijen, wrote: > You should "adopt"

Re: [XeTeX] The arcs package

2018-03-16 Thread Wilfred van Rooijen
You should "adopt" the package and become the new maintainer, perhaps. Wilfred On Friday, March 16, 2018 7:33 PM, Arash Zeini wrote: Hi Everyone, A couple of years ago, I raised an issue I had encountered with the arcs package (see below for the complete run of messages). A solution

Re: [XeTeX] The arcs package

2018-03-16 Thread Arash Zeini
Hi Everyone, A couple of years ago, I raised an issue I had encountered with the arcs package (see below for the complete run of messages). A solution was proposed by Michael Sharpe and Joseph Wright wrote that he would mention the issue on c.t.t., as messages to arcs' author bounced. The solution

Re: [XeTeX] The arcs package

2013-08-26 Thread Arash Zeini
Thank you, all, for your feedback. I can wait for the fix to be applied. Joseph: if you hear anything, could you please post it here? Many thanks and best wishes, Arash On 25 August 2013 16:02, Joseph Wright wrote: > On 25/08/2013 16:00, Joseph Wright wrote: > > Nothing to do with XeTeX: it's

Re: [XeTeX] The arcs package

2013-08-25 Thread Joseph Wright
On 25/08/2013 16:00, Joseph Wright wrote: > Nothing to do with XeTeX: it's due to relsize and shows up with a demo > for pdfTeX. Inside arcs.sty you find > > \let \rs@size@warning = \@gobbletwo > \relsize{-10}% > > but in the latest relsize (dated 2013-03-29) \rs@size@warning takes > thre

Re: [XeTeX] The arcs package

2013-08-25 Thread Joseph Wright
On 25/08/2013 15:42, Arash Zeini wrote: > Hello, > > Since the upgrade to TeX Live 2013, the arcs package behaves strangely. It > draws the desired arc under the respective characters, but a string like > "5.0pt" will always precede the characters with the arc. Has anyone else > noticed this probl

Re: [XeTeX] The arcs package

2013-08-25 Thread Michael Sharpe
On Aug 25, 2013, at 7:42 AM, Arash Zeini wrote: > Hello, > > Since the upgrade to TeX Live 2013, the arcs package behaves strangely. It > draws the desired arc under the respective characters, but a string like > "5.0pt" will always precede the characters with the arc. Has anyone else > noti

Re: [XeTeX] The arcs package

2013-08-25 Thread Herbert Schulz
On Aug 25, 2013, at 10:58 AM, Rembrandt Wolpert wrote: > Yes, I can confirm this on MacOS 10.7.5 and up-to-date TL 2013. (It gave > me 6.0pt, just to be slightly different). The same happens when using > lualatex, and also with straight forward latex; so it seems a problem > with the arcs packag

Re: [XeTeX] The arcs package

2013-08-25 Thread François Patte
Le 25/08/2013 17:58, Rembrandt Wolpert a écrit : > Yes, I can confirm this on MacOS 10.7.5 and up-to-date TL 2013. (It gave > me 6.0pt, just to be slightly different). The same happens when using > lualatex, and also with straight forward latex; so it seems a problem > with the arcs package? > > R

Re: [XeTeX] The arcs package

2013-08-25 Thread Arash Zeini
Thanks, Joseph and Rembrandt, for confirming this little bug. On 25 August 2013 16:58, Rembrandt Wolpert wrote: > > Yes, I can confirm this on MacOS 10.7.5 and up-to-date TL 2013. (It gave > me 6.0pt, just to be slightly different). The same happens when using > lualatex, and also with straight f

Re: [XeTeX] The arcs package

2013-08-25 Thread Rembrandt Wolpert
Yes, I can confirm this on MacOS 10.7.5 and up-to-date TL 2013. (It gave me 6.0pt, just to be slightly different). The same happens when using lualatex, and also with straight forward latex; so it seems a problem with the arcs package? Rembrandt On 8/25/13 9:42 AM, Arash Zeini wrote: > Hello, >