On Mon, 13 Jun 2011, Pander wrote:
> And Ubuntu should also switch to these OCRA fonts for ttf-ocr-a? What is
> in there is from 2009 and is credited to
> "Created by Sauter,U-TOWN_HALL\Sauter,S-1-5-21-2526881554-1349 with
> FontForge 1.0 (http://fontforge.sf.net)"
OCR-A is another question. I co
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011, Pander wrote:
> > mark, dotless i and j, and similar code points). The existence of a GSUB
> > table pointing at those points can probably be explained by defaults from
> > the auto-conversion. So in summary, yes, it's a bug in the font.
>
> Could the conversion software gene
On 2011-06-13 14:56, Pander wrote:
> TeX Live list members: see full thread here:
> http://tug.org/pipermail/xetex/2011-June/020681.html for now keep the
> discussion at XeTeX's list.
>
> On 2011-06-13 14:22, msk...@ansuz.sooke.bc.ca wrote:
>> On Mon, 13 Jun 2011, Pander wrote:
>>> TeX Live 2010
>
TeX Live list members: see full thread here:
http://tug.org/pipermail/xetex/2011-June/020681.html for now keep the
discussion at XeTeX's list.
On 2011-06-13 14:22, msk...@ansuz.sooke.bc.ca wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Jun 2011, Pander wrote:
>> TeX Live 2010
>>
>> /usr/local/texlive/2010/texmf-dist/fonts/o
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011, Pander wrote:
> TeX Live 2010
>
> /usr/local/texlive/2010/texmf-dist/fonts/opentype/public/ocr-b-outline/ocrb10.otf
That is Zdeněk Wagner's auto-conversion of Norbert Schwarz's Metafont
source. It doesn't contain f-ligatures no matter what the GSUB table may
say. I took a lo
On 2011-06-13 13:34, Peter Dyballa wrote:
>
> Am 12.06.2011 um 22:26 schrieb Pander:
>
>> I have discovered a problem with ocrb10.otf the ligatures are not workig
>> correctly in xelatex.
>
>
> /usr/local/texlive/2010/texmf-dist/fonts/opentype/public/ocr-b-outline/ocrb10.otf
> *of course* does
Am 12.06.2011 um 22:26 schrieb Pander:
I have discovered a problem with ocrb10.otf the ligatures are not
workig
correctly in xelatex.
/usr/local/texlive/2010/texmf-dist/fonts/opentype/public/ocr-b-outline/
ocrb10.otf *of course* does not have the f* ligatures. (You can check
this easily
On 2011-06-13 01:01, Ross Moore wrote:
> Hello Pander,
>
> On 13/06/2011, at 6:26 AM, Pander wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have discovered a problem with ocrb10.otf the ligatures are not workig
>> correctly in xelatex. ttx from fonttools reports only these common
>> ligatures: ff-ffi-ffl-fi-fl. See
On Jun 12, 2011, at 6:01 PM, Ross Moore wrote:
> Hello Pander,
>
> On 13/06/2011, at 6:26 AM, Pander wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have discovered a problem with ocrb10.otf the ligatures are not workig
>> correctly in xelatex. ttx from fonttools reports only these common
>> ligatures: ff-ffi-ffl
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011, Pander wrote:
> I have discovered a problem with ocrb10.otf the ligatures are not workig
> correctly in xelatex. ttx from fonttools reports only these common
> ligatures: ff-ffi-ffl-fi-fl. See example below for result. How to solve
> this?
Does this font contain ligatures at a
Hello Pander,
On 13/06/2011, at 6:26 AM, Pander wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have discovered a problem with ocrb10.otf the ligatures are not workig
> correctly in xelatex. ttx from fonttools reports only these common
> ligatures: ff-ffi-ffl-fi-fl. See example below for result. How to solve
> this?
Wh
11 matches
Mail list logo