I didnot say it's Nastaleeq-specific, or exclusive to Nastaleeq. But Nastaleeq
is possibly the most relevant script variant that heavily relies on cursive
attachment in OpenType.
Sent from my mobile phone.
On 02.08.2012, at 10:53, Khaled Hosny wrote:
> But that is not Nastaliq specific (Arab
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 10:28:57PM -0400, Mike Maxwell wrote:
> On 8/1/2012 6:48 PM, Khaled Hosny wrote:
> >I remember specifically testing some Nastaliq fonts and Hans fixing some
> >small issues I found, I just tested again now and IranNastaliq seems to
> >work (my fork of Nafees Nastaleeq is bro
But that is not Nastaliq specific (Arabic Typesetting uses cursive
attachments extensively too, my Naskh font uses them occasionally as
well). So, any sufficiently complex font will have issues with such
engines, Nastaliq or not.
Regards,
Khaled
On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 04:40:55AM +0200, Adam Twa
2012/8/2 Keith J. Schultz :
> Hi Again,
>
> I am now trying to grock LuaTeX otfload, that is ContTexts font loading
> system.
> >From what I have understood so far in order get things started is a
> >GDEF-feature
> and GPOS Lookup support in the font.loader and font-otf.lua.
>
> Do you know off h
Hi Again,
I am now trying to grock LuaTeX otfload, that is ContTexts font loading system.
>From what I have understood so far in order get things started is a
>GDEF-feature
and GPOS Lookup support in the font.loader and font-otf.lua.
Do you know off hand, if these features are already implemente
Nastaliq OpenType fonts typically use the GPOS LookupType 3 (cursive
attachment), which is not supported by some of the more simple-minded OpenType
Layout engines.
A.
Sent from my mobile phone.
On 02.08.2012, at 04:28, Mike Maxwell wrote:
> On 8/1/2012 6:48 PM, Khaled Hosny wrote:
>> I remem
