Re: [XeTeX] Footnote rule line without any footnote text material

2012-07-17 Thread Ulrike Fischer
Am Thu, 12 Jul 2012 16:01:19 -0700 schrieb Andy Black: > Pete: > > The attached has hyperref and fancyhdr removed. We still get the > footnotes line on the second page. > > I hope you can find something based on this simpler file. Well as Ross already mentioned: The problem is longtable which

Re: [XeTeX] Footnote rule line without any footnote text material

2012-07-14 Thread Peter Dyballa
Am 13.07.2012 um 01:01 schrieb Andy Black: > I hope you can find something based on this simpler file. Maybe I got it! I think the translation from XML to LaTeX has a fault and it manifests itself in line #95: \penalty1\penalty1\noindent In the case of the cooccurrence of two

Re: [XeTeX] Footnote rule line without any footnote text material

2012-07-14 Thread Peter Dyballa
Am 13.07.2012 um 01:01 schrieb Andy Black: > We still get the footnotes line on the second page. And I can make the line vanish! Just insert \newpage after the "chapter" 1.2 and its introductory text which end with "and the personal endings:", later followed by a longtable. I.e., I put the \ne

Re: [XeTeX] Footnote rule line without any footnote text material

2012-07-13 Thread Peter Dyballa
Am 13.07.2012 um 02:36 schrieb Ross Moore: > This is all pretty-much speculation. I tried to separate the one longtable near the place where the footnote happens in the text – no change. (I also separated all other longtables.) I also have no idea of a specialised \tracing command for this...

Re: [XeTeX] Footnote rule line without any footnote text material

2012-07-12 Thread Ross Moore
Hi Andy, and Peter, On 13/07/2012, at 1:38 AM, Andy Black wrote: > On 7/12/2012 2:29 AM, Peter Dyballa wrote: >> Am 12.07.2012 um 02:02 schrieb Andy Black: >> >> Is it for an almost minimal test case necessary to set up fancyhdr and >> hyperref? > > As you may have guessed, the TeX code is ge

Re: [XeTeX] Footnote rule line without any footnote text material

2012-07-12 Thread Peter Dyballa
Am 12.07.2012 um 17:38 schrieb Andy Black: > I'm not recalling the exact reason why I used MainFont but I do know that the > >\font\MainFont="/font family name/" at /pointsize/pt > > was a way to allow for varying font families and point sizes, including > larger or smaller than the th

Re: [XeTeX] Footnote rule line without any footnote text material

2012-07-12 Thread Andy Black
On 7/12/2012 2:29 AM, Peter Dyballa wrote: Am 12.07.2012 um 02:02 schrieb Andy Black: Try using the attached TeX file now. What is the intention of \begin{MainFont} \end{MainFont} and why are you using \font\MainFont="Times New Roman" at 11pt when you have already s

Re: [XeTeX] Footnote rule line without any footnote text material

2012-07-12 Thread Peter Dyballa
Am 12.07.2012 um 02:02 schrieb Andy Black: > Try using the attached TeX file now. What is the intention of \begin{MainFont} \end{MainFont} and why are you using \font\MainFont="Times New Roman" at 11pt when you have already set "Times New Roman" as your text body's ma

Re: [XeTeX] Footnote rule line without any footnote text material

2012-07-10 Thread Andy Black
Pete: With TL 2012, I do get the same problem you report below. I have no idea why, though. If I use something like \showthe\XLingPaperlistitemindent it gives 10.95pt. which is a number with a valid unit of measure. Any idea what is wrong? I'm stumped. --Andy On 7/9/2012 2:15 PM, Andy B

Re: [XeTeX] Footnote rule line without any footnote text material

2012-07-09 Thread Peter Dyballa
Am 09.07.2012 um 23:15 schrieb Andy Black: > I'm installing TeX Live 2012 now and will try and see what happens. It will be quite similar, the difference between TL '11 and TL '12 is very small at present. -- Greetings Pete <\ _\ O _ |o \ _\\_/-\=' __

Re: [XeTeX] Footnote rule line without any footnote text material

2012-07-09 Thread Andy Black
Pete: Thanks for trying. When I use the file I sent and try using TeX Live 2010, it runs clean and shows the footnote line problem. I do not have TeX Live 2011 and when I went to try and get it, I can only find how to get TeX Live 2012. I'm installing TeX Live 2012 now and will try and see