Re: [XeTeX] Footnote refs

2010-12-21 Thread Fr. Michael Gilmary
Herbert Schulz wrote: Assuming you're using TL2010 try using the realscripts package: replace \usepackage{fontspec} by \usepackage{fontspec, realscripts} in the footnoteproblem.tex file and recompile. The fontspec package in TL2010 needs the realscripts and, possibly, the metalogo package

Re: [XeTeX] Footnote refs

2010-12-21 Thread Herbert Schulz
On Dec 21, 2010, at 11:31 AM, Fr. Michael Gilmary wrote: > Well, I've got some sample files attached for the change of behavior. If you > comment both \input files, then you'll get footnote refs to match the > \setmainfont options (in this case, Numbers={OldStyle, Proportional}). > > If you lo

Re: [XeTeX] Footnote refs

2010-12-21 Thread Fr. Michael Gilmary
Well, I've got some sample files attached for the change of behavior. If you comment both \input files, then you'll get footnote refs to match the \setmainfont options (in this case, Numbers={OldStyle, Proportional}). If you load one or the other input file, you'll see the differences. Linux L

Re: [XeTeX] Footnote refs

2010-12-18 Thread Meho R.
> From: Fr. Michael Gilmary > To: Unicode-based TeX for Mac OS X and other platforms > Sent: Saturday, December 18, 2010 22:19:51 > Subject: Re: [XeTeX] Footnote refs > > Meho R. wrote: > > > You're right about memoir, I got the same result as you did.

Re: [XeTeX] Footnote refs

2010-12-18 Thread Fr. Michael Gilmary
Meho R. wrote: You're right about memoir, I got the same result as you did. After playing a little bit, I redefined separately footnote mark in text and footnote mark in footnotes and it seems that this code is working fine with memoir too Indeed, it works. But why is there an \mbox in the

Re: [XeTeX] Footnote refs

2010-12-18 Thread Meho R.
> From: Fr. Michael Gilmary > To: Unicode-based TeX for Mac OS X and other platforms > Sent: Saturday, December 18, 2010 21:09:44 > Subject: Re: [XeTeX] Footnote refs > > Meho R. wrote: > > > And another shot: >> > > >> \documentclass{article} &

Re: [XeTeX] Footnote refs

2010-12-18 Thread Fr. Michael Gilmary
Meho R. wrote: And another shot: \documentclass{article} Thanks, Meho --- the second one worked. I don't know why the first one didn't. But, strangely, what seems to be the problem is in memoir class! Using, as you did, the article class, it worked. I'll post something over on comp.text.

Re: [XeTeX] Footnote refs

2010-12-18 Thread Meho R.
And another shot: \documentclass{article} \usepackage{fontspec} \setmainfont[Numbers={OldStyle,Proportional}]{Adobe Garamond Pro} \newfontfamily\fnmarkfont{Myriad Pro} \makeatletter \renewcommand...@makefnmark}{% \mbox{\textsuperscript{\fnmarkfo...@thefnmark}}} \makeatother \begin{document}

Re: [XeTeX] Footnote refs

2010-12-18 Thread Meho R.
> From: Fr. Michael Gilmary > To: Unicode-based TeX for Mac OS X and other platforms > Sent: Saturday, December 18, 2010 16:11:53 > Subject: Re: [XeTeX] Footnote refs > > Well, I've got this much working --- > > if I add in the preamble: > > \setmainfont[Num

Re: [XeTeX] Footnote refs

2010-12-18 Thread Fr. Michael Gilmary
Well, I've got this much working --- if I add in the preamble: \setmainfont[Numbers={OldStyle,Proportional}]{Latin Modern Roman} \newfontfamily\fnmarkfont{Latin Modern Roman} \makeatletter \renewcommand...@makefnmark}{{\fnmarkfont\textsuperscript{\@thefnmark}}} \makeatother then the footnote

Re: [XeTeX] Footnote refs

2010-12-16 Thread Fr. Michael Gilmary
BTW, the problem occurs even if you use Latin Modern Roman and specify: \setmainfont[Numbers={OldStyle, Proportional}]{Latin Modern Roman} -- United in adoration of Jesus, fr. michael gilmary, mma Most Holy Trinity Monastery 67 Dugway Road Petersham, MA 01366-9725 www.MaroniteMonks.org