Marvelous! Thanks to all for help - problem solved.
David
Will Robertson wrote:
On 2010-03-16 00:31:10 +1030, David Cottenden
said:
Or are you looking for EMPTY SET, ∅, at U+2205? DIAMETER SIGN, ⌀, is
at U+2300.
The latter is the one that I am after, but I know that my main body font
doesn
On 2010-03-16 00:31:10 +1030, David Cottenden
said:
Or are you looking for EMPTY SET, ∅, at U+2205? DIAMETER SIGN, ⌀, is
at U+2300.
The latter is the one that I am after, but I know that my main body font
doesn't include it. Is there a decent font which does? I'm looking to
match with Chaparr
The LM Roman font contains the diameter sign (U+2300).
--Barry
On 3/15/2010 9:14 AM, Peter Dyballa wrote:
>
> Am 15.03.2010 um 15:01 schrieb David Cottenden:
>
>>> Or are you looking for EMPTY SET, ∅, at U+2205? DIAMETER SIGN, ⌀, is
>>> at U+2300.
>> The latter is the one that I am after, but I k
Am 15.03.2010 um 15:01 schrieb David Cottenden:
Or are you looking for EMPTY SET, ∅, at U+2205? DIAMETER SIGN,
⌀, is at U+2300.
The latter is the one that I am after, but I know that my main body
font doesn't include it. Is there a decent font which does? I'm
looking to match with Chaparra
Peter Dyballa wrote:
Am 15.03.2010 um 12:50 schrieb David Cottenden:
Can anyone tell me how I can get a proper internal diameter symbol
without having to add a whole maths alphabet (which appears to be
what wasysym and mathabx do)? I don't have space for another maths
alphabet!
In which e
Wilfred van Rooijen wrote:
If you would tell us what you mean by "proper internal diameter symbol"
Ah - sorry. It looks a little like the empty set symbol - it can be
accessed by the command \diameter if wasysym is loaded - see the
comprehensive latex symbol list if you're still not sure
Am 15.03.2010 um 12:50 schrieb David Cottenden:
Can anyone tell me how I can get a proper internal diameter symbol
without having to add a whole maths alphabet (which appears to be
what wasysym and mathabx do)? I don't have space for another maths
alphabet!
In which environment or situa
If you would tell us what you mean by "proper internal diameter symbol"
And BTW, what do you mean "I don't have space for another maths alphabet". Is
your document so big that you are actually running into the limits of TeX
memory-settings?
Wilfred
--- On Mon, 15/3/10, David Cottenden wr
