Hi all,
if I remember everything well, /Rotate is a PDF operator that rotates a
page. /AutoRotatePages is a distiller operator. Its value is used when
converting PS to PDF. The idea behind it is that a portrait document may
contain a few landscape pages with tables and/or figures. If rotating is
e
Dear Reinhard,
> Dear Hironobu,
> what do you want to rotate? An included graphic file or the whole
> document?
> Hironobu, can you tell my why xdvipdfmx has to understand /Rotate?
I meant:
"User-intended pdf figure rotation" is suppressed in xdvipdfmx.
That's a big problem.
> And I'm convince
On 2015-11-07 at 09:39:49 +0900, Hironobu Yamashita wrote:
> > ... It would seem, from what Hironobu-san
> > has said, that neither XeTeX not (x)dvipdfm(x) support the /rotate (or
> > /Rotate) primitive that Adobe Acrobat inserts when one asks it to rotate
> > a PDF ...
> >
> > ** Phil.
>
> ... It would seem, from what Hironobu-san
> has said, that neither XeTeX not (x)dvipdfm(x) support the /rotate (or
> /Rotate) primitive that Adobe Acrobat inserts when one asks it to rotate
> a PDF ...
>
> ** Phil.
That's right. And it's not only Adobe Acrobat that inserts /Rotate (uppercase)
i
Dear Reinhard --
Reinhard Kotucha wrote:
> Dear Phil,
> it's important to know that keywords in PostScript are case
> sensitive. The name of the procedure you need in order to rotate
> figures is /rotate (lower case). This is supported by any PostScript
> interpreter.
OK, I was not thinking sp
On 2015-11-05 at 05:46:41 +, Philip Taylor wrote:
> Hironobu-san :
>
> > Philip's problem is pdf inclusion. Current (x)dvipdfmx does not
> > support /Rotate at all, so inclusion of pdf with /Rotate command
> > fails. Yes, Adobe Acrobat (and Preview.app in OS X) adds /Rotate
> > command
Hironobu YAMASHITA wrote:
> I think this may be some kind of faq in SX:
>
> http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/79661/pdfs-included-by-xelatex-are-rotated
>
> http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/66522/xelatex-rotating-my-figures-in-beamer
> I hope some expert of XeTeX can answer more
> But that is probably a question for the XeTeX list, and not relevant to
> the TeX Live discussion here.
I agree. (removed tex-live list from recipient)
Hmm, actually I'm not very familiar with XeTeX, but at least I can say
that pdf is read by both XeTeX and xdvipdfmx independently.
As far as I
Hironobu-san :
> Philip's problem is pdf inclusion. Current (x)dvipdfmx does not support
> /Rotate at all, so inclusion of pdf with /Rotate command fails.
> Yes, Adobe Acrobat (and Preview.app in OS X) adds /Rotate command in PDF
> rotation, so these PDFs are out-of-support by (x)dvipdfmx.
Than
Hi Philip,
2015-11-05 14:03 GMT+09:00 Philip Taylor :
> I don't understand the details of this at all, Akira-san, but would it
> explain why, after I had carefully rotated a PDF figure by 90% in Adobe
> Acrobat, I found that that the rotation was lost when that same
> (rotated) figure was importe
I don't understand the details of this at all, Akira-san, but would it
explain why, after I had carefully rotated a PDF figure by 90% in Adobe
Acrobat, I found that that the rotation was lost when that same
(rotated) figure was imported using XeTeX's \XeTeXpdffile ?
I found had to explicitly rotat
11 matches
Mail list logo
