Am 19.11.2012 um 16:46 schrieb Lucio Crusca:
> Any suggestion welcome, thanks in advance.
provo.tex
Description: Binary data
--
Greetings
Pete
(This space left blank for technical reasons.)
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and L
2012/11/20 Philip TAYLOR :
> Absolutely. All because TeX does not (sadly) have two reference
> points for a box. For this reason in real life situations I use
That's why LaTeX3 has coffins. :-)
Best
Martin
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List
John Was wrote:
These work fine too of course - though I do sometimes find unexpected
(and unwanted) tight interlinear space between \vboxes or \vtops, and
between those and the next (unboxed) bit of text. Sometimes it's not
straightforward to figure out why this is happening and one can get
se them.
John
- Original Message -
From: "Philip TAYLOR"
To: "Unicode-based TeX for Mac OS X and other platforms"
Sent: 20 November 2012 16:19
Subject: Re: [XeTeX] horizontal alignment
John Was wrote:
Hello
I'm not a LaTeX user but I think the standard plain TeX
John Was wrote:
Hello
I'm not a LaTeX user but I think the standard plain TeX commands mostly
work in that environment. Could you not try giving:
\begingroup
\interlinepenalty1
STUFF YOU WANT TO KEEP ON SAME PAGE
\endgroup
If you are going to advocate plain TeX solutions (as would I)
\nopagebreak
Am 20.11.2012 um 17:42 schrieb Lucio Crusca :
> In data martedì 20 novembre 2012 14:05:48, Zdenek Wagner ha scritto:
>> I would go even further. Within minipage LaTeX does a lot of things
>> that are not explained in the user manual, it is necessary to dig into
>> the LaTeX source co
John
- Original Message -
From: "Lucio Crusca"
To: "Unicode-based TeX for Mac OS X and other platforms"
Sent: 20 November 2012 15:42
Subject: Re: [XeTeX] horizontal alignment
In data martedì 20 novembre 2012 14:05:48, Zdenek Wagner ha scritto:
I would go even further. W
In data martedì 20 novembre 2012 14:05:48, Zdenek Wagner ha scritto:
> I would go even further. Within minipage LaTeX does a lot of things
> that are not explained in the user manual, it is necessary to dig into
> the LaTeX source code. among others it handles footnotes so that they
> appear inside
> To understand it you can simply compile the code I attached in the first
> message. It's nearly what I need, except you can see WORDs after TITLEs a bit
> off (about 1mm) their expected placement.
Then my first guess is that's due to additional space added because of
spaces the TeX engine cann
2012/11/20 Peter Dyballa :
>
> Am 20.11.2012 um 13:02 schrieb Lucio Crusca:
>
>> Tried, but the only hint I got is that the problem is caused by something
>> that
>> is actually there but it's invisible...
>
> Then try to
>
> \usepackage{xcolor}
>
> and colorise the boxes to see which one
Am 20.11.2012 um 13:02 schrieb Lucio Crusca:
> Tried, but the only hint I got is that the problem is caused by something
> that
> is actually there but it's invisible...
Then try to
\usepackage{xcolor}
and colorise the boxes to see which one produces which artefact.
The minipage en
Lucio Crusca wrote:
Tried, but the only hint I got is that the problem is caused by something that
is actually there but it's invisible...
Example code will much faciltate effective diagnosis.
Philip Taylor
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List
In data martedì 20 novembre 2012 11:46:42, Peter Dyballa ha scritto:
> Am 19.11.2012 um 15:07 schrieb Lucio Crusca:
> > Any suggestion welcome, thanks in advance.
>
> It's not a problem with the XeTeX engine. If you use the pdfTeX engine you
> get the same results.
No doubts, I never intended to
Am 19.11.2012 um 15:07 schrieb Lucio Crusca:
> Any suggestion welcome, thanks in advance.
It's not a problem with the XeTeX engine. If you use the pdfTeX engine you get
the same results. If you substitute the \makebox with a \framebox you might get
a hint for finding better LaTeX code.
--
Gre
In data martedì 20 novembre 2012 00:45:34, Andy Lin ha scritto:
> I'm not sure I understand the desired layout,
To understand it you can simply compile the code I attached in the first
message. It's nearly what I need, except you can see WORDs after TITLEs a bit
off (about 1mm) their expected p
I'm not sure I understand the desired layout, but why not:
\newcommand{\sessoentry}[1]{\noindent\makebox[4cm][l]{\textbf{#1}}}
\newcommand{\classeentry}[1]{\textbf{#1}}
If the TITLE and WORD are meant to fit on a single line, then this should
be fine.
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Lucio Crus
In data lunedì 19 novembre 2012 18:39:55, Tobias Schoel ha scritto:
> Hello,
>
> I'm not sure if I understood you correctly, but what you want to do
> seems to me to structurally be a table, so you should also tex it that way:
I forgot to specify that there are unforeseeable (at coding time) exce
Hello,
I'm not sure if I understood you correctly, but what you want to do
seems to me to structurally be a table, so you should also tex it that way:
\begin{tabular}{@{}l@{\hspace{5cm}}p{2cm}@{}l@{}}
Title1&&WORD 1\\
&&text in a minipage environment\\
&\multicolumn{2}{l@{}}{that spans exactly}
Hello *,
I'm quite new here, I've been using LaTeX and XeTeX for a while but I'm no
expert. I use texlive 2011 for linux/i386. I'm trying to obtain horizontal
alignment of some words. Let's make an example (look at the following with a
monospaced font):
TITLE1WORD1
Hello *,
I'm quite new here, I've been using LaTeX and XeTeX for a while but I'm no
expert. I use texlive 2011 for linux/i386. I'm trying to obtain horizontal
alignment of some words. Let's make an example (look at the following with a
monospaced font):
TITLE1WORD1
20 matches
Mail list logo
