> Can you please send me your unicode-math files.
> ...
> I just downloaded TeXLive and now it works just fine.
If you still need the files, please let me know!
Thank you for all your hard work on Asana-Math. Making a unicode math
font available is a great contribution.
Dan
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011
I just downloaded TeXLive and now it works just fine.
It seems I had a lot of old files on my system.
A.S.
--
Apostolos Syropoulos
Xanthi, Greece
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailm
It seems to work on my system. I tested both the overbrace and
underbrace commands like this:
\documentclass[a4paper]{article}
\pagestyle{empty}
\usepackage{unicode-math}
\begin{document}
\setmathfont{Asana Math}
\begin{displaymath}
\overbrace{a,\ldots,z}
\underbrace{a,\ldots,z}
\end{displaymath}
>> Today I finally updated my TeXlive installation to
>> * unicode-math version 0.6 (2011sep18)
>> * fontspec version 2.2a (2011sep18)
>> * l3kernel version SVN 2828 (2011sep15)
>>
I have v0.6a of unicode-math and all others are the same but the following code
\doc
Daniel Greenhoe wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Will Robertson wrote:
The next version of unicode-math will, I hope, fix this problem...
(Make sure you also update the packages fontspec and l3kernel as well.)
Today I finally updated my TeXlive installation to
* unicode-math vers
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Will Robertson wrote:
> The next version of unicode-math will, I hope, fix this problem...
> (Make sure you also update the packages fontspec and l3kernel as well.)
Today I finally updated my TeXlive installation to
* unicode-math version 0.6 (2011sep18)
On 2011-09-12 06:24:38 +0930, Daniel Greenhoe
said:
Using \underbrace with the unicode-math package under XeLaTeX produces
garbage output. Here is a minimal example:
\documentclass{book}
\usepackage{unicode-math}
\setmathfont{xits-math.otf}
\begin{document}%
\[ \underbrace{xyz} \]
\end{doc
Hi Phil,
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 7:51 AM, Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd)
wrote:
> Or perhaps there is another way : ... replace the whole
> sequence :
> \XeTeXmathchardef \bracelu = 0 3 "23A7
> ...
Yes, that works great.
\XeTeXmathchardef\bracelu = 0 3 "23A7
\XeTeXmathchardef\bracemu = 0 3
Hi Philip,
Thank you very much for your suggestion. I did try what you said, but
it doesn't fix the problem on my system. I now get three rotated
question marks under the "xyz" and still no underbrace.
My test file and output can be downloaded from here:
http://banyan.cm.nctu.edu.tw/~dgreenhoe/
Sorry, the message became double-spaced (copy-and-paste
from TeXworks) -- I will try a second time.
\documentclass{article} \RequirePackage{amsmath} \RequirePackage{unicode-math}
\setmathfont{xits-math.otf}
\def\midshift#1{
\setbox0=\hbox{#1}\dimen0=\ht0\advance\dimen0by+\dp0\advance\dimen0by-
Daniel Greenhoe wrote:
> Using \underbrace with the unicode-math package under XeLaTeX produces
> garbage output. Here is a minimal example:
>
> \documentclass{book}
> \usepackage{unicode-math}
> \setmathfont{xits-math.otf}
> \begin{document}%
> \[ \underbrace{xyz} \]
> \end{document}%
>
> Usi
Using \underbrace with the unicode-math package under XeLaTeX produces
garbage output. Here is a minimal example:
\documentclass{book}
\usepackage{unicode-math}
\setmathfont{xits-math.otf}
\begin{document}%
\[ \underbrace{xyz} \]
\end{document}%
Using the mathspec package instead of unicode-ma
Using \underbrace with the unicode-math package under XeLaTeX produces
garbage output. Here is a minimal example:
\documentclass{book}
%\usepackage{mathspec} % no problem
\usepackage{unicode-math} % problem
%\setmathfont{lmmath-regular.otf} % |{z}
%\setmathfont{Asana-Mat
13 matches
Mail list logo
