see Joseph's answer:
http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/191675/footnote-moves-up-by-one-par/191686#191686
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Vafa Khalighi wrote:
> Thanks for this bug report. Here is a minimal example, without using bidi
> package where this issue occures
>
>
> \documentclass
Thanks for this bug report. Here is a minimal example, without using bidi
package where this issue occures
\documentclass{report}
\usepackage{zref-abspage}
\makeatletter
\newcounter{footdir@label}
\newtoks\footdir@toks
\newcommand*{\footdir@temp}[3]{%
\@ifdefinable{#1}{%
\let#1#2%
\rene
On 7/15/14, maxwell wrote:
> I'm attaching the minimal file below. The PDF output has a blank line
> between the first and second footnotes, which IMO shouldn't be there. I
> don't get this result if bidi isn't loaded, and with bidi loaded I only
> get this result if the last line of the first f
I have encountered what appears to be a very minor bug in the 2013
version of the bidi package. The sourceforge page for bidi
(http://bidi.sourceforge.net/) appears to have been recently set up, and
as a result the links to source code are not there yet--in particular,
the method for reporting
