Re: [XeTeX] XeTeX 0.9999.0 released (OS X and png)

On 29/03/2013 22:25, Khaled Hosny wrote: > PNG image loading should be fixed now. Confirmed, the latest sources in the git repository load the file fine. Looks like [484b95] fixed it. S -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: htt

Re: [XeTeX] XeTeX 0.9999.0 released (OS X and png)

On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 09:22:13AM +0900, Simon Cozens wrote: > On 14/03/2013 20:56, Simon Cozens wrote: > > OS X packages work beautifully. > > Except that PNG files don't get included in graphicx any more. JPEG is just > fine. Here's the build info: > > Compiled with ICU version 51.1; using 51.

Re: [XeTeX] XeTeX 0.9999.0 released (OS X and png)

2013/3/29 Peter Dyballa : > > Am 29.03.2013 um 13:10 schrieb Zdenek Wagner: > >> Thus I use basically the TL2012 environment and xdvipdfmx from TL 2012. > > You need to run > > sudo fmtutil-sys --byengine xetex > Of course, I did it but forgot to mention it. > The whole procedure you descr

Re: [XeTeX] XeTeX 0.9999.0 released (OS X and png)

Am 29.03.2013 um 13:10 schrieb Zdenek Wagner: > Thus I use basically the TL2012 environment and xdvipdfmx from TL 2012. You need to run sudo fmtutil-sys --byengine xetex The whole procedure you described can be simplified. Rename in /usr/local/texlive/2012/bin/x86_64 xetex and xdvipdf

Re: [XeTeX] XeTeX 0.9999.0 released (OS X and png)

Am 29.03.2013 um 12:55 schrieb Simon Cozens: > ! Unable to load picture or PDF file 'full-logo.png'. How is pdflatex handling the LaTeX file? Do you update TeX Live/Mac TeX with TLU or tlmgr? Which version of Mac OS X are you on? Can you send me that PNG file? How does this LaTeX file work?

Re: [XeTeX] XeTeX 0.9999.0 released (OS X and png)

2013/3/29 Herbert Schulz : > > On Mar 29, 2013, at 6:55 AM, Simon Cozens wrote: > >> On 29/03/2013 19:05, Peter Dyballa wrote: >>> Can you give a minimal example? >> >> sh-3.2$ cat test.tex >> \documentclass{article} >> \usepackage{graphicx} >> \begin{document} >> \includegraphics{full-logo.png} >

Re: [XeTeX] XeTeX 0.9999.0 released (OS X and png)

This is from my run, XeTeX downloaded and compiled yesterday, verified that the PNG is relly displayed in the PDF file: This is XeTeX, Version 3.1415926-2.5-0..1 (TeX Live 2013/dev) (format=xelatex 2013.3.28) 29 MAR 2013 10:36 entering extended mode %&-line parsing enabled. **pngtest.tex (./

Re: [XeTeX] XeTeX 0.9999.0 released (OS X and png)

On Mar 29, 2013, at 6:55 AM, Simon Cozens wrote: > On 29/03/2013 19:05, Peter Dyballa wrote: >> Can you give a minimal example? > > sh-3.2$ cat test.tex > \documentclass{article} > \usepackage{graphicx} > \begin{document} > \includegraphics{full-logo.png} > \end{document} > > sh-3.2$ file ./fu

Re: [XeTeX] XeTeX 0.9999.0 released (OS X and png)

On 29/03/2013 19:05, Peter Dyballa wrote: > Can you give a minimal example? sh-3.2$ cat test.tex \documentclass{article} \usepackage{graphicx} \begin{document} \includegraphics{full-logo.png} \end{document} sh-3.2$ file ./full-logo.png ./full-logo.png: PNG image data, 250 x 71, 8-bit/color RGBA,

Re: [XeTeX] XeTeX 0.9999.0 released (OS X and png)

Am 29.03.2013 um 01:22 schrieb Simon Cozens: > Except that PNG files don't get included in graphicx any more. Can you give a minimal example? > Should there be a libpng in there? No. XeTeX is just including the PNG file as another future "stream" into the XDV output file (included fonts are a

Re: [XeTeX] XeTeX 0.9999.0 released (OS X and png)

On 14/03/2013 20:56, Simon Cozens wrote: > OS X packages work beautifully. Except that PNG files don't get included in graphicx any more. JPEG is just fine. Here's the build info: Compiled with ICU version 51.1; using 51.1 Compiled with zlib version 1.2.7; using 1.2.7 Compiled with FreeType2 vers

Re: [XeTeX] XeTeX 0.9999.0 released

In case anyone else is using Fedora 18, which provides a TeX Live 2013/dev "preview": $ xetex --version XeTeX 3.1415926-2.5-0. (TeX Live 2013/dev) kpathsea version 6.1.1dev Copyright 2012 SIL International and Jonathan Kew. There is NO warranty. Redistribution of this software is covered by t

Re: [XeTeX] XeTeX 0.9999.0 released

2013/3/18 Khaled Hosny : > On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 11:11:18AM +0100, Zdenek Wagner wrote: >> 2013/3/16 Khaled Hosny : >> > Hi, >> > >> > I can not really tell if this is a bug or a feature, bug HarfBuzz >> > normalization is independent of input normalization to technically the >> > input text is n

Re: [XeTeX] XeTeX 0.9999.0 released

On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 11:11:18AM +0100, Zdenek Wagner wrote: > 2013/3/16 Khaled Hosny : > > Hi, > > > > I can not really tell if this is a bug or a feature, bug HarfBuzz > > normalization is independent of input normalization to technically the > > input text is not normalised, but it makes littl

Re: [XeTeX] XeTeX 0.9999.0 released

2013/3/16 Khaled Hosny : > Hi, > > I can not really tell if this is a bug or a feature, bug HarfBuzz > normalization is independent of input normalization to technically the > input text is not normalised, but it makes little difference with the > PDF output. > > If you still think this is an issue

Re: [XeTeX] XeTeX 0.9999.0 released

Hi, I can not really tell if this is a bug or a feature, bug HarfBuzz normalization is independent of input normalization to technically the input text is not normalised, but it makes little difference with the PDF output. If you still think this is an issue, please raise it again on HarfBuzz mai

Re: [XeTeX] XeTeX 0.9999.0 released

2013/3/15 Dohyun Kim : > Hi, > > This new version seems to do unicode normalization (NFC) by default. It was > not the case of previous version of xetex, as far as > \XeTeXinputnormalization=1 is not declared explicitly. > > The new feature (or bug) affects pre-modern Hangul texts typeset with som

Re: [XeTeX] XeTeX 0.9999.0 released

Hi, This new version seems to do unicode normalization (NFC) by default. It was not the case of previous version of xetex, as far as \XeTeXinputnormalization=1 is not declared explicitly. The new feature (or bug) affects pre-modern Hangul texts typeset with some fonts, eg. Malgun Gothic bundled

Re: [XeTeX] XeTeX 0.9999.0 released

On 14/03/2013 22:11, George N. White III wrote: > OS X packages work beautifully. > Which OS X version please? 10.8.2 here. -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex

Re: [XeTeX] XeTeX 0.9999.0 released

Hello. As far as Devanagari script is concerned, everything seems to be correct on Mac OS X with these binaries. With previous versions diacritics were misplaced but it's now fixed. Unfortunately I can't test other Indian scripts because I can't read them fluently, but many people on this list

Re: [XeTeX] XeTeX 0.9999.0 released

What did Achilles wait for before taking over the turtle? Am 14.03.2013 um 17:45 schrieb Barry MacKichan : > Convergence. > > On Mar 14, 2013, at 6:45 AM, Shriramana Sharma wrote: > >> So what are we waiting for for v 1.0? > > > > -- > Subscri

Re: [XeTeX] XeTeX 0.9999.0 released

Convergence. On Mar 14, 2013, at 6:45 AM, Shriramana Sharma wrote: > So what are we waiting for for v 1.0? -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex

Re: [XeTeX] XeTeX 0.9999.0 released

On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 8:56 AM, Simon Cozens wrote: > On 14/03/2013 01:03, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > > The binaries for many platforms (windows excluded at the moment) have > > been submitted to TLContrib now. You can use > > tlmgr --repository http://tlcontrib.metatex.org/2012 update --all > >

Re: [XeTeX] XeTeX 0.9999.0 released

On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 06:15:28PM +0530, Shriramana Sharma wrote: > So what are we waiting for for v 1.0? http://tug.org/pipermail/xetex/2007-March/006057.html :) -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/lis

Re: [XeTeX] XeTeX 0.9999.0 released

So what are we waiting for for v 1.0? -- Shriramana Sharma -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex

Re: [XeTeX] XeTeX 0.9999.0 released

On 14/03/2013 01:03, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > The binaries for many platforms (windows excluded at the moment) have > been submitted to TLContrib now. You can use > tlmgr --repository http://tlcontrib.metatex.org/2012 update --all > for example. OS X packages work beautifully. Thank you very m

Re: [XeTeX] XeTeX 0.9999.0 released

On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 11:42:39AM +0100, Zdenek Wagner wrote: > 2013/3/14 Khaled Hosny : > > On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 07:20:15AM -0300, George N. White III wrote: > >> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 6:49 AM, Zdenek Wagner > >> wrote: > >> > >> > 2013/3/13 Mojca Miklavec : > >> > > On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at

Re: [XeTeX] XeTeX 0.9999.0 released

2013/3/14 Khaled Hosny : > On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 07:20:15AM -0300, George N. White III wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 6:49 AM, Zdenek Wagner >> wrote: >> >> > 2013/3/13 Mojca Miklavec : >> > > On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 7:40 PM, George N. White III wrote: >> > >> On RHEL 5.9, TLContrib packages

Re: [XeTeX] XeTeX 0.9999.0 released

On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 07:20:15AM -0300, George N. White III wrote: > On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 6:49 AM, Zdenek Wagner wrote: > > > 2013/3/13 Mojca Miklavec : > > > On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 7:40 PM, George N. White III wrote: > > >> On RHEL 5.9, TLContrib packages don't work: > > >> > > >> xetex: sy

Re: [XeTeX] XeTeX 0.9999.0 released

On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 6:49 AM, Zdenek Wagner wrote: > 2013/3/13 Mojca Miklavec : > > On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 7:40 PM, George N. White III wrote: > >> On RHEL 5.9, TLContrib packages don't work: > >> > >> xetex: symbol lookup error: xetex: undefined symbol: > _ZGVNSt7collateIwE2idE > >> luatex: /

Re: [XeTeX] XeTeX 0.9999.0 released

2013/3/13 Mojca Miklavec : > On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 7:40 PM, George N. White III wrote: >> On RHEL 5.9, TLContrib packages don't work: >> >> xetex: symbol lookup error: xetex: undefined symbol: _ZGVNSt7collateIwE2idE >> luatex: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.7' not found (required by luatex) >

Re: [XeTeX] XeTeX 0.9999.0 released

On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 7:40 PM, George N. White III wrote: > On RHEL 5.9, TLContrib packages don't work: > > xetex: symbol lookup error: xetex: undefined symbol: _ZGVNSt7collateIwE2idE > luatex: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.7' not found (required by luatex) > luatex: /lib64/libc.so.6: versio

Re: [XeTeX] XeTeX 0.9999.0 released

On RHEL 5.9, TLContrib packages don't work: xetex: symbol lookup error: xetex: undefined symbol: _ZGVNSt7collateIwE2idE luatex: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.7' not found (required by luatex) luatex: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.11' not found (required by luatex) RHEL 5 (GLIBC 2.5) dat

Re: [XeTeX] XeTeX 0.9999.0 released

On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 12:14 AM, Khaled Hosny wrote: > Hi all, > > I have just uploaded a beta release of 0..x series. > > The archive can be downloaded from SourceForge page: > > https://sourceforge.net/projects/xetex/files/source/ > > There have been quite some changes in this releas

Re: [XeTeX] XeTeX 0.9999.0 released

Hi Khaled, Please accept my heartfelt congradulations. This was a huge amount of work and you should be commended! All the best, Chris Yocum On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 01:14:31AM +0200, Khaled Hosny wrote: > Hi all, > > I have just uploaded a beta release of 0..x series. > > The archive can

Re: [XeTeX] XeTeX 0.9999.0 released

 Cool! Keep on the good work!! Best regards, Apostolos -- Apostolos Syropoulos Xanthi, Greece -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex

Re: [XeTeX] XeTeX 0.9999.0 released

Khaled thank you very very much for porting XeTeX to HB-NG, especially for the Graphite 2 support which is sure to be a boon for may people like me! Am presently engrossed in other (related) things but will get around to testing the soonest I can. Many many thanks once again! Shriramana Sharma S

Re: [XeTeX] XeTeX 0.9999.0 released

Congratulations on this exciting release and heartfelt thanks! Dominik -- Dr Dominik Wujastyk Department of South Asia, Tibetan and Buddhist Studies , University of Vienna, Spitalgasse 2-4, Courtyard 2, Entrance 2.1 1090 Vienna, Austria and Adjunct Professor, Division of

[XeTeX] XeTeX 0.9999.0 released

Hi all, I have just uploaded a beta release of 0..x series. The archive can be downloaded from SourceForge page: https://sourceforge.net/projects/xetex/files/source/ There have been quite some changes in this release, and testing is highly appreciated, the more testing the better, b