WARNING: This e-mail has been altered by the NFIT virus/spamfilter. Please see
below for a record of the changes made.
. In case of problems consider contacting the sender or postmas...@nfit.au.dk
---Change report:
An attachment named SetTex.cmd was removed from this document as it
constitu
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 3:10 AM, wrote:
> Sorry for the late answer. Your message was put in the wrong thread
> by my mail program.
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 05:53:38PM +0900, Akira Kakuto wrote:
>> > It seems that the "fontconfig" package is running on Windows.
>> > I have seen that the binarie
Sorry for the late answer. Your message was put in the wrong thread
by my mail program.
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 05:53:38PM +0900, Akira Kakuto wrote:
> > It seems that the "fontconfig" package is running on Windows.
> > I have seen that the binaries (fc-list, fc-cache etc)
> > of fontconfig packag
Am 25.09.2011 um 10:55 schrieb rhin...@postmail.ch:
> Yes I would prefer not to install GFS Didot in the font
> directory of Windows and thus not to use the font service
> for this font.
There are two or three possible options…
You could put the fonts into the same directory as the TeX file.
> It seems that the "fontconfig" package is running on Windows.
> I have seen that the binaries (fc-list, fc-cache etc)
> of fontconfig package are present.
(1)
Please confirm that the fc-cache.exe is the one provided by
TeX Live, that is, it is in the TeX Live binary directory .../bin/win32.
The
Am Sat, 24 Sep 2011 21:20:22 +0200 schrieb
rhin...@postmail.ch:
> Hi All,
> When using xelatex and fontspec (from updated TeXLive 2011)
> and specifying font by file name under Windows,
> The font cannot be loaded and a strange error message
> saying the name contains a blank is displayed.
> If t
Am 25.09.2011 um 10:55 schrieb rhin...@postmail.ch:
> Is this solution possible under Windows ? How to implement it ?
I prefer not to use MS Windows privately. (The setup for fontconfig is
documented, some .CNF files already exist in the distribution.)
--
Greetings
Thanks for repying me.
Yes I would prefer not to install GFS Didot in the font
directory of Windows and thus not to use the font service
for this font.
The reason behind that is that I want to build a portable
distribution to be runnable from an USB key.
This key should be usable on a machine w
Am 24.09.2011 um 21:20 schrieb rhin...@postmail.ch:
> \fontspec[%
>Extension=.otf,
>UprightFont = *,
>BoldFont=*Bold,
>ItalicFont=*Italic,
>BoldItalicFont=*BoldItalic]{GFSDidot}
With XeTeX you certainly don't need this block.
I could get your result onl
OK with TeX Live 2010.
Philip Taylor
rhin...@postmail.ch wrote:
> \documentclass[12pt,draft]{article}
>
> \usepackage{iftex}
> \usepackage{fontspec}
>\ifXeTeX
> %Traitement des ligatures classiques de TeX
> \defaultfontfeatures{Mapping=tex-text}
>\else
> %LuaTeX
Hi All,
When using xelatex and fontspec (from updated TeXLive 2011)
and specifying font by file name under Windows,
The font cannot be loaded and a strange error message
saying the name contains a blank is displayed.
The error message displayed in DOS command windows is:
(c:/texlive/2011/texm
11 matches
Mail list logo
