I see dots on Skim and Preview views.
—Barry
On 16 Jun 2014, at 15:04, Marcin Woliński wrote:
Dnia 2014-06-16, pon o godzinie 06:34 -0500, Herbert Schulz pisze:
Howdy,
I'm using TeX Live 2014 (from the pretest) on a Mac and don't see
that black dot (unless it's awfully small). Could it
Convergence.
On Mar 14, 2013, at 6:45 AM, Shriramana Sharma wrote:
> So what are we waiting for for v 1.0?
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
Would it work for you to use the crop package? It will center the page if you
give it the paper size.
--Barry
>> Using the geometry package, is there any way to automatically (without
>> using layouthoffset and layoutvoffset) to center a layout area on a
>> physical page?
---
Sorry for the superfluous post. My mail program finally updated the XeTeX
postings just after I hit the send key :-(
--Barry
On Sep 21, 2011, at 1:19 PM, Barry MacKichan wrote:
> If I compile the following:
>
> \documentclass{article}
> \usepackage{fontspec}
> \usepack
If I compile the following:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{fontspec}
\usepackage{polyglossia}
\begin{document}
This is some text.
\end{document}
I get the errors at the end of this message. I updated my TexLive 2011 complete
installation this morning.
--Barry
This is XeTeX, Version 3.1415
elete key, as I recall, was
opaque tape that you could stick on the paper tape.
--Barry MacKichan
On Sep 12, 2011, at 2:53 PM, maxwell wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 21:40:57 +0200, Tobias Schoel
> wrote:
>> Shouldn't real dinosaurs (real as in MTV Real Life) calculate usin
I could sell you my abacus ...
--Barry
On Jun 23, 2011, at 12:44 PM, Peter Baker wrote:
> These computers have gotten too darn complicated, I say!
>
> Peter
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listi
Sorry about the 'spam'. I neglected to scroll my mail window and incorrectly
concluded that this point had not been made yet.
--Barry
On Jun 6, 2011, at 10:15 AM, Barry MacKichan wrote:
> In Fontspec.pdf, p. 16:
>
> Transparency is supported
> by LuaLATEXand by X E
In Fontspec.pdf, p. 16:
Transparency is supported
by LuaLATEXand by X ELATEX with the xdv2pdf driver (Mac OS X only); X ELATEX
with
the xdvipdfmx driver does not support this feature.
--Barry
On Jun 5, 2011, at 8:33 AM, Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:
> YES :-))) Finally it works. A
Weren't these called 'code pages'?
--Barry
On 10/21/10 4:29 AM, Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:
Tobias Schoel wrote:
That's difficult, because languages and scripture are evolving. Is there
a difference between Montenegrin and Serbian? Will there be a difference
for German German an
Try (I used Courier instead of Pro Typewriter Underwood, but it should
be about the same):
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{fontspec}
\setmonofont[WordSpace={1.0,0.0,0.0}]{Courier}
\begin{document}
\noindent
\frenchspacing
\texttt{123456789012345678901234567890\\
x. xx. xx. xx. xx. xx
Microsoft's recommendations on the UI of programs are only
recommendations. If the task requires it, two windows are fine. This is
what you would have if you previewed in Acrobat Reader anyway -- two
apps but also two windows.
It's been a while, but my memory is that many of Adobe's apps, suc
Since xetex uses fontcache, a extra benefit for Windows users is that
they now have a version. By default it looks at the Windows font
directory among others.
--Barry
On 8/29/2010 3:39 PM, Grzegorz Murzynowski wrote:
> W dniu 29.08.2010 19:18, Barry MacKichan pisze:
>> Some variation
Some variation of
fc-list "Myriad Pro" > somefile
should get you a file you can run a test on.
--Barry macKichan
On 8/29/2010 10:56 AM, Alan Munn wrote:
>
> On Aug 29, 2010, at 12:24 PM, Michiel Kamermans wrote:
>
>> Hi Alan,
>>
>>> Is there a
outine has become very complex with the addition of calling on OpenType
to compute sizes of text chunks, but it seems to me that the changes are
solidly on the XeTeX side of the XeTeX/xdvipdfmx divide.
--Barry
On 5/3/2010 4:41 AM, Martin Schröder wrote:
> 2010/5/3 Barry MacKichan :
>
>
done, everybody should switch over to XeTeX.
At the current time, I can only recommend that 98% of the people should
switch over to XeTeX.
--Barry MacKichan
On 5/2/2010 5:12 PM, Jonathan Kew wrote:
> For those who like to live on the cutting (bleeding?) edge, there is a new
> version of
The LM Roman font contains the diameter sign (U+2300).
--Barry
On 3/15/2010 9:14 AM, Peter Dyballa wrote:
>
> Am 15.03.2010 um 15:01 schrieb David Cottenden:
>
>>> Or are you looking for EMPTY SET, ∅, at U+2205? DIAMETER SIGN, ⌀, is
>>> at U+2300.
>> The latter is the one that I am after, but I k
17 matches
Mail list logo
