2013/1/15 Hans Schmidt :
> Am 14.01.2013 22:53, schrieb Jérôme Étévé:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> There's a pretty good post here that describes a simple method to fallback
>> to
>> CJK fonts even when they're mixed with roman text.
>>
>> http://latex-my.blogspot.co.uk/2012/06/more-ways-to-typeset-cjk.html
>>
>
Am 14.01.2013 22:53, schrieb Jérôme Étévé:
Hi,
There's a pretty good post here that describes a simple method to fallback to
CJK fonts even when they're mixed with roman text.
http://latex-my.blogspot.co.uk/2012/06/more-ways-to-typeset-cjk.html
Cheers,
Jerome.
Hello,
Thanks for the help. A
If you can't wait, the TECkit mapping will work regardless of your XeTeX
version.
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Khaled Hosny wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 09:13:12AM -0500, Mike Maxwell wrote:
> > On 1/15/2013 12:58 AM, Khaled Hosny wrote:
> > >BTW, next XeTeX (thanks the new HarfBuzz lay
2013/1/15 Khaled Hosny :
> We don't usually make separate releases, so, unless you are welling to
> build from git[1], the answer is yes.
There's always tlcontrib. :-)
Best
Martin
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 09:13:12AM -0500, Mike Maxwell wrote:
> On 1/15/2013 12:58 AM, Khaled Hosny wrote:
> >BTW, next XeTeX (thanks the new HarfBuzz layout engine), will try to
> >position the accents using their bounding boxes if the font does not
> >have a GPOS table, so it should produce bette
On 1/15/2013 12:58 AM, Khaled Hosny wrote:
BTW, next XeTeX (thanks the new HarfBuzz layout engine), will try to
position the accents using their bounding boxes if the font does not
have a GPOS table, so it should produce better results in this case
(unless the font in question does have a GPOS ta
