On 08.12.2011 05:59, Daniel Greenhoe wrote:
2011/12/8 Zdenek Wagner:
No, I do not agree. I can only agree that the LaTeX user
documentatioin is incomplete. ...
Without knowledge of the
modes you cannot understand why the table behaves differently in the
footnote. It is documented in the TeXbook.
Or... you could use context. I've never used context, but I hear good
things about it.
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 22:59, Daniel Greenhoe wrote:
> 2011/12/8 Zdenek Wagner :
>> No, I do not agree. I can only agree that the LaTeX user
>> documentatioin is incomplete. ...
>> Without knowledge of the
>> m
2011/12/8 Zdenek Wagner :
> No, I do not agree. I can only agree that the LaTeX user
> documentatioin is incomplete. ...
> Without knowledge of the
> modes you cannot understand why the table behaves differently in the
> footnote. It is documented in the TeXbook.
Then if that is the current state
2011/12/8 Daniel Greenhoe :
> Hello Heiko,
> ...
> In my mind (and maybe in my mind only) if I code something (e.g. a
> tabular in a footnote) in accordance with documented syntax and then
> the result of that code violates a parameter (e.g. a lower text area
> boundary) defined in the same documen
Hello Heiko,
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 7:51 AM, Heiko Oberdiek
wrote:
> I have seen two problems with your example and one of them solved,
> the other remained unsolved. No more, no less.
Yes, that misunderstanding was my fault.
> Taking more time, I see now, that the overfull \vbox is caused
> by
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 01:40, Keith J. Schultz
wrote:> Anyway, after that he loads babel! I am almost sure first load
font spec, polyglossia and then babel is> likely to cause some weird
side effects.
Yeah, it's really easy to miss package conflicts when using LyX. I
actually started using LaTeX t
