On 10/5/2010 3:15 PM, Khaled Hosny wrote:
Make sure you don't have to different versions of "MS Mincho" font
accessible to XeTeX (possiply in different formats) as this is known to
cause this kind of issues.
Indeed. For some reason there's was TTC as well as a TTF for it... TTF
deleted, co
You can take a look at the gb4e package (or its predecessor
covington). It was designed for glosses in linguistics, but the
mechanism might suit your needs. It takes up to 3 lines of input,
reads the first word (or group) of each line, puts those in a box,
then reads the next word and puts those in
Replace the ISO-8859-7 characters with utf-8 and see what happens.
On Tuesday 05 October 2010, Nikos Platis wrote:
> Consider the following minimal file:
>
> ---
> \documentclass[a4paper,10pt]{article}
> \usepackage{fontspec}
> \setmainfont{Candara}
> \begin{document}
> ά ΠΠΠή Î Î
Hi Will,
See the attached. This is a version of a file that I had on my machine
upstate (I kept the preamble, just removed the actual text). This file
would not compile last weekend, giving me the same errors that I encountered
while working on my big book project.
It compiles on my machin
Am 05.10.2010 um 11:59 schrieb Nikos Platis:
> Consider the following minimal file:
>
> ---
> \documentclass[a4paper,10pt]{article}
> \usepackage{fontspec}
> \setmainfont{Candara}
> \begin{document}
> ά Ά έ Έ ή Ή ί Ί ϊ Ϊ ΐ ό Ό ύ Ύ ϋ Ϋ ΰ ώ Ώ
> \end{document}
> ---
>
> Using a ful
On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 02:15:42PM -0700, Michiel Kamermans wrote:
> I tried updating to MiKTeX 2.9 beta, to see if that solved the
> problem - everything now at least resolves to the right location,
> but fontspec is exhibiting a different problem. Take the following
> UTF-8 encoded .tex file:
>
I tried updating to MiKTeX 2.9 beta, to see if that solved the problem -
everything now at least resolves to the right location, but fontspec is
exhibiting a different problem. Take the following UTF-8 encoded .tex file:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{fontspec}
\setmainfont{MS Mincho}
\beg
On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 10:51:21PM +0200, Roland Kuhn wrote:
> Am 05.10.2010 22:41, schrieb Khaled Hosny:
> >On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 10:32:51PM +0200, Roland Kuhn wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >>a few days back I asked about a problem with optical font sizes: for
> >>me, the correct fonts are not automa
Am 05.10.2010 22:41, schrieb Khaled Hosny:
On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 10:32:51PM +0200, Roland Kuhn wrote:
Hi,
a few days back I asked about a problem with optical font sizes: for
me, the correct fonts are not automatically selected. I can rule out
a fontspec bug, since the problem exists also
On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 10:32:51PM +0200, Roland Kuhn wrote:
> Hi,
>
> a few days back I asked about a problem with optical font sizes: for
> me, the correct fonts are not automatically selected. I can rule out
> a fontspec bug, since the problem exists also in plain XeTeX:
>
> \font\1="Kepler S
Hi,
a few days back I asked about a problem with optical font sizes: for me,
the correct fonts are not automatically selected. I can rule out a
fontspec bug, since the problem exists also in plain XeTeX:
\font\1="Kepler Std" at 9pt\1
Hallo Welt!
\font\2="Kepler Std" at 12pt\2
Hallo Welt!
\fo
Thanks Will and Khaled for explaining the problem. Kamal
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 04:12, Khaled Hosny wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 06:37:07PM -0400, Kamal Abdali wrote:
> > Here's a related problem.
> >
> > The math symbols in XITS seem rather small.
>
> Because you are using the text font; XI
On Tue, 05 Oct 2010 16:53:44 +0200
Tobias Schoel wrote:
> I can confirm this behaviour. Linux Libertine works ok. This seems to
> be a font bug.
I believe this is not a bug but rather the intended behavior. Since
Greek accented capitals are normally used only in titlecase, some font
designers map
On Tue, 5 Oct 2010 Peter Dyballa wrote:
> Am 05.10.2010 um 12:46 schrieb Dominik Wujastyk:
>
>> This is completely wrong, and anachronistic. SGML was born long
>> after TeX
>> and LaTeX.
>
> You probably mean that ISO standard on SGML from 1986 (8879). There is
> none for any TeX dialect...
>
Am 05.10.2010 um 12:46 schrieb Dominik Wujastyk:
This is completely wrong, and anachronistic. SGML was born long
after TeX
and LaTeX.
You probably mean that ISO standard on SGML from 1986 (8879). There is
none for any TeX dialect...
William W. Tunnicliffe had the idea of SGML at least
I can confirm this behaviour. Linux Libertine works ok. This seems to be
a font bug.
Am 05.10.2010 11:59, schrieb Nikos Platis:
Consider the following minimal file:
---
\documentclass[a4paper,10pt]{article}
\usepackage{fontspec}
\setmainfont{Candara}
\begin{document}
ά Ά έ Έ ή Ή ί Ί ϊ
Ross Moore wrote:
There is a big compatibility problem with this package, which really
should be fixed before it gets distributed widely.
The choices of some of the macro-names are rather unfortunate,
since they clash with existing, long-standing uses for those names.
I would suggest chang
Hi,
just updated MiKTeX 2.8, and then tries to download it from repository
location tex/xetex/fontspec - it doesn't see it there, and then tries to
download it from an online repository. However, fontspec is now located
in tex/latex/fontspec... is this a problem with MiKTeX or is it a
problem
On 4 October 2010 12:25, Keith J. Schultz wrote:
>
>TeX was developed as a subset of SGML or if you wish clone, variant,
> etc.
>
This is completely wrong, and anachronistic. SGML was born long after TeX
and LaTeX.
It is true that LaTeX's syntax owes a debt to Scribe (as Lamport says
so
Consider the following minimal file:
---
\documentclass[a4paper,10pt]{article}
\usepackage{fontspec}
\setmainfont{Candara}
\begin{document}
ά Ά έ Έ ή Ή ί Ί ϊ Ϊ ΐ ό Ό ύ Ύ ϋ Ϋ ΰ ώ Ώ
\end{document}
---
Using a fully updated TL2010 it produces the following, obviously wrong, output:
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 06:37:07PM -0400, Kamal Abdali wrote:
> Here's a related problem.
>
> The math symbols in XITS seem rather small.
Because you are using the text font; XITS, not the math font; XITS Math,
the former will give you primes that are suitable for text since they
are already redu
21 matches
Mail list logo
