On 07/08/2010 23:32, Ross Moore wrote:
Hi Peter, Sebastien,
On 08/08/2010, at 7:33 AM, Peter Dyballa
wrote:
Am 07.08.2010 um 22:44 schrieb Sebastian Gerecke:
BUT: This just has to be an utter hack and I can not believe it
is the way it is supposed to be done.
This hack is necessary becau
Hi Peter, Sebastien,
On 08/08/2010, at 7:33 AM, Peter Dyballa wrote:
>
> Am 07.08.2010 um 22:44 schrieb Sebastian Gerecke:
>
>> BUT: This just has to be an utter hack and I can not believe it is the way it
>> is supposed to be done.
>
> This hack is necessary because mhchem is not aware of f
Am 07.08.2010 um 22:44 schrieb Sebastian Gerecke:
BUT: This just has to be an utter hack and I can not believe it is
the way it
is supposed to be done.
This hack is necessary because mhchem is not aware of font features,
it's a simple LaTeX package that maltreats simple TeX fonts in the
Am 07.08.2010 um 12:27 schrieb Sebastian Gerecke:
the colored ^{14}_{6}C example in the middle
I think with simply using the Linux Libertine O font you won't
reproduce this, because mhchem is using \ensuremath, its documentation
also mentions math mode. So just smaller sized glyphs from
For anyone who is interested and might have the same problem
The solution looks like this:
\begin{document}
\font\up="Linux Libertine O:+sups,script=latn,language=DEU"
\font\down="Linux Libertine O:+sinf,script=latn,language=DEU"
\ce{^{\down 14}_{\up 6}C}
\end{document}
That produces the desire
Since this has to do with the box alignment of sub/super script, I'm
fairly certain this has nothing to do with fontspec at all. Instead,
let's just write our own macro for isotopes:
\documentclass{minimal}
\usepackage{fontspec}
\setmainfont{Linux Libertine O}
% align by adding phantom text an
Am 07.08.2010 um 20:55 schrieb Khaled Hosny:
And when you additionally use
\defaultfontfeatures{Mapping=tex-text}
instead?
Sorry, but I fail to see how "Mapping=tex-text" would make any
difference here.
Does it help you when I cite the original line?
\defaultfontfeatures{
Am Samstag 07 August 2010, 20:35:54 schrieb Peter Dyballa:
> And when you additionally use
>
> \defaultfontfeatures{Mapping=tex-text}
>
> instead?
Hi Peter,
that does not make a difference, either.
I do use that setting, but since it only does what Khaled explained I stripped
it out of
On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 08:35:54PM +0200, Peter Dyballa wrote:
>
> Am 07.08.2010 um 13:49 schrieb Sebastian Gerecke:
>
> >No, that does not help.
>
>
> And when you additionally use
>
> \defaultfontfeatures{Mapping=tex-text}
>
> instead?
Sorry, but I fail to see how "Mapping=tex-text"
Am 07.08.2010 um 13:49 schrieb Sebastian Gerecke:
No, that does not help.
And when you additionally use
\defaultfontfeatures{Mapping=tex-text}
instead?
--
Mit friedvollen Grüßen
Pete
Vielfalt im Regal statt Einfalt im Hirn!
-
Am Samstag 07 August 2010, 13:22:49 schrieb Peter Dyballa:
> Does this work better:
>
> \usepackage{fontspec,xltxtra}
No, that does not help.
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
Am 07.08.2010 um 12:27 schrieb Sebastian Gerecke:
\usepackage{fontspec}
Does this work better:
\usepackage{fontspec,xltxtra}
--
Mit friedvollen Grüßen
Pete
Wer nichts zu verbergen hat, hat schon alles verloren.
(Juli Zeh)
Dear all,
for a document I am preparing I want something like this:
http://www.linuxlibertine.org/index.php?id=87&L=1 (the colored ^{14}_{6}C
example in the middle}. Unfortunately I don't get it to work using Linux
Libertine and TL2010PT xelatex. Though the Libertine documentation is fairly
com
13 matches
Mail list logo
