om different domains on siblings, don't we? In
> > order to avoid leaks between guests, I mean.
>
> Ideally, we'd want all of these. I expect the only reasonable way to
> develop them is one on top of another.
If there was a vote, I'd place the scheduler changes
86-64 targets. This improves generated PIC code
performance as more hard registers can be used. Shared libraries can
significantly benefit from this optimization. Currently it is switched
on only for x86/x86-64 targets. As RA infrastructure is already
im
