Re: v5.4.289 failed to boot with error megasas_build_io_fusion 3219 sge_count (-12) is out of range

Hi there, On 31/01/25 5:35 PM, Harshvardhan Jha wrote: > On 30/01/25 6:05 PM, Jürgen Groß wrote: >> On 29.01.25 19:46, Harshvardhan Jha wrote: >>> On 30/01/25 12:13 AM, Jürgen Groß wrote: >>>> On 29.01.25 19:35, Harshvardhan Jha wrote: >>>>> On 29/

Re: v5.4.289 failed to boot with error megasas_build_io_fusion 3219 sge_count (-12) is out of range

Hi All, +stable There seems to be some formatting issues in my log output. I have attached it as a file. Thanks & Regards, Harshvardhan On 29/01/25 1:57 PM, Harshvardhan Jha wrote: > Hello there, > > The stable tag v5.4.289 seems to fail to boot with following trace: > > [

Re: v5.4.289 failed to boot with error megasas_build_io_fusion 3219 sge_count (-12) is out of range

Hi Greg, On 29/01/25 2:18 PM, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 02:13:34PM +0530, Harshvardhan Jha wrote: >> Hi there, >> >> On 29/01/25 2:05 PM, Greg KH wrote: >>> On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 02:03:51PM +0530, Harshvardhan Jha wrote: >>>> Hi All, >

v5.4.289 failed to boot with error megasas_build_io_fusion 3219 sge_count (-12) is out of range

Hello there, The stable tag v5.4.289 seems to fail to boot with following trace: [ OK ] Created slice system-serial\x2dgetty.slice. [ OK ] Listening on udev Control Socket. [ OK ] Reached target Local Encrypted Volumes. [ OK ] Listening on /dev/initctl Compatibility Named Pipe. [ OK ] Listening o

Re: v5.4.289 failed to boot with error megasas_build_io_fusion 3219 sge_count (-12) is out of range

On 29/01/25 2:34 PM, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 02:29:48PM +0530, Harshvardhan Jha wrote: >> Hi Greg, >> >> On 29/01/25 2:18 PM, Greg KH wrote: >>> On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 02:13:34PM +0530, Harshvardhan Jha wrote: >>>> Hi there, &g

Re: v5.4.289 failed to boot with error megasas_build_io_fusion 3219 sge_count (-12) is out of range

Hi there, On 29/01/25 2:05 PM, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 02:03:51PM +0530, Harshvardhan Jha wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> +stable >> >> There seems to be some formatting issues in my log output. I have >> attached it as a file. > Confused, what a

Re: v5.4.289 failed to boot with error megasas_build_io_fusion 3219 sge_count (-12) is out of range

On 30/01/25 6:05 PM, Jürgen Groß wrote: > On 29.01.25 19:46, Harshvardhan Jha wrote: >> >> On 30/01/25 12:13 AM, Jürgen Groß wrote: >>> On 29.01.25 19:35, Harshvardhan Jha wrote: >>>> >>>> On 29/01/25 4:52 PM, Juergen Gross wrote: >>>>&

Re: v5.4.289 failed to boot with error megasas_build_io_fusion 3219 sge_count (-12) is out of range

On 30/01/25 3:31 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Wed, 29 Jan 2025, Jürgen Groß wrote: >> On 29.01.25 19:35, Harshvardhan Jha wrote: >>> On 29/01/25 4:52 PM, Juergen Gross wrote: >>>> On 29.01.25 10:15, Harshvardhan Jha wrote: >>>>> On 29/01/25

Re: v5.4.289 failed to boot with error megasas_build_io_fusion 3219 sge_count (-12) is out of range

On 29/01/25 4:52 PM, Juergen Gross wrote: > On 29.01.25 10:15, Harshvardhan Jha wrote: >> >> On 29/01/25 2:34 PM, Greg KH wrote: >>> On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 02:29:48PM +0530, Harshvardhan Jha wrote: >>>> Hi Greg, >>>> >>>> On 29/01/25

Re: v5.4.289 failed to boot with error megasas_build_io_fusion 3219 sge_count (-12) is out of range

On 30/01/25 12:13 AM, Jürgen Groß wrote: > On 29.01.25 19:35, Harshvardhan Jha wrote: >> >> On 29/01/25 4:52 PM, Juergen Gross wrote: >>> On 29.01.25 10:15, Harshvardhan Jha wrote: >>>> >>>> On 29/01/25 2:34 PM, Greg KH wrote: >>>>

Re: [6.1.y] Regression from b1e6e80a1b42 ("xen/swiotlb: add alignment check for dma buffers") when booting with Xen and mpt3sas_cm0 _scsih_probe failures

Hi Juergen, On 15/02/25 7:09 PM, Jürgen Groß wrote: > On 15.02.25 13:34, Greg KH wrote: >> On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 12:47:57PM +0100, Jürgen Groß wrote: >>> On 12.02.25 16:12, Harshit Mogalapalli wrote: Hi Salvatore, On 12/02/25 00:56, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Hi Harshit, >>

[PATCH 5.15.y 1/1] xen/swiotlb: relax alignment requirements

machine level. So carve out the alignment check from range_straddles_page_boundary() and move it to a helper called by xen_swiotlb_alloc_coherent() and xen_swiotlb_free_coherent() directly. Fixes: 9f40ec84a797 ("xen/swiotlb: add alignment check for dma buffers") Signed-off-by: Harshv

[PATCH 5.15.y 0/1] Manual Backport of 099606a7b2d5 to 5.15

15 are the opposite of those in 6.1 xen/swiotlib. Harshvardhan Jha (1): xen/swiotlb: relax alignment requirements drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c | 18 +++--- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) -- 2.47.1

Re: [PATCH 5.15.y 1/1] xen/swiotlb: relax alignment requirements

On 07/04/25 12:44 PM, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Apr 07, 2025 at 12:02:35AM -0700, Harshvardhan Jha wrote: >> [ Upstream commit 099606a7b2d53e99ce31af42894c1fc9d77c6db9] > Wrong git id :( Ah my bad is it 85fcb57c983f423180ba6ec5d0034242da05cc54 instead? Harshvardhan

[PATCH 5.15.y v2 1/1] xen/swiotlb: relax alignment requirements

machine level. So carve out the alignment check from range_straddles_page_boundary() and move it to a helper called by xen_swiotlb_alloc_coherent() and xen_swiotlb_free_coherent() directly. Fixes: 9f40ec84a797 ("xen/swiotlb: add alignment check for dma buffers") Signed-off-by: Harshv

[PATCH 5.15.y v2 0/1] Manual Backport of 099606a7b2d5 to 5.15

15 are the opposite of those in 6.1 xen/swiotlib. Harshvardhan Jha (1): xen/swiotlb: relax alignment requirements drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c | 18 +++--- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) -- 2.47.1

Re: [6.1.y] Regression from b1e6e80a1b42 ("xen/swiotlb: add alignment check for dma buffers") when booting with Xen and mpt3sas_cm0 _scsih_probe failures

On 15/02/25 8:25 PM, Greg KH wrote: > On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 02:39:46PM +0100, Jürgen Groß wrote: >> On 15.02.25 13:34, Greg KH wrote: >>> On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 12:47:57PM +0100, Jürgen Groß wrote: On 12.02.25 16:12, Harshit Mogalapalli wrote: > Hi Salvatore, > > On 12/02/25 0

[PATCH 5.15.y v3 1/1] xen/swiotlb: relax alignment requirements

rgen Gross Signed-off-by: Harshvardhan Jha --- drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c | 18 +++--- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c b/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c index 0392841a822fa..65da97be06285 100644 --- a/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c +++ b/d

[PATCH 5.15.y v3 0/1] Manual Backport of 099606a7b2d5 to 5.15

h differs quite significantly compared to the original. Changes in v2: Include correct upstream SHA in the commit message Changes in v3: Patch remains the same, however further verification and testing was done. Harshvardhan Jha (1): xen/swiotlb: relax alignment requirements drivers/xen/swi

[PATCH 5.4.y 1/1] xen/swiotlb: relax alignment requirements

rgen Gross Signed-off-by: Harshvardhan Jha --- drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c | 18 +++--- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c b/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c index 5bd29d0bffa2e..382ee7dc3d5d9 100644 --- a/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c +++ b/drivers/x

[PATCH 5.10.y 1/1] xen/swiotlb: relax alignment requirements

rgen Gross Signed-off-by: Harshvardhan Jha --- drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c | 18 +++--- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c b/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c index 000d02ea4f7d8..d8efb8ea23a0d 100644 --- a/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c +++ b/d

[PATCH 5.10.y 0/1] Manual Backport of 099606a7b2d5 to 5.10

e opposite of those in 6.1 xen/swiotlib. Harshvardhan Jha (1): xen/swiotlb: relax alignment requirements drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c | 18 +++--- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) -- 2.47.1

[PATCH 5.4.y 0/1] Manual Backport of 099606a7b2d5 to 5.4

pposite of those in 6.1 xen/swiotlib. Harshvardhan Jha (1): xen/swiotlb: relax alignment requirements drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c | 18 +++--- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) -- 2.47.1