On 3. May 2019, at 20:56, Lars Kurth
mailto:lars.kurth@gmail.com>> wrote:
On 3 May 2019, at 10:48, Dario Faggioli
mailto:dfaggi...@suse.com>> wrote:
On Fri, 2019-05-03 at 15:38 +, Eslam Elnikety wrote:
When unpausing a capped domain, the scheduler currently clears the
CSCHED_FLAG_VCP
> On 7. May 2019, at 12:06, Jan Beulich wrote:
>
On 07.05.19 at 12:03, wrote:
> On 07.05.19 at 11:55, wrote:
>>> On 5/6/19 1:46 PM, Eslam Elnikety wrote:
--- a/xen/common/page_alloc.c
+++ b/xen/common/page_alloc.c
@@ -214,6 +214,12 @@ custom_param("bootscrub", parse_boo
On 07.05.19, 15:17, "Wei Liu" wrote:
On Tue, May 07, 2019 at 08:35:48AM +, Eslam Elnikety wrote:
> Each HVM guest currently gets a vkbd frontend/backend pair (c/s
ebbd2561b4c).
> This consumes host resources unnecessarily for guests that have no use for
> vkbd. Make this b
> On 7. May 2019, at 14:11, Jan Beulich wrote:
>
On 07.05.19 at 13:34, wrote:
>> --- a/xen/common/page_alloc.c
>> +++ b/xen/common/page_alloc.c
>> @@ -214,6 +214,10 @@ custom_param("bootscrub", parse_bootscrub_param);
>> static unsigned long __initdata opt_bootscrub_chunk = MB(128);
>> siz
> On 7. May 2019, at 15:53, Eslam Elnikety wrote:
>
> Each HVM guest currently gets a vkbd frontend/backend pair (c/s ebbd2561b4c).
> This consumes host resources unnecessarily for guests that have no use for
> vkbd. Make this behaviour tunable to allow an administrator to choose. The
> commit r
On 13. May 2019, at 12:48, Wei Liu
mailto:wei.l...@citrix.com>> wrote:
On Tue, May 07, 2019 at 01:53:20PM +, Eslam Elnikety wrote:
Each HVM guest currently gets a vkbd frontend/backend pair (c/s ebbd2561b4c).
This consumes host resources unnecessarily for guests that have no use for
vkbd. Ma
> On 29. Jul 2019, at 20:58, Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 7:16 PM Adam Williamson
> wrote:
>>
>> OK, so, to move forward with this (and looping in cloud list): does
>> someone want to propose a set (ideally small - 2 would be great, one
>> Xen and one non-Xen, if we can cover
> On 1. Aug 2019, at 18:27, Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 3:27 AM Elnikety, Eslam wrote:
>>
>> But t3 is not Xen.
>>
> That's a good reason to not use it. :-) I picked it to be a small,
> cheap instance that would represent a potential us
> On 7. Aug 2019, at 13:40, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>
> On 07/08/2019 12:20, Eslam Elnikety wrote:
>> Adding support for FIFO event channel ABI was first introduced in Xen 4.4
>> (see 88910061ec6). Make this support tunable, since the choice of which
>> event channel ABI has implications for hiber
> On 7. Aug 2019, at 14:30, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>
> On 07/08/2019 13:07, Elnikety, Eslam wrote:
>>> On 7. Aug 2019, at 13:40, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>>
>>> On 07/08/2019 12:20, Eslam Elnikety wrote:
>>>> Adding support for FIFO event chann
> On 7. Aug 2019, at 15:41, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>
> On 07/08/2019 12:20, Eslam Elnikety wrote:
>> diff --git a/xen/include/public/domctl.h b/xen/include/public/domctl.h
>> index 19486d5e32..654b4fdd22 100644
>> --- a/xen/include/public/domctl.h
>> +++ b/xen/include/public/domctl.h
>> @@ -64,6
11 matches
Mail list logo
