flight 186562 linux-linus real [real]
flight 186571 linux-linus real-retest [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/186562/
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/186571/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking):
test-armhf-
flight 186565 libvirt real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/186565/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 16 saverestore-support-checkfail like 186542
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt 15 migrate-s
From: Michael Kelley Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2024 8:05
AM
>
> From: Petr Tesařík Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2024 12:21 AM
>
> [...]
>
> > > @@ -187,10 +169,13 @@ static inline bool is_swiotlb_buffer(struct device
> > > *dev, phys_addr_t paddr)
> > >* This barrier pairs with smp_mb() in sw
From: Petr Tesařík Sent: Friday, June 28, 2024 12:47 AM
>
> V Fri, 28 Jun 2024 08:01:29 +0200
> "h...@lst.de" napsáno:
>
> > On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 04:02:59PM +, Michael Kelley wrote:
> > > > > Conceptually, it's still being used as a boolean function based on
> > > > > whether the return
flight 186568 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/186568/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 16 saverestore-support-checkfail like 186559
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64
flight 186578 linux-linus real [real]
flight 186583 linux-linus real-retest [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/186578/
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/186583/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run
On Sat, Jun 29, 2024 at 03:55:58PM +, Michael Kelley wrote:
> Unless there is further discussion on this point, I'll just keep the original
> "is_swiotlb_buffer()" in v2.
That is the wrong name for something that returns the pool as pointed
out before.
