flight 169248 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/169248/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 168254
build-amd64-xsm
On 09.04.22 06:50, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Fold each branch into its only caller.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig
---
drivers/block/drbd/drbd_main.c | 47 +++---
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_main.c b/dri
On 09.04.22 06:50, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Just use a non-zero max_discard_sectors as an indicator for discard
support, similar to what is done for write zeroes.
The only places where needs special attention is the RAID5 driver,
which must clear discard support for security reasons by default,
flight 169240 xen-4.13-testing real [real]
flight 169256 xen-4.13-testing real-retest [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/169240/
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/169256/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking):
t
Hi Stefano,
On 21/03/2022 20:03, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Mon, 21 Mar 2022, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 18.03.2022 22:50, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Fri, 18 Mar 2022, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 11.03.2022 07:11, Penny Zheng wrote:
In case to own statically shared pages when owner domain is not
ex
On 08.04.22 22:25, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Fri, 8 Apr 2022, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 08.04.2022 13:37, Luca Fancellu wrote:
On 8 Apr 2022, at 10:01, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 08.04.2022 10:45, Luca Fancellu wrote:
---
docs/misc/arm/device-tree/cpupools.txt | 140 +
xen/arch/a
Hi Stefano,
On 08/04/2022 23:46, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
So I don't think that when the owner dies, we need to actively go and
unmap the pages at the borrowers. Also because it would likely cause
them to crash: from their point of view the memory was there, and
suddenly it is not there anymore
Hi Penny,
On 11/03/2022 06:11, Penny Zheng wrote:
From: Penny Zheng
This commit introduces a new helper destroy_domain_shm to destroy static
shared memory at domain de-construction.
This patch only considers the scenario where the owner domain is the
default dom_shared, for user-defined owner
Hi,
On 08/04/2022 23:59, Julien Grall wrote:
On 11/03/2022 06:11, Penny Zheng wrote:
From: Penny Zheng
This commits introduces a new helper guest_physmap_add_shm to set up
shared
memory foreign mapping for borrower domain.
Firstly it should get and take reference of statically shared pages
Hi,
On 11/03/2022 06:11, Penny Zheng wrote:
From: Penny Zheng
When destroyed domain is an owner domain of a static shared memory
region, then we need to ensure that all according borrower domains
shall not have the access to this static shared memory region too.
As Stefano wrote, I don't thi
flight 169241 xen-4.14-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/169241/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 19 guest-stop fail like 169212
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-a
On 4/9/22 12:50 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Secure erase is a very different operation from discard in that it is
a data integrity operation vs hint. Fully split the limits and helper
infrastructure to make the separation more clear.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig
Reviewed-by: Martin K. Pet
flight 169243 qemu-mainline real [real]
flight 169260 qemu-mainline real-retest [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/169243/
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/169260/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking):
test-am
flight 169249 linux-linus real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/169249/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking):
test-amd64-amd64-xl-rtds 20 guest-localmigrate/x10 fail REGR. vs. 169174
Tests which did not succeed,
flight 169254 libvirt real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/169254/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64-libvirt 6 libvirt-buildfail REGR. vs. 151777
build-arm64-libvirt
flight 169258 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/169258/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 168254
build-amd64-xsm
flight 169251 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/169251/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking):
test-armhf-armhf-xl-rtds18 guest-start/debian.repeat fail REGR. vs. 169233
Tests which did not succeed
On 4/7/22 5:38 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
When running as a Xen PV guest use the extra memory (memory which isn't
allocated for the guest at boot time) only for ballooning purposes and
not for zone device allocations. This will remove some code without any
lack of functionality.
While at it move
flight 169263 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/169263/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 168254
build-amd64-xsm
flight 169252 xen-4.16-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/169252/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 19 guest-stopfail like 169194
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-a
flight 169265 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/169265/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 168254
build-amd64-xsm
flight 169261 qemu-mainline real [real]
flight 169267 qemu-mainline real-retest [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/169261/
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/169267/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking):
test-am
flight 169262 linux-linus real [real]
flight 169268 linux-linus real-retest [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/169262/
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/169268/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking):
test-arm64-
flight 169266 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/169266/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 168254
build-amd64-xsm
On Sat, Apr 09, 2022 at 10:15:33AM +0200, Christoph Böhmwalder wrote:
> On 09.04.22 06:50, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> Just use a non-zero max_discard_sectors as an indicator for discard
>> support, similar to what is done for write zeroes.
>>
>> The only places where needs special attention is the
On Sat, Apr 09, 2022 at 10:32:52PM +0800, Coly Li wrote:
>> Acked-by: Coly Li [drbd]
>
> Hi Christoph,
>
> My ACK is for bcache, not drbd here.
Fixed.
flight 169271 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/169271/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 168254
build-amd64-xsm
27 matches
Mail list logo
