flight 167531 linux-linus real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/167531/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking):
test-armhf-armhf-xl-rtds18 guest-start/debian.repeat fail REGR. vs. 167529
Tests which did not succeed,
flight 167533 libvirt real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/167533/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-armhf-libvirt 6 libvirt-buildfail REGR. vs. 151777
build-amd64-libvirt
On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 11:49:08PM +0800, G.R. wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 3:13 AM Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>
> > Could you build a debug kernel with the following patch applied and
> > give me the trace when it explodes?
>
> Please find the trace and the kernel CL below.
> Note, the domU get
flight 167532 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/167532/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking):
test-amd64-amd64-dom0pvh-xl-intel 20 guest-localmigrate/x10 fail in 167523
pass in 167532
test-amd64-amd64-lib
when enable CONFIG_NEW_VGIC in ARM64 QEMU Platform, it will build failed.
so fix it and make it can select GICV2.
Signed-off-by: Dongjiu Geng
---
$ make dist-xen XEN_TARGET_ARCH=arm64 CROSS_COMPILE=aarch64-linux-gnu- -j10
make -C xen install
make[1]: Entering directory
'/home/workspace/gengdongj
Stefano Stabellini 于2021年12月24日周五 08:08写道：
>
> On Wed, 22 Dec 2021, Julien Grall wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On 22/12/2021 09:38, Dongjiu Geng wrote:
> > > when enable CONFIG_NEW_VGIC in ARM64 QEMU Platform, it will build failed.
> > > so fix it and make it can select GICV2.
> >
> > Last time I chec
flight 167535 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/167535/
Perfect :-)
All tests in this flight passed as required
version targeted for testing:
ovmf 6612ff85611bc2be16dc0fd5de0e1413df88941a
baseline version:
ovmf 15c596aeebc24bb97deb7
Hi,
On 24/12/2021 13:24, Dongjiu Geng wrote:
when enable CONFIG_NEW_VGIC in ARM64 QEMU Platform, it will build failed.
so fix it and make it can select GICV2.
As I said in v1, last time I checked QEMU was only able to support
virtualization with GICv3. This is why we added a depends on.
If
Hi,
On 24/12/2021 01:16, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
One more question: As you probably seen - Jan had a complains about SCI
term. He said SCI is ambiguous with ACPI's System
Control Interrupt.
I see his point. As a term I see "SCMI" often and sometimes "SCPI" but
"SCI" is the first time I saw i
Hi,
On 23/12/2021 20:06, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Wed, 22 Dec 2021, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
# Future Ideas
A great suggestion by Julien is to start supporting the dom0less partial
device tree format in xl/libxl as well so that we can have a single
"device_tree" option in dom.cfg instead
Hi Julien,
On Fri, Dec 24, 2021 at 02:29:13PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 24/12/2021 01:16, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > One more question: As you probably seen - Jan had a complains about SCI
> > > term. He said SCI is ambiguous with ACPI's System
> > > Control Interrupt.
> >
> >
On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 04:16:45PM -0800, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Dec 2021, Oleksii Moisieiev wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 06:23:24PM -0800, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > On Wed, 22 Dec 2021, Oleksii Moisieiev wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 01:22:50PM -0800, Stefano S
Hi,
I am not sure why you dropped the others. I have added them back.
On 24/12/2021 14:36, Dongjiu Geng wrote:
Julien Grall 于2021年12月24日周五 21:25写道：
Hi,
On 24/12/2021 13:24, Dongjiu Geng wrote:
when enable CONFIG_NEW_VGIC in ARM64 QEMU Platform, it will build failed.
so fix it and make it c
On 24/12/2021 14:59, Oleksii Moisieiev wrote:
Hi Julien,
Hello,
On Fri, Dec 24, 2021 at 02:29:13PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi,
On 24/12/2021 01:16, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
One more question: As you probably seen - Jan had a complains about SCI
term. He said SCI is ambiguous with AC
On 20/12/2021 16:41, Oleksii Moisieiev wrote:
Hi Julien,
Hello,
On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 04:38:31PM +, Julien Grall wrote:
On 17/12/2021 13:58, Oleksii Moisieiev wrote:
Hi Julien,
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 01:37:35PM +, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi,
On 17/12/2021 13:23, Oleksii M
flight 167534 qemu-mainline real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/167534/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 19 guest-stopfail like 167530
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 16 sav
On Fri, Dec 24, 2021 at 03:28:56PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
>
>
> On 24/12/2021 14:59, Oleksii Moisieiev wrote:
> > Hi Julien,
>
> Hello,
>
> > On Fri, Dec 24, 2021 at 02:29:13PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On 24/12/2021 01:16, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > > > One mor
On Fri, Dec 24, 2021 at 03:42:42PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 20/12/2021 16:41, Oleksii Moisieiev wrote:
> > Hi Julien,
>
> Hello,
>
> > On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 04:38:31PM +, Julien Grall wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 17/12/2021 13:58, Oleksii Moisieiev wrote:
> > > > Hi Julien,
> > >
> > >
flight 167536 linux-linus real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/167536/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 19 guest-stopfail like 167531
test-amd64-amd64-qemuu-nested-amd 20
flight 167538 libvirt real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/167538/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-armhf-libvirt 6 libvirt-buildfail REGR. vs. 151777
build-amd64-libvirt
20 matches
Mail list logo
