flight 162076 libvirt real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/162076/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-armhf-libvirt 6 libvirt-buildfail REGR. vs. 151777
build-amd64-libvirt
flight 162079 xen-unstable-smoke real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/162079/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-arm64-xsm 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 162023
build-armhf
Hi Julien
> -Original Message-
> From: Julien Grall
> Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2021 8:06 PM
> To: Penny Zheng ; xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org;
> sstabell...@kernel.org
> Cc: Bertrand Marquis ; Wei Chen
> ; nd
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] xen/arm: introduce allocate_static_memory
>
> Hi P
flight 162063 linux-linus real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/162063/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-xl-xsm7 xen-install fail REGR. vs. 152332
test-amd64-i386-xl-
Hi Julien
> -Original Message-
> From: Julien Grall
> Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2021 8:13 PM
> To: Penny Zheng ; Jan Beulich
> Cc: Bertrand Marquis ; Wei Chen
> ; nd ; xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org;
> sstabell...@kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] xen/arm: intruduce alloc_domstatic_pa
Hi Julien
> -Original Message-
> From: Julien Grall
> Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2021 8:09 PM
> To: Penny Zheng ; xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org;
> sstabell...@kernel.org
> Cc: Bertrand Marquis ; Wei Chen
> ; nd
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] xen/arm: parse `xen,static-mem` info during
> domai
On 18.05.21 20:11, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Juergen,
I have started to look at preserving transaction accross Live-update in
C Xenstored. So far, I managed to transfer transaction that read/write
existing nodes.
Now, I am running into trouble to transfer new/deleted node within a
transactio
On 18.05.2021 19:46, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 03:24:28PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 17.05.2021 15:20, Daniel Kiper wrote:
>>> On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 08:48:32AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 07.05.2021 22:26, Bob Eshleman wrote:
> What is your intuition WRT the ide
flight 162083 xen-unstable-smoke real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/162083/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-arm64-xsm 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 162023
build-armhf
flight 162086 xen-unstable-coverity real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/162086/
Perfect :-)
All tests in this flight passed as required
version targeted for testing:
xen caa9c4471d1d74b2d236467aaf7e63a806ac11a4
baseline version:
xen cb19
On 19.05.2021 05:16, Penny Zheng wrote:
>> From: Julien Grall
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2021 5:46 PM
>>
>> On 18/05/2021 06:21, Penny Zheng wrote:
>>> --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/mm.h
>>> +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/mm.h
>>> @@ -88,7 +88,15 @@ struct page_info
>>>*/
>>> u32 tlbfl
On 18.05.2021 16:47, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> @@ -425,8 +425,11 @@ static elf_errorstatus elf_xen_addr_calc_check(struct
> elf_binary *elf,
> return -1;
> }
>
> -/* Initial guess for virt_base is 0 if it is not explicitly defined. */
> -if ( parms->virt_base == UNSET_ADDR )
flight 162087 xen-unstable-smoke real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/162087/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-arm64-xsm 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 162023
build-armhf
flight 162071 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/162071/
Perfect :-)
All tests in this flight passed as required
version targeted for testing:
ovmf 15ee7b76891a78141e6e30ef3f8572e8d6b326d2
baseline version:
ovmf 42ec0a315b8a2f445b7a7
> On 19 May 2021, at 06:59, Technologyrss Mail
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am new user for DEV XEN project on my Centos server. Please guide me how to
> install & deploy XEN project on centos 7?
>
Hi,
I think you might write to xen-users@, here the mailing lists for Xen
https://xenproject.o
flight 162070 qemu-mainline real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/162070/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-qemuu-freebsd11-amd64 16 guest-saverestore fail REGR. vs.
152631
test-amd64-i3
Hi Juergen,
On 19/05/2021 10:09, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 18.05.21 20:11, Julien Grall wrote:
I have started to look at preserving transaction accross Live-update in
C Xenstored. So far, I managed to transfer transaction that read/write
existing nodes.
Now, I am running into trouble to tr
On 19/05/2021 13:32, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Juergen,
On 19/05/2021 10:09, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 18.05.21 20:11, Julien Grall wrote:
I have started to look at preserving transaction accross Live-update in
C Xenstored. So far, I managed to transfer transaction that
read/write existing
When adding the HASH_CALLBACKS_CHECK() I failed to properly recognize
the (somewhat unusually formatted) if() around the call to
hash_domain_foreach()). Gcc 11 is absolutely right in pointing out the
apparently misleading indentation. Besides adding the missing braces,
also adjust the two oddly for
Hi,
On 18/05/2021 18:05, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 18/05/2021 18:03, Julien Grall wrote:
From: Julien Grall
Gitlab CI spotted an issue when building the tools Arm:
xg_dom_arm.c: In function 'meminit':
xg_dom_arm.c:401:50: error: passing argument 3 of 'set_mode' discards 'const'
qualifier from
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 11:29:43AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 18.05.2021 19:46, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> > On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 03:24:28PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> On 17.05.2021 15:20, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> >>> On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 08:48:32AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 07.05.2
On 19.05.21 14:33, Julien Grall wrote:
On 19/05/2021 13:32, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Juergen,
On 19/05/2021 10:09, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 18.05.21 20:11, Julien Grall wrote:
I have started to look at preserving transaction accross Live-update
in
C Xenstored. So far, I managed to transfe
> On 19 May 2021, at 13:36, Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> When adding the HASH_CALLBACKS_CHECK() I failed to properly recognize
> the (somewhat unusually formatted) if() around the call to
> hash_domain_foreach()). Gcc 11 is absolutely right in pointing out the
> apparently misleading indentation. Be
flight 162089 xen-unstable-smoke real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/162089/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-arm64-xsm 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 162023
build-armhf
On Wed, 2021-05-19 at 11:09 +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 18.05.21 20:11, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Juergen,
I have started to look at preserving transaction accross Live-update in
C Xenstored. So far, I managed to transfer transaction that read/write
existing nodes.
Now, I am running into t
Hey,
So...
On Mon, 2021-05-17 at 19:16 +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 10/05/2021 09:35, Costin Lupu wrote:
> > If PAGE_SIZE is already defined in the system (e.g. in
> > /usr/include/limits.h
> > header) then gcc will trigger a redefinition error because of -
> > Werror. This
> > patch replaces
On 19.05.2021 14:48, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 11:29:43AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 18.05.2021 19:46, Daniel Kiper wrote:
>>> On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 03:24:28PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 17.05.2021 15:20, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 08:48:32AM
branch xen-unstable-smoke
xenbranch xen-unstable-smoke
job build-armhf
testid xen-build
Tree: qemuu git://xenbits.xen.org/qemu-xen.git
Tree: xen git://xenbits.xen.org/xen.git
*** Found and reproduced problem changeset ***
Bug is in tree: xen git://xenbits.xen.org/xen.git
Bug introduced: 8f
Summary:
We have for many years used the Freenode IRC network for real-time
chat about Xen. Unfortunately, Freenode is undergoing a crisis.
There is a dispute between, on the one hand, Andrew Lee, and on the
other hand, all (or almost all) Freenode volunteer staff. We must
make a decision.
I h
Gcc 11 looks to make incorrect assumptions about valid ranges that
pointers may be used for addressing when they are derived from e.g. a
plain constant. See https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100680.
Utilize RELOC_HIDE() to work around the issue, which for x86 manifests
in at least
- mpp
The difference of two pdx_to_page() return values is a number of pages,
not the number of bytes covered by the corresponding frame table entries.
Fixes: 3cb68d2b59ab ("tboot: fix S3 issue for Intel Trusted Execution
Technology.")
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
--- a/xen/arch/x86/tboot.c
+++ b/xen/a
Replace a bogus cast, move the static variable into the only function
using it, and add __initconst. While there, also remove a pointless NULL
check.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
--- a/xen/arch/x86/tboot.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/tboot.c
@@ -27,8 +27,6 @@ static vmac_t domain_mac; /* MAC for
stati
flight 162078 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/162078/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking):
test-armhf-armhf-xl-multivcpu 8 xen-boot fail pass in 162058
test-armhf-armhf-xl-rtds 18
> On May 19, 2021, at 4:39 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:
>
> I recommend that we switch to using OFTC as soon as possible.
Thanks, Ian. I tend to agree with the recommendation. I think unless someone
wants to argue that we go to libera (or stick with freenode), we should go with
that option.
flight 162093 xen-unstable-smoke real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/162093/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt 15 migrate-support-checkfail never pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl 1
Hi Juergen,
On 19/05/2021 13:50, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 19.05.21 14:33, Julien Grall wrote:
On 19/05/2021 13:32, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Juergen,
On 19/05/2021 10:09, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 18.05.21 20:11, Julien Grall wrote:
I have started to look at preserving transaction accross Live
On Wed, 2021-05-19 at 08:28 +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 06:42:45PM +0200, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> > Fix the build inside our openSUSE Tumbleweed container by using
> > adding libzstd headers. While there, remove the explicit dependency
> > for python and python3 as the r
On 19/05/2021 03:22, Penny Zheng wrote:
Hi Julien
Hi Penny,
-Original Message-
From: Julien Grall
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2021 4:58 PM
To: Penny Zheng ; xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org;
sstabell...@kernel.org
Cc: Bertrand Marquis ; Wei Chen
; nd
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] xen/arm: int
Am Mon, 17 May 2021 12:54:02 +0200
schrieb Jan Beulich :
> x86/Xen: swap NX determination and GDT setup on BSP
>
> xen_setup_gdt(), via xen_load_gdt_boot(), wants to adjust page tables.
> For this to work when NX is not available, x86_configure_nx() needs to
> be called first.
Thanks. I tried t
On 5/17/2021 11:42 PM, Claire Chang wrote:
> Add a new function, swiotlb_init_io_tlb_mem, for the io_tlb_mem struct
> initialization to make the code reusable.
>
> Note that we now also call set_memory_decrypted in swiotlb_init_with_tbl.
>
> Signed-off-by: Claire Chang
> ---
> kernel/dma/swi
On 5/17/2021 11:42 PM, Claire Chang wrote:
> Add the initialization function to create restricted DMA pools from
> matching reserved-memory nodes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Claire Chang
> ---
> include/linux/device.h | 4 +++
> include/linux/swiotlb.h | 3 +-
> kernel/dma/swiotlb.c| 76 ++
On 5/17/2021 11:42 PM, Claire Chang wrote:
> Add a new wrapper __dma_direct_free_pages() that will be useful later
> for swiotlb_free().
>
> Signed-off-by: Claire Chang
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli
--
Florian
On 5/17/2021 11:42 PM, Claire Chang wrote:
> Add a new kconfig symbol, DMA_RESTRICTED_POOL, for restricted DMA pool.
>
> Signed-off-by: Claire Chang
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli
--
Florian
flight 162082 linux-linus real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/162082/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-xl-xsm7 xen-install fail REGR. vs. 152332
test-amd64-i386-xl-
On 5/17/2021 11:42 PM, Claire Chang wrote:
> Add a new getter, get_io_tlb_mem, to help select the io_tlb_mem struct.
> The restricted DMA pool is preferred if available.
>
> Signed-off-by: Claire Chang
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli
--
Florian
On 5/17/2021 11:42 PM, Claire Chang wrote:
> Update is_swiotlb_buffer to add a struct device argument. This will be
> useful later to allow for restricted DMA pool.
>
> Signed-off-by: Claire Chang
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli
--
Florian
On 5/17/2021 11:42 PM, Claire Chang wrote:
> Update is_swiotlb_active to add a struct device argument. This will be
> useful later to allow for restricted DMA pool.
>
> Signed-off-by: Claire Chang
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli
--
Florian
On 5/17/2021 11:42 PM, Claire Chang wrote:
> Split the debugfs creation to make the code reusable for supporting
> different bounce buffer pools, e.g. restricted DMA pool.
>
> Signed-off-by: Claire Chang
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli
--
Florian
On 19/05/2021 18:52, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-05-19 at 08:28 +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>> On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 06:42:45PM +0200, Dario Faggioli wrote:
>>> Fix the build inside our openSUSE Tumbleweed container by using
>>> adding libzstd headers. While there, remove the explicit
On 19/05/2021 04:16, Penny Zheng wrote:
Hi Julien
Hi Penny,
-Original Message-
From: Julien Grall
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2021 5:46 PM
To: Penny Zheng ; xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org;
sstabell...@kernel.org
Cc: Bertrand Marquis ; Wei Chen
; nd
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] xen/arm
Hi Jan,
On 19/05/2021 10:49, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 19.05.2021 05:16, Penny Zheng wrote:
From: Julien Grall
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2021 5:46 PM
On 18/05/2021 06:21, Penny Zheng wrote:
--- a/xen/include/asm-arm/mm.h
+++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/mm.h
@@ -88,7 +88,15 @@ struct page_info
On 19/05/2021 08:52, Penny Zheng wrote:
Hi Julien
Hi Penny,
-Original Message-
From: Julien Grall
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2021 8:13 PM
To: Penny Zheng ; Jan Beulich
Cc: Bertrand Marquis ; Wei Chen
; nd ; xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org;
sstabell...@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH
On 19/05/2021 08:27, Penny Zheng wrote:
Hi Julien
-Original Message-
From: Julien Grall
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2021 8:06 PM
To: Penny Zheng ; xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org;
sstabell...@kernel.org
Cc: Bertrand Marquis ; Wei Chen
; nd
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] xen/arm: introduce al
On 14/05/2021 10:50, Anastasiia Lukianenko wrote:
Hi Julien!
Hello,
On Thu, 2021-05-13 at 09:37 +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
On 13/05/2021 09:03, Anastasiia Lukianenko wrote:
The alternative is for U-boot to go through the DT and infer which
regions are free (IOW any region not described).
flight 162096 xen-unstable-smoke real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/162096/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt 15 migrate-support-checkfail never pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl 1
On Wed, 19 May 2021, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 14/05/2021 10:50, Anastasiia Lukianenko wrote:
> > Hi Julien!
>
> Hello,
>
> > On Thu, 2021-05-13 at 09:37 +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> > >
> > > On 13/05/2021 09:03, Anastasiia Lukianenko wrote:
> > > The alternative is for U-boot to go through the
On Sat, 15 May 2021, Julien Grall wrote:
> (+ Andrew, + Stefano)
>
> On 15/05/2021 02:18, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
> > On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 09:32:10AM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> > > On 14/05/2021 03:42, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Issue is what is the intended use of the memory ra
On 5/18/21 12:13 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> @@ -95,22 +95,25 @@ static int __xen_pcibk_add_pci_dev(struc
>
> /*
>* Keep multi-function devices together on the virtual PCI bus, except
> - * virtual functions.
> + * that we want to keep virtual functions at func 0 on the
On 5/18/21 12:14 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> When multiple PCI devices get assigned to a guest right at boot, libxl
> incrementally populates the backend tree. The writes for the first of
> the devices trigger the backend watch. In turn xen_pcibk_setup_backend()
> will set the XenBus state to Initia
flight 162090 qemu-mainline real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/162090/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-qemuu-freebsd11-amd64 16 guest-saverestore fail REGR. vs.
152631
test-amd64-i3
Hi, all!
On 5/20/21 2:11 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Wed, 19 May 2021, Julien Grall wrote:
>> On 14/05/2021 10:50, Anastasiia Lukianenko wrote:
>>> Hi Julien!
>> Hello,
>>
>>> On Thu, 2021-05-13 at 09:37 +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
On 13/05/2021 09:03, Anastasiia Lukianenko wrote:
Hi Julien
> -Original Message-
> From: Julien Grall
> Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2021 7:48 PM
> To: Penny Zheng ; xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org;
> sstabell...@kernel.org
> Cc: Bertrand Marquis ; Wei Chen
> ; nd
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Xen: Design doc for 1:1 direct-map and static allocation
Hi Julien
> -Original Message-
> From: Julien Grall
> Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2021 2:27 AM
> To: Penny Zheng ; xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org;
> sstabell...@kernel.org
> Cc: Bertrand Marquis ; Wei Chen
> ; nd
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] xen/arm: introduce domain on Static Allocation
>
Hi Julien
> -Original Message-
> From: Julien Grall
> Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2021 3:46 AM
> To: Penny Zheng ; xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org;
> sstabell...@kernel.org
> Cc: Bertrand Marquis ; Wei Chen
> ; nd
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] xen/arm: introduce PGC_reserved
>
>
>
> On 19/0
Hi Julien
> -Original Message-
> From: Julien Grall
> Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2021 4:10 AM
> To: Penny Zheng ; xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org;
> sstabell...@kernel.org
> Cc: Bertrand Marquis ; Wei Chen
> ; nd
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] xen/arm: introduce allocate_static_memory
>
>
>
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 2:54 AM Florian Fainelli wrote:
>
>
>
> On 5/17/2021 11:42 PM, Claire Chang wrote:
> > Add the initialization function to create restricted DMA pools from
> > matching reserved-memory nodes.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Claire Chang
> > ---
> > include/linux/device.h | 4 +++
On 19.05.21 19:10, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Juergen,
On 19/05/2021 13:50, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 19.05.21 14:33, Julien Grall wrote:
On 19/05/2021 13:32, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Juergen,
On 19/05/2021 10:09, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 18.05.21 20:11, Julien Grall wrote:
I have started to loo
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 2:50 AM Florian Fainelli wrote:
>
>
>
> On 5/17/2021 11:42 PM, Claire Chang wrote:
> > Add a new function, swiotlb_init_io_tlb_mem, for the io_tlb_mem struct
> > initialization to make the code reusable.
> >
> > Note that we now also call set_memory_decrypted in swiotlb_ini
68 matches
Mail list logo
