Hi Jürgen, thanks for taking a look at this. A few comments below:
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 10:47 PM Jürgen Groß wrote:
>
> On 16.02.21 21:34, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > + x86 maintainers
> >
> > It looks like the tlbflush is getting stuck?
>
> I have seen this case multiple times on customer s
Re-sending primarily for the purpose of getting a release ack, an
explicit release nak, or an indication of there not being a need,
all for at least the first three patches here (which are otherwise
ready to go in). I've dropped the shadow part of the series from
this re-submission, because it has
The "guest" variants are intended to work with (potentially) fully guest
controlled addresses, while the "unsafe" variants are intended to be
used in order to access addresses not (directly) under guest control,
within Xen's part of virtual address space. (For linear page table and
descriptor table
The "guest" variants are intended to work with (potentially) fully guest
controlled addresses, while the "unsafe" variants are intended to be
used in order to access addresses not (directly) under guest control,
within Xen's part of virtual address space. Subsequently we will want
them to have dist
Inspired by
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/f12e7d3cecf41b2c29734ea45a393be21d4a8058.1597848273.git.jpoim...@redhat.com/
and prior work in that area of x86 Linux, suppress speculation with
guest specified pointer values by suitably masking the addresses to
non-canonical space in case they fall into Xe
Bring them (back) in line with __{get,put}_guest().
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
--- a/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
@@ -1649,19 +1649,19 @@ static void load_segments(struct vcpu *n
if ( !ring_1(regs) )
{
-ret = put_user(regs->ss,
Using copy_{from,to}_user(), this code was assuming to be called only by
PV guests. Use copy_{from,to}_guest() instead, transforming the incoming
structure field into a guest handle (the field should really have been
one in the first place). Also do not transform the debuggee address into
a pointer
Bring them (back) in line with __copy_{from,to}_guest_pv(). Since it
falls in the same group, also convert clear_user(). Instead of adjusting
__raw_clear_guest(), drop it - it's unused and would require a non-
checking __clear_guest_pv() which we don't have.
Add previously missing __user at some c
... to {get,put}_unsafe_size(). There's no need to have the macros
expanded once per case label in the latter. This also makes the former
well-formed single statements again. No change in generated code.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
--- a/xen/include/asm-x86/uaccess.h
+++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/uac
The former expands to a single (memory accessing) insn, which the latter
does not guarantee. Yet we'd prefer to read consistent PTEs rather than
risking a split read racing with an update done elsewhere.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
--- a/xen/arch/x86/pv/mm.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/pv/mm.c
@@ -41,9 +4
Ian?
On 09.02.2021 14:02, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 09.02.2021 13:53, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> The middle two patches are meant to address a regression reported on
>> the list under "Problems with APIC on versions 4.9 and later (4.8
>> works)". In the course of analyzing output from a debugging patch I
On 17.02.21 09:12, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
Hi Jürgen, thanks for taking a look at this. A few comments below:
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 10:47 PM Jürgen Groß wrote:
On 16.02.21 21:34, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
+ x86 maintainers
It looks like the tlbflush is getting stuck?
I have seen this ca
Paul (or others), thoughts?
On 04.02.2021 12:24, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 04.02.2021 10:26, Paul Durrant wrote:
>>> From: Jan Beulich
>>> Sent: 02 February 2021 15:15
>>>
>>> XENMEM_decrease_reservation isn't the only means by which pages can get
>>> removed from a guest, yet all removals ought to
On 05.02.2021 12:28, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 05.02.2021 11:41, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 10/11/2020 13:26, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> The SDM specifically allows for earlier writes to fully overlapping
>>> ranges to be dropped. If a guest did so, hvmemul_phys_mmio_access()
>>> would crash it if varyin
On 17/02/2021 02:00, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
Hi all,
Today Linux uses the swiotlb-xen driver (drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c) to
translate addresses for DMA operations in Dom0. Specifically,
swiotlb-xen is used to translate the address of a foreign page (a page
belonging to a domU) mapped into D
On 17/02/2021 08:30, Jan Beulich wrote:
Paul (or others), thoughts?
On 04.02.2021 12:24, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 04.02.2021 10:26, Paul Durrant wrote:
From: Jan Beulich
Sent: 02 February 2021 15:15
XENMEM_decrease_reservation isn't the only means by which pages can get
removed from a guest, ye
On 16.02.2021 19:31, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Feb 2021, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 13.02.2021 14:50, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
>>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 06:05:40PM -0800, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
If rombios, seabios and ovmf are all disabled, don't attempt to build
flight 159441 xen-unstable-coverity real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/159441/
Perfect :-)
All tests in this flight passed as required
version targeted for testing:
xen 3b1cc15f1931ba56d0ee256fe9bfe65509733b27
baseline version:
xen 0408
On 02.02.2021 16:14, Jan Beulich wrote:
> XENMEM_decrease_reservation isn't the only means by which pages can get
> removed from a guest, yet all removals ought to be signaled to qemu. Put
> setting of the flag into the central p2m_remove_page() underlying all
> respective hypercalls as well as a f
SMMUv3 driver does not handle multiple StreamId if the master device
supports more than one StreamID.
This bug was introduced when the driver was ported from Linux to XEN.
dt_device_set_protected(..) should be called from add_device(..) not
from the dt_xlate(..).
Move dt_device_set_protected(..)
Patches 1 and 2 clearly are intended for 4.15; patch 3 is possibly
controversial (along the lines of similar relaxation proposed for
other (sub-)hypercalls), and hence unlikely to be a candidate as
well.
1: never permit mapping transitive grants
2: bypass IOMMU (un)mapping when a domain is (un)map
Transitive grants allow an intermediate domain I to grant a target
domain T access to a page which origin domain O did grant I access to.
As an implementation restriction, T is not allowed to map such a grant.
This restriction is currently tried to be enforced by marking active
entries resulting fr
Mappings for a domain's own pages should already be present in the
IOMMU. While installing the same mapping again is merely redundant (and
inefficient), removing the mapping when the grant mapping gets removed
is outright wrong in this case: The mapping was there before the map, so
should remain in
Prior to its introduction, v1 entries weren't checked for this flag, and
the flag also has been meaningless for v1 entries. Therefore it also
shouldn't be checked. (The only consistent alternative would be to also
check for all currently undefined flags to be clear.)
Fixes: b545941b6638 ("Implemen
On 17/02/2021 10:02, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 02.02.2021 16:14, Jan Beulich wrote:
XENMEM_decrease_reservation isn't the only means by which pages can get
removed from a guest, yet all removals ought to be signaled to qemu. Put
setting of the flag into the central p2m_remove_page() underlying al
Hi Jan,
On 17/02/2021 10:46, Jan Beulich wrote:
Mappings for a domain's own pages should already be present in the
IOMMU. While installing the same mapping again is merely redundant (and
inefficient), removing the mapping when the grant mapping gets removed
is outright wrong in this case: The ma
On 15/02/2021 13:14, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 15.02.2021 13:54, Julien Grall wrote:
On 15/02/2021 12:36, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 15.02.2021 12:38, Julien Grall wrote:
Given this series needs to go in 4.15 (we would introduce a 0-day
otherwise), could you clarify whether your patch [1] is intende
Hi Paul,
On 09/02/2021 20:22, Paul Durrant wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Julien Grall
Sent: 09 February 2021 15:28
To: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Cc: hongy...@amazon.co.uk; i...@xenproject.org; Julien Grall
; Jan Beulich
; Paul Durrant
Subject: [for-4.15][PATCH v2 2/5] xen/iommu
Hi Ian,
On 09/02/2021 16:47, Ian Jackson wrote:
Julien Grall writes ("[for-4.15][PATCH v2 0/5] xen/iommu: Collection of bug fixes
for IOMMU teadorwn"):
From: Julien Grall
...
This series is a collection of bug fixes for the IOMMU teardown code.
All of them are candidate for 4.15 as they can
Hi Rahul,
> On 17 Feb 2021, at 10:05, Rahul Singh wrote:
>
> SMMUv3 driver does not handle multiple StreamId if the master device
> supports more than one StreamID.
>
> This bug was introduced when the driver was ported from Linux to XEN.
> dt_device_set_protected(..) should be called from add
On 17.02.2021 12:03, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 17/02/2021 10:46, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> Mappings for a domain's own pages should already be present in the
>> IOMMU. While installing the same mapping again is merely redundant (and
>> inefficient), removing the mapping when the grant mapping gets remov
Hi Jan,
On 17/02/2021 11:38, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 17.02.2021 12:03, Julien Grall wrote:
On 17/02/2021 10:46, Jan Beulich wrote:
Mappings for a domain's own pages should already be present in the
IOMMU. While installing the same mapping again is merely redundant (and
inefficient), removing the
Hi Jan,
On 10/02/2021 16:12, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 10.02.2021 16:04, Julien Grall wrote:
On 10/02/2021 14:32, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 09.02.2021 16:28, Julien Grall wrote:
From: Julien Grall
The new IOMMU page-tables allocator will release the pages when
relinquish the domain resources. Howev
flight 159418 xen-4.12-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/159418/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 19 guest-stop fail like 159241
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-raw 15
On 17.02.2021 12:49, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 10/02/2021 16:12, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 10.02.2021 16:04, Julien Grall wrote:
>>> Are you know saying that the following snipped would be fine:
>>>
>>> if ( d->is_dying )
>>> return 0;
>>
>> In {amd,intel}_iommu_map_page(), after the lock was acq
On 17.02.2021 12:41, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Jan,
>
> On 17/02/2021 11:38, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 17.02.2021 12:03, Julien Grall wrote:
>>> On 17/02/2021 10:46, Jan Beulich wrote:
Mappings for a domain's own pages should already be present in the
IOMMU. While installing the same mappi
On 2021-02-11 10:16, Juergen Gross wrote:
> For avoiding read- and write-tearing by the compiler use READ_ONCE()
> and WRITE_ONCE() for accessing the ring indices in evtchn.c.
>
> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross
> ---
> V2:
> - modify all accesses (Julien Grall)
> ---
> drivers/xen/evtchn.c | 25 ++
On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 07:51:42AM +0100, Jürgen Groß wrote:
> On 17.02.21 06:12, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm observing Linux PV/PVH guest crash when I resume it from sleep. I do
> > this with:
> >
> > virsh -c xen dompmsuspend mem
> > virsh -c xen dompmwakeup
Hi Kevin,
On 10/02/2021 02:21, Tian, Kevin wrote:
From: Julien Grall
Sent: Tuesday, February 9, 2021 11:28 PM
From: Julien Grall
The new per-domain IOMMU page-table allocator will now free the
page-tables when domain's resources are relinquished. However, the root
page-table (i.e. hd->arch.p
From: Julien Grall
The new x86 IOMMU page-tables allocator will release the pages when
relinquishing the domain resources. However, this is not sufficient
when the domain is dying because nothing prevents page-table to be
allocated.
Currently page-table allocations can only happen from iommu_map
From: Julien Grall
Hi all,
This series is a collection of bug fixes for the IOMMU teardown code.
All of them are candidate for 4.15 as they can either leak memory or
lead to host crash/host corruption.
This is sent directly on xen-devel because all the issues were either
introduced in 4.15 or h
From: Julien Grall
At the moment, we are assuming that only iommu_map() can allocate
IOMMU page-table.
Given the complexity of the IOMMU framework, it would be sensible to
have a check closer to the IOMMU allocator. This would avoid to leak
IOMMU page-tables again in the future.
iommu_alloc_pgt
From: Julien Grall
The new per-domain IOMMU page-table allocator will now free the
page-tables when domain's resources are relinquished. However, the
per-domain IOMMU structure will still contain a dangling pointer to
the root page-table.
Xen may access the IOMMU page-tables afterwards at least
Hi Jan,
On 17/02/2021 13:16, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 17.02.2021 12:41, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Jan,
On 17/02/2021 11:38, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 17.02.2021 12:03, Julien Grall wrote:
On 17/02/2021 10:46, Jan Beulich wrote:
Mappings for a domain's own pages should already be present in the
IOMMU.
On 2/11/21 6:19 PM, Alex Bennée wrote:
> These tests make sure we can boot the Xen hypervisor with a Dom0
> kernel using the guest-loader. We currently have to use a kernel I
> built myself because there are issues using the Debian kernel images.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée
> ---
> MAINTAINER
On 17.02.2021 15:24, Julien Grall wrote:
> --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/pci_amd_iommu.c
> +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/pci_amd_iommu.c
> @@ -381,9 +381,18 @@ static int amd_iommu_assign_device(struct domain *d, u8
> devfn,
> return reassign_device(pdev->domain, d, devfn, pdev);
> }
Hi Jan,
On 17/02/2021 14:54, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 17.02.2021 15:24, Julien Grall wrote:
--- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/x86/iommu.c
+++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/x86/iommu.c
@@ -267,6 +267,15 @@ int iommu_free_pgtables(struct domain *d)
struct page_info *pg;
unsigned int done = 0;
On 17.02.2021 15:24, Julien Grall wrote:
> From: Julien Grall
>
> The new x86 IOMMU page-tables allocator will release the pages when
> relinquishing the domain resources. However, this is not sufficient
> when the domain is dying because nothing prevents page-table to be
> allocated.
>
> Curren
On 17.02.2021 15:24, Julien Grall wrote:> ---
a/xen/drivers/passthrough/x86/iommu.c> +++
b/xen/drivers/passthrough/x86/iommu.c> @@ -149,6 +149,13 @@ int
arch_iommu_domain_init(struct domain *d)> > void
arch_iommu_domain_destroy(struct domain *d)> {> +/*> + * There should
be not page
On 17.02.2021 16:00, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Jan,
>
> On 17/02/2021 14:54, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 17.02.2021 15:24, Julien Grall wrote:
>>> --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/x86/iommu.c
>>> +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/x86/iommu.c
>>> @@ -267,6 +267,15 @@ int iommu_free_pgtables(struct domain *d)
Hi Stefano,
> On 17 Feb 2021, at 02:00, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Today Linux uses the swiotlb-xen driver (drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c) to
> translate addresses for DMA operations in Dom0. Specifically,
> swiotlb-xen is used to translate the address of a foreign page (a page
> bel
On 17.02.21 14:48, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 07:51:42AM +0100, Jürgen Groß wrote:
On 17.02.21 06:12, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
Hi,
I'm observing Linux PV/PVH guest crash when I resume it from sleep. I do
this with:
virsh -c xen dompmsuspend mem
Hi Julien,
> On 17 Feb 2021, at 08:50, Julien Grall wrote:
>
>
>
> On 17/02/2021 02:00, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> Today Linux uses the swiotlb-xen driver (drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c) to
>> translate addresses for DMA operations in Dom0. Specifically,
>> swiotlb-xen is used to tran
flight 159443 xen-unstable-smoke real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/159443/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt 15 migrate-support-checkfail never pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl 1
Hi Jan,
On 17/02/2021 15:01, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 17.02.2021 15:24, Julien Grall wrote:
From: Julien Grall
The new x86 IOMMU page-tables allocator will release the pages when
relinquishing the domain resources. However, this is not sufficient
when the domain is dying because nothing prevents
Hi Jan,
On 17/02/2021 15:13, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 17.02.2021 15:24, Julien Grall wrote:> --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/x86/iommu.c> +++
b/xen/drivers/passthrough/x86/iommu.c> @@ -149,6 +149,13 @@ int arch_iommu_domain_init(struct domain
*d)> > void arch_iommu_domain_destroy(struct domain *d
On 17/02/2021 15:37, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
Hi Julien,
Hi Bertrand,
On 17 Feb 2021, at 08:50, Julien Grall wrote:
On 17/02/2021 02:00, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
Hi all,
Today Linux uses the swiotlb-xen driver (drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c) to
translate addresses for DMA operations in Do
Various version of gcc, when compiling with -Og, complain:
libxl_dm.c: In function 'libxl__domain_get_device_model_uid':
libxl_dm.c:256:12: error: 'kill_by_uid' may be used uninitialized in this
function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
256 | if (kill_by_uid)
|^
All paths with nonzero rc head to err. All paths with a zero rc stay heading
towards out.
The comment discussing invariants is now arguably stale - it will be fixed in
one coherent manner when further fixes are in place.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper
---
CC: Ian Jackson
C
Split out of previous series, and split up for clarity.
Andrew Cooper (3):
tools/libxl: Split out and err paths in libxl__domain_get_device_model_uid()
tools/libxl: Simplfy the out path in libxl__domain_get_device_model_uid()
tools/libxl: Rework invariants in libxl__domain_get_device_model_u
All paths heading towards `out` have rc = 0. Assert this property.
The intended_uid check is an error path. Use the err label rather than
falling into subsequent success logic.
With the above two changes, the two `if (!rc)` checks can be dropped.
Now, both remaining tests start with `if (user
Hi Julien,
> On 17 Feb 2021, at 16:41, Julien Grall wrote:
>
>
>
> On 17/02/2021 15:37, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
>> Hi Julien,
>
> Hi Bertrand,
>
>>> On 17 Feb 2021, at 08:50, Julien Grall wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 17/02/2021 02:00, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
Hi all,
Today Linux
On 17/02/2021 15:17, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 17.02.2021 16:00, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Jan,
On 17/02/2021 14:54, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 17.02.2021 15:24, Julien Grall wrote:
--- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/x86/iommu.c
+++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/x86/iommu.c
@@ -267,6 +267,15 @@ int iommu_free_
On 17/02/2021 16:47, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
Hi Julien,
On 17 Feb 2021, at 16:41, Julien Grall wrote:
On 17/02/2021 15:37, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
Hi Julien,
Hi Bertrand,
On 17 Feb 2021, at 08:50, Julien Grall wrote:
On 17/02/2021 02:00, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
Hi all,
Today
On 17.02.2021 16:34, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
>> On 17 Feb 2021, at 02:00, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>> Today Linux uses the swiotlb-xen driver (drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c) to
>> translate addresses for DMA operations in Dom0. Specifically,
>> swiotlb-xen is used to translate the address of a foreig
Andrew Cooper writes ("[PATCH 3/3] tools/libxl: Rework invariants in
libxl__domain_get_device_model_uid()"):
> Various version of gcc, when compiling with -Og, complain:
>
> libxl_dm.c: In function 'libxl__domain_get_device_model_uid':
> libxl_dm.c:256:12: error: 'kill_by_uid' may be used uni
flight 159419 xen-4.13-testing real [real]
flight 159446 xen-4.13-testing real-retest [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/159419/
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/159446/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking):
t
On 17/02/2021 17:50, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Andrew Cooper writes ("[PATCH 3/3] tools/libxl: Rework invariants in
> libxl__domain_get_device_model_uid()"):
>> Various version of gcc, when compiling with -Og, complain:
>>
>> libxl_dm.c: In function 'libxl__domain_get_device_model_uid':
>> libxl_dm
On Samstag, 13. Februar 2021 16:36:24 CET Maximilian Engelhardt wrote:
> Here are some things I noticed while trying to debug this issue:
>
> * It happens on a Debian buster dom0 as well as on a bullseye dom0
>
> * It seems to only affect pvh vms.
>
> * shutdown from the pvgrub menu ("c" -> "hal
flight 159445 xen-unstable-smoke real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/159445/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt 15 migrate-support-checkfail never pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl 1
flight 159420 xen-4.14-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/159420/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 16 saverestore-support-checkfail like 158558
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-win7-am
Hi!
>
> diff --git a/kernel/power/swap.c b/kernel/power/swap.c
> index c73f2e295167..e92e36c053a6 100644
> --- a/kernel/power/swap.c
> +++ b/kernel/power/swap.c
> @@ -271,13 +271,12 @@ static int hib_submit_io(int op, int op_flags, pgoff_t
> page_off, void *addr,
> struct hib_bio_ba
Cleber Rosa writes:
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 05:19:45PM +, Alex Bennée wrote:
>> These tests make sure we can boot the Xen hypervisor with a Dom0
>> kernel using the guest-loader. We currently have to use a kernel I
>> built myself because there are issues using the Debian kernel images.
>
+IanJ
On Wed, 17 Feb 2021, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
> Hi Rahul,
>
>
> > On 17 Feb 2021, at 10:05, Rahul Singh wrote:
> >
> > SMMUv3 driver does not handle multiple StreamId if the master device
> > supports more than one StreamID.
> >
> > This bug was introduced when the driver was ported from
On Wed, 17 Feb 2021, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 16.02.2021 19:31, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Mon, 15 Feb 2021, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> On 13.02.2021 14:50, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 06:05:40PM -0800, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> If rombios, seabios and o
On Wed, 17 Feb 2021, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 17/02/2021 02:00, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Today Linux uses the swiotlb-xen driver (drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c) to
> > translate addresses for DMA operations in Dom0. Specifically,
> > swiotlb-xen is used to translate the address of
On 2/17/21 14:03, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>> diff --git a/kernel/power/swap.c b/kernel/power/swap.c
>> index c73f2e295167..e92e36c053a6 100644
>> --- a/kernel/power/swap.c
>> +++ b/kernel/power/swap.c
>> @@ -271,13 +271,12 @@ static int hib_submit_io(int op, int op_flags, pgoff_t
>> page_off, vo
flight 159424 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/159424/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-armhf-armhf-xl-rtds 18 guest-start/debian.repeatfail like 159335
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-debianhvm-
flight 159437 libvirt real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/159437/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-armhf-libvirt 6 libvirt-buildfail REGR. vs. 151777
build-amd64-libvirt
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 05:19:45PM +, Alex Bennée wrote:
> These tests make sure we can boot the Xen hypervisor with a Dom0
> kernel using the guest-loader. We currently have to use a kernel I
> built myself because there are issues using the Debian kernel images.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Benné
On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 12:29 AM Jürgen Groß wrote:
> On 17.02.21 09:12, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> > Hi Jürgen, thanks for taking a look at this. A few comments below:
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 10:47 PM Jürgen Groß wrote:
> >>
> >> On 16.02.21 21:34, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> >>> + x86 m
81 matches
Mail list logo
