Re: Recent upgrade of 4.13 -> 4.14 issue

2020-12-16 Thread Jan Beulich
On 15.12.2020 20:08, Liwei wrote: > Hi list, > This is a reply to the thread of the same title (linked here: > https://www.mail-archive.com/xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org/msg84916.html > ) which I could not reply to because I receive this list by digest. > > I'm unclear if this is exactly

Re: [PATCH v2] xen/xenbus: make xs_talkv() interruptible

2020-12-16 Thread Jürgen Groß
On 15.12.20 21:59, Andrew Cooper wrote: On 15/12/2020 11:10, Juergen Gross wrote: In case a process waits for any Xenstore action in the xenbus driver it should be interruptible by signals. Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross --- V2: - don't special case SIGKILL as libxenstore is handling -EINTR fine

[xen-unstable-smoke test] 157598: regressions - FAIL

2020-12-16 Thread osstest service owner
flight 157598 xen-unstable-smoke real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/157598/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-amd64-libvirt 6 libvirt-buildfail REGR. vs. 157560 Tests which

Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] x86: major paravirt cleanup

2020-12-16 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 06:38:02PM -0600, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 03:54:08PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > The problem is that a single instance of unwind information (ORC) must > > capture and correctly unwind all alternatives. Since the trivially > > correct mandate is

[xen-unstable-coverity test] 157602: all pass - PUSHED

2020-12-16 Thread osstest service owner
flight 157602 xen-unstable-coverity real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/157602/ Perfect :-) All tests in this flight passed as required version targeted for testing: xen 904148ecb4a59d4c8375d8e8d38117b8605e10ac baseline version: xen 8e0f

[xen-4.10-testing test] 157565: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED

2020-12-16 Thread osstest service owner
flight 157565 xen-4.10-testing real [real] flight 157601 xen-4.10-testing real-retest [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/157565/ http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/157601/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking): t

Re: [xen-unstable-smoke bisection] complete build-amd64-libvirt

2020-12-16 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 16/12/2020 02:27, osstest service owner wrote: > branch xen-unstable-smoke > xenbranch xen-unstable-smoke > job build-amd64-libvirt > testid libvirt-build > > Tree: libvirt git://xenbits.xen.org/libvirt.git > Tree: libvirt_keycodemapdb https://gitlab.com/keycodemap/keycodemapdb.git > Tree: qemu

Re: [xen-unstable-smoke bisection] complete build-amd64-libvirt

2020-12-16 Thread Wei Liu
Paul, are you able to cook up a patch today? If not I will revert the offending patch(es). Wei. On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 10:17:29AM +, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 16/12/2020 02:27, osstest service owner wrote: > > branch xen-unstable-smoke > > xenbranch xen-unstable-smoke > > job build-amd64-lib

Re: [PATCH v10 04/25] tools/libxenevtchn: add possibility to not close file descriptor on exec

2020-12-16 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 16/12/2020 06:06, Jürgen Groß wrote: > On 15.12.20 19:09, Andrew Cooper wrote:  >> >> Additionally, something in core.c should check for unknown flags and >> reject them them with EINVAL.  It was buggy that this wasn't done >> before, and really needs to be implemented before we start having cas

Re: [PATCH v10 04/25] tools/libxenevtchn: add possibility to not close file descriptor on exec

2020-12-16 Thread Jürgen Groß
On 16.12.20 12:22, Andrew Cooper wrote: On 16/12/2020 06:06, Jürgen Groß wrote: On 15.12.20 19:09, Andrew Cooper wrote: Additionally, something in core.c should check for unknown flags and reject them them with EINVAL.  It was buggy that this wasn't done before, and really needs to be implemen

[xen-unstable-smoke test] 157600: regressions - FAIL

2020-12-16 Thread osstest service owner
flight 157600 xen-unstable-smoke real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/157600/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-amd64-libvirt 6 libvirt-buildfail REGR. vs. 157560 Tests which

Re: Recent upgrade of 4.13 -> 4.14 issue

2020-12-16 Thread Liwei
Hi Jan, Response inline... Liwei On Wed, 16 Dec 2020 at 16:12, Jan Beulich wrote: > > On 15.12.2020 20:08, Liwei wrote: > > Hi list, > > This is a reply to the thread of the same title (linked here: > > https://www.mail-archive.com/xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org/msg84916.html > > ) which

Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] block: Avoid processing BDS twice in bdrv_set_aio_context_ignore()

2020-12-16 Thread Kevin Wolf
Am 15.12.2020 um 18:23 hat Sergio Lopez geschrieben: > On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 04:01:19PM +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote: > > Am 15.12.2020 um 14:15 hat Sergio Lopez geschrieben: > > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 01:12:33PM +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote: > > > > Am 14.12.2020 um 18:05 hat Sergio Lopez geschrieben:

[xen-4.11-testing test] 157566: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED

2020-12-16 Thread osstest service owner
flight 157566 xen-4.11-testing real [real] flight 157605 xen-4.11-testing real-retest [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/157566/ http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/157605/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking): t

Re: Recent upgrade of 4.13 -> 4.14 issue

2020-12-16 Thread Jan Beulich
On 16.12.2020 13:19, Liwei wrote: > On Wed, 16 Dec 2020 at 16:12, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 15.12.2020 20:08, Liwei wrote: >>> Hi list, >>> This is a reply to the thread of the same title (linked here: >>> https://www.mail-archive.com/xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org/msg84916.html >>> ) which I c

[PATCH] xen: Kconfig: remove X86_64 depends from XEN_512GB

2020-12-16 Thread Jason Andryuk
commit bfda93aee0ec ("xen: Kconfig: nest Xen guest options") accidentally re-added X86_64 as a dependency to XEN_512GB. It was originally removed in commit a13f2ef168cb ("x86/xen: remove 32-bit Xen PV guest support"). Remove it again. Fixes: bfda93aee0ec ("xen: Kconfig: nest Xen guest options")

Re: [openxt-dev] Re: Follow up on libxl-fix-reboot.patch

2020-12-16 Thread Jason Andryuk
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 5:22 PM Chris Rogers wrote: > > Hopefully I can provide a little more context. Here is a link to the patch: > > https://github.com/OpenXT/xenclient-oe/blob/master/recipes-extended/xen/files/libxl-fix-reboot.patch > > The patch is a bit mis-named. It does not implement >

Re: [openxt-dev] Re: Follow up on libxl-fix-reboot.patch

2020-12-16 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 16/12/2020 14:14, Jason Andryuk wrote: > On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 5:22 PM Chris Rogers wrote: >> Hopefully I can provide a little more context. Here is a link to the patch: >> >> https://github.com/OpenXT/xenclient-oe/blob/master/recipes-extended/xen/files/libxl-fix-reboot.patch >> >> The patch

Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] block: Avoid processing BDS twice in bdrv_set_aio_context_ignore()

2020-12-16 Thread Sergio Lopez
On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 01:35:14PM +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote: > Am 15.12.2020 um 18:23 hat Sergio Lopez geschrieben: > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 04:01:19PM +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote: > > > Am 15.12.2020 um 14:15 hat Sergio Lopez geschrieben: > > > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 01:12:33PM +0100, Kevin Wolf

Re: [PATCH] xen: Kconfig: remove X86_64 depends from XEN_512GB

2020-12-16 Thread Jürgen Groß
On 16.12.20 15:08, Jason Andryuk wrote: commit bfda93aee0ec ("xen: Kconfig: nest Xen guest options") accidentally re-added X86_64 as a dependency to XEN_512GB. It was originally removed in commit a13f2ef168cb ("x86/xen: remove 32-bit Xen PV guest support"). Remove it again. Fixes: bfda93aee0ec

[xen-unstable-smoke test] 157606: regressions - FAIL

2020-12-16 Thread osstest service owner
flight 157606 xen-unstable-smoke real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/157606/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-amd64-libvirt 6 libvirt-buildfail REGR. vs. 157560 Tests which

Re: [PATCH v3 2/8] xen/hypfs: switch write function handles to const

2020-12-16 Thread Jan Beulich
On 09.12.2020 17:09, Juergen Gross wrote: > --- a/xen/include/xen/guest_access.h > +++ b/xen/include/xen/guest_access.h > @@ -26,6 +26,11 @@ > type *_x = (hnd).p; \ > (XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(type)) { _x }; \ > }) > +/* Same for casting to a const type. */ > +

Re: [PATCH v3 3/8] xen/hypfs: add new enter() and exit() per node callbacks

2020-12-16 Thread Jan Beulich
On 09.12.2020 17:09, Juergen Gross wrote: > In order to better support resource allocation and locking for dynamic > hypfs nodes add enter() and exit() callbacks to struct hypfs_funcs. > > The enter() callback is called when entering a node during hypfs user > actions (traversing, reading or writi

Re: [PATCH v3 2/8] xen/hypfs: switch write function handles to const

2020-12-16 Thread Jürgen Groß
On 16.12.20 17:08, Jan Beulich wrote: On 09.12.2020 17:09, Juergen Gross wrote: --- a/xen/include/xen/guest_access.h +++ b/xen/include/xen/guest_access.h @@ -26,6 +26,11 @@ type *_x = (hnd).p; \ (XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(type)) { _x }; \ }) +/* Same for c

Re: [PATCH v3 3/8] xen/hypfs: add new enter() and exit() per node callbacks

2020-12-16 Thread Jürgen Groß
On 16.12.20 17:16, Jan Beulich wrote: On 09.12.2020 17:09, Juergen Gross wrote: In order to better support resource allocation and locking for dynamic hypfs nodes add enter() and exit() callbacks to struct hypfs_funcs. The enter() callback is called when entering a node during hypfs user action

Re: [PATCH v3 2/8] xen/hypfs: switch write function handles to const

2020-12-16 Thread Jan Beulich
On 16.12.2020 17:17, Jürgen Groß wrote: > On 16.12.20 17:08, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 09.12.2020 17:09, Juergen Gross wrote: >>> --- a/xen/include/xen/guest_access.h >>> +++ b/xen/include/xen/guest_access.h >>> @@ -26,6 +26,11 @@ >>> type *_x = (hnd).p; \ >>> (XE

Re: [PATCH v3 3/8] xen/hypfs: add new enter() and exit() per node callbacks

2020-12-16 Thread Jan Beulich
On 16.12.2020 17:24, Jürgen Groß wrote: > On 16.12.20 17:16, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 09.12.2020 17:09, Juergen Gross wrote: >>> In order to better support resource allocation and locking for dynamic >>> hypfs nodes add enter() and exit() callbacks to struct hypfs_funcs. >>> >>> The enter() callbac

Xen Security Advisory 322 v5 (CVE-2020-29481) - Xenstore: new domains inheriting existing node permissions

2020-12-16 Thread Xen . org security team
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Xen Security Advisory CVE-2020-29481 / XSA-322 version 5 Xenstore: new domains inheriting existing node permissions UPDATES IN VERSION 5 Fix deployment info to refer to xsa322-

Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] x86: major paravirt cleanup

2020-12-16 Thread Josh Poimboeuf
On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 09:40:59AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > So much algorithm. > > :-) > > It's not really hard, but it has a few pesky details (as always). It really hurt my brain to look at it. > > Could we make it easier by caching the shared > > per-alt-group CFI state somewhere alo

Xen Security Advisory 358 v5 (CVE-2020-29570) - FIFO event channels control block related ordering

2020-12-16 Thread Xen . org security team
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Xen Security Advisory CVE-2020-29570 / XSA-358 version 5 FIFO event channels control block related ordering UPDATES IN VERSION 5 "Unstable" patch updated (needed re-basing).

Re: [PATCH v3 3/8] xen/hypfs: add new enter() and exit() per node callbacks

2020-12-16 Thread Jürgen Groß
On 16.12.20 17:36, Jan Beulich wrote: On 16.12.2020 17:24, Jürgen Groß wrote: On 16.12.20 17:16, Jan Beulich wrote: On 09.12.2020 17:09, Juergen Gross wrote: In order to better support resource allocation and locking for dynamic hypfs nodes add enter() and exit() callbacks to struct hypfs_func

Re: [PATCH v3 1/8] xen/cpupool: support moving domain between cpupools with different granularity

2020-12-16 Thread Dario Faggioli
On Wed, 2020-12-09 at 17:09 +0100, Juergen Gross wrote: > When moving a domain between cpupools with different scheduling > granularity the sched_units of the domain need to be adjusted. > > Do that by allocating new sched_units and throwing away the old ones > in sched_move_domain(). > > Signed-

Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] x86: major paravirt cleanup

2020-12-16 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 10:56:05AM -0600, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 09:40:59AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > Could we make it easier by caching the shared > > > per-alt-group CFI state somewhere along the way? > > > > Yes, but when I tried it grew the code required. Run

Re: [xen-unstable-smoke bisection] complete build-amd64-libvirt

2020-12-16 Thread Wei Liu
On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 10:43:57AM +, Wei Liu wrote: > Paul, are you able to cook up a patch today? If not I will revert the > offending patch(es). > I've reverted the offending 8 patches for now. Wei.

[libvirt test] 157593: regressions - FAIL

2020-12-16 Thread osstest service owner
flight 157593 libvirt real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/157593/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-i386-libvirt6 libvirt-buildfail REGR. vs. 151777 build-arm64-libvirt

[xen-unstable-smoke test] 157609: regressions - FAIL

2020-12-16 Thread osstest service owner
flight 157609 xen-unstable-smoke real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/157609/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-amd64-libvirt 6 libvirt-buildfail REGR. vs. 157560 Tests which

Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] block: Avoid processing BDS twice in bdrv_set_aio_context_ignore()

2020-12-16 Thread Kevin Wolf
Am 16.12.2020 um 15:55 hat Sergio Lopez geschrieben: > On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 01:35:14PM +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote: > > Am 15.12.2020 um 18:23 hat Sergio Lopez geschrieben: > > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 04:01:19PM +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote: > > > > Am 15.12.2020 um 14:15 hat Sergio Lopez geschrieben:

Re: Xen-ARM DomUs

2020-12-16 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020, Elliott Mitchell wrote: > On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 08:36:34AM -0800, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > On Mon, 14 Dec 2020, Elliott Mitchell wrote: > > > The available examples seem geared towards Linux DomUs. I'm looking at a > > > FreeBSD installation image and it appears to expe

Re: [GIT PULL] xen: branch for v5.11-rc1

2020-12-16 Thread pr-tracker-bot
The pull request you sent on Tue, 15 Dec 2020 13:26:06 +0100: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/xen/tip.git > for-linus-5.11-rc1-tag has been merged into torvalds/linux.git: https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/c/7acfd4274e26e05a4f12ad31bf331fef11ebc6a3 Thank you! -- Deet-doot-dot, I

[ovmf test] 157571: regressions - FAIL

2020-12-16 Thread osstest service owner
flight 157571 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/157571/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 12 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 157345 test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu

[qemu-mainline test] 157569: regressions - FAIL

2020-12-16 Thread osstest service owner
flight 157569 qemu-mainline real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/157569/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-vhd 19 guest-start/debian.repeat fail REGR. vs. 152631 test-amd64-i386-

[xen-unstable-smoke test] 157611: tolerable all pass - PUSHED

2020-12-16 Thread osstest service owner
flight 157611 xen-unstable-smoke real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/157611/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-amd64-amd64-libvirt 15 migrate-support-checkfail never pass test-arm64-arm64-xl-xsm 1

[xen-unstable test] 157568: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED

2020-12-16 Thread osstest service owner
flight 157568 xen-unstable real [real] flight 157614 xen-unstable real-retest [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/157568/ http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/157614/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking): test-amd6

[linux-linus test] 157573: regressions - FAIL

2020-12-16 Thread osstest service owner
flight 157573 linux-linus real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/157573/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ws16-amd64 7 xen-install fail REGR. vs. 152332 test-amd64-i386-xl-

Re: XSA-351 causing Solaris-11 systems to panic during boot.

2020-12-16 Thread boris . ostrovsky
On 11/17/20 3:12 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 16.11.2020 22:57, Cheyenne Wills wrote: >> Running Xen with XSA-351 is causing Solaris 11 systems to panic during >> boot. The panic screen is showing the failure to be coming from >> "unix:rdmsr". The panic occurs with existing guests (booting off a

Re: arm32 tools/flask build failure

2020-12-16 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > Hi all, > > I am building Xen tools for ARM32 using qemu-user. I am getting the > following error building tools/flask. Everything else works fine. It is > worth noting that make -j1 works fine, it is only make -j4 that fails. > > I played with .NO

Re: [openxt-dev] Re: Follow up on libxl-fix-reboot.patch

2020-12-16 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Wed, 16 Dec 2020, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 16/12/2020 14:14, Jason Andryuk wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 5:22 PM Chris Rogers wrote: > >> Hopefully I can provide a little more context. Here is a link to the > >> patch: > >> > >> https://github.com/OpenXT/xenclient-oe/blob/master/recipes

[xen-4.12-testing test] 157594: regressions - FAIL

2020-12-16 Thread osstest service owner
flight 157594 xen-4.12-testing real [real] flight 157623 xen-4.12-testing real-retest [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/157594/ http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/157623/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could

[xen-unstable-smoke test] 157621: tolerable all pass - PUSHED

2020-12-16 Thread osstest service owner
flight 157621 xen-unstable-smoke real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/157621/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-amd64-amd64-libvirt 15 migrate-support-checkfail never pass test-arm64-arm64-xl-xsm 1

[xen-4.13-testing test] 157597: regressions - FAIL

2020-12-16 Thread osstest service owner
flight 157597 xen-4.13-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/157597/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 12 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 157135 Tests which

Re: XSA-351 causing Solaris-11 systems to panic during boot.

2020-12-16 Thread Jan Beulich
On 17.12.2020 02:51, boris.ostrov...@oracle.com wrote: > > On 11/17/20 3:12 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 16.11.2020 22:57, Cheyenne Wills wrote: >>> Running Xen with XSA-351 is causing Solaris 11 systems to panic during >>> boot. The panic screen is showing the failure to be coming from >>> "unix

Re: [PATCH v3 1/8] xen/cpupool: support moving domain between cpupools with different granularity

2020-12-16 Thread Jan Beulich
On 16.12.2020 18:52, Dario Faggioli wrote: > On Wed, 2020-12-09 at 17:09 +0100, Juergen Gross wrote: >> When moving a domain between cpupools with different scheduling >> granularity the sched_units of the domain need to be adjusted. >> >> Do that by allocating new sched_units and throwing away the

Re: [PATCH v3 1/8] xen/cpupool: support moving domain between cpupools with different granularity

2020-12-16 Thread Jürgen Groß
On 17.12.20 08:49, Jan Beulich wrote: On 16.12.2020 18:52, Dario Faggioli wrote: On Wed, 2020-12-09 at 17:09 +0100, Juergen Gross wrote: When moving a domain between cpupools with different scheduling granularity the sched_units of the domain need to be adjusted. Do that by allocating new sche