[linux-linus test] 156909: regressions - FAIL

2020-11-21 Thread osstest service owner
flight 156909 linux-linus real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/156909/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-dmrestrict-amd64-dmrestrict 7 xen-install fail REGR. vs. 152332 test-amd

[libvirt test] 156915: regressions - FAIL

2020-11-21 Thread osstest service owner
flight 156915 libvirt real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/156915/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-amd64-libvirt 6 libvirt-buildfail REGR. vs. 151777 build-armhf-libvirt

[ovmf test] 156913: all pass - PUSHED

2020-11-21 Thread osstest service owner
flight 156913 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/156913/ Perfect :-) All tests in this flight passed as required version targeted for testing: ovmf 47343af30435302c087027177613412a1a83e919 baseline version: ovmf 6c8dd15c4ae42501438a5

Re: [PATCH v2] xen: EXPERT clean-up and introduce UNSUPPORTED

2020-11-21 Thread Rich Persaud
 On Nov 20, 2020, at 05:09, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 19.11.2020 22:40, Stefano Stabellini wrote: >> On Thu, 19 Nov 2020, Jan Beulich wrote: >>> On 18.11.2020 22:00, Stefano Stabellini wrote: On Wed, 18 Nov 2020, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 18.11.2020 01:50, Stefano Stabellini wrote: >>

[qemu-mainline test] 156912: regressions - FAIL

2020-11-21 Thread osstest service owner
flight 156912 qemu-mainline real [real] flight 156923 qemu-mainline real-retest [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/156912/ http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/156923/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be

[ovmf test] 156920: all pass - PUSHED

2020-11-21 Thread osstest service owner
flight 156920 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/156920/ Perfect :-) All tests in this flight passed as required version targeted for testing: ovmf e7bd0dd26db7e56aa8ca70132d6ea916ee6f3db0 baseline version: ovmf 47343af30435302c08702

Re: [PATCH 14/20] block: remove the nr_sects field in struct hd_struct

2020-11-21 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 09:05:48PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote: > The code is already switched to it AFAICT (the lock is really only used in > the two places that write i_size). But the problem is that in theory two > i_size_write() calls can race in a way that the resulting stored i_size is a > mix of t

[RFC] MAINTAINERS tag for cleanup robot

2020-11-21 Thread trix
A difficult part of automating commits is composing the subsystem preamble in the commit log. For the ongoing effort of a fixer producing one or two fixes a release the use of 'treewide:' does not seem appropriate. It would be better if the normal prefix was used. Unfortunately normal is not con

Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS tag for cleanup robot

2020-11-21 Thread Joe Perches
On Sat, 2020-11-21 at 08:50 -0800, t...@redhat.com wrote: > A difficult part of automating commits is composing the subsystem > preamble in the commit log. For the ongoing effort of a fixer producing > one or two fixes a release the use of 'treewide:' does not seem appropriate. > > It would be be

Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS tag for cleanup robot

2020-11-21 Thread James Bottomley
On Sat, 2020-11-21 at 08:50 -0800, t...@redhat.com wrote: > A difficult part of automating commits is composing the subsystem > preamble in the commit log. For the ongoing effort of a fixer > producing > one or two fixes a release the use of 'treewide:' does not seem > appropriate. > > It would b

[xen-unstable test] 156918: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED

2020-11-21 Thread osstest service owner
flight 156918 xen-unstable real [real] flight 156927 xen-unstable real-retest [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/156918/ http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/156927/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking): test-amd6

Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS tag for cleanup robot

2020-11-21 Thread Joe Perches
On Sat, 2020-11-21 at 09:18 -0800, James Bottomley wrote: > On Sat, 2020-11-21 at 08:50 -0800, t...@redhat.com wrote: > > A difficult part of automating commits is composing the subsystem > > preamble in the commit log. For the ongoing effort of a fixer > > producing one or two fixes a release the

[linux-linus test] 156919: regressions - FAIL

2020-11-21 Thread osstest service owner
flight 156919 linux-linus real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/156919/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-dmrestrict-amd64-dmrestrict 7 xen-install fail REGR. vs. 152332 test-amd

[qemu-mainline test] 156925: regressions - FAIL

2020-11-21 Thread osstest service owner
flight 156925 qemu-mainline real [real] flight 156932 qemu-mainline real-retest [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/156925/ http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/156932/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be

[linux-linus test] 156929: regressions - FAIL

2020-11-21 Thread osstest service owner
flight 156929 linux-linus real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/156929/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-xl-xsm7 xen-install fail REGR. vs. 152332 test-amd64-i386-xl-

Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS tag for cleanup robot

2020-11-21 Thread Matthew Wilcox
On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 08:50:58AM -0800, t...@redhat.com wrote: > The fixer review is > https://reviews.llvm.org/D91789 > > A run over allyesconfig for x86_64 finds 62 issues, 5 are false positives. > The false positives are caused by macros passed to other macros and by > some macro expansions t

Re: [PATCH v2 05/12] x86: rework arch_local_irq_restore() to not use popf

2020-11-21 Thread Jürgen Groß
On 20.11.20 12:59, Peter Zijlstra wrote: On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 12:46:23PM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote: +static __always_inline void arch_local_irq_restore(unsigned long flags) +{ + if (!arch_irqs_disabled_flags(flags)) + arch_local_irq_enable(); +} If someone were to write

[libvirt test] 156938: regressions - trouble: blocked/fail/pass/starved

2020-11-21 Thread osstest service owner
flight 156938 libvirt real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/156938/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-amd64-libvirt 6 libvirt-buildfail REGR. vs. 151777 build-i386-libvirt