flight 153789 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/153789/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i386-xsm6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 152863
build-amd64-xsm
flight 153776 qemu-mainline real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/153776/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i3866 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 152631
build-amd64
flight 153783 libvirt real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/153783/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i386-xsm6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 151777
build-arm64-libvirt
flight 153791 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/153791/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i386-xsm6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 152863
build-amd64-xsm
flight 153795 xen-unstable-coverity real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/153795/
Perfect :-)
All tests in this flight passed as required
version targeted for testing:
xen f4c1a541fa351e4f613471bbf397931f9e1ddd27
baseline version:
xen afe0
flight 153771 linux-5.4 real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/153771/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i386-xsm6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 152853
build-i386
flight 153778 linux-linus real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/153778/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i3866 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 152332
build-amd64-xsm
flight 153796 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/153796/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i386-xsm6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 152863
build-amd64-xsm
flight 153805 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/153805/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i386-xsm6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 152863
build-amd64-xsm
branch xen-unstable
xenbranch xen-unstable
job test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-i386
testid guest-saverestore
Tree: linux git://xenbits.xen.org/linux-pvops.git
Tree: linuxfirmware git://xenbits.xen.org/osstest/linux-firmware.git
Tree: qemu git://xenbits.xen.org/qemu-xen-traditional.git
Tree: qemuu git://
flight 153807 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/153807/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i386-xsm6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 152863
build-amd64-xsm
flight 153788 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/153788/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-i386 14 guest-saverestore fail REGR. vs. 152877
test-amd64-i386-xl
flight 153810 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/153810/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i386-xsm6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 152863
build-amd64-xsm
flight 153814 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/153814/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i386-xsm6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 152863
build-amd64-xsm
flight 153793 qemu-mainline real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/153793/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i3866 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 152631
build-amd64
On Sat, Sep 5, 2020 at 9:44 PM Juergen Gross wrote:
>
> It contains a small series for fixing a problem with Xen PVH guests
> when running as backends (e.g. as dom0). Mapping other guests' memory
> now is working via ZONE_DEVICE, thus not requiring to abuse the memory
> hotplug functionality for t
flight 153819 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/153819/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i386-xsm6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 152863
build-amd64-xsm
The pull request you sent on Sun, 6 Sep 2020 06:44:33 +0200:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/xen/tip.git
> for-linus-5.9-rc4-tag
has been merged into torvalds/linux.git:
https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/c/68beef571071014ef34a3beac65fe2af7e8e3cf6
Thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I
flight 153803 linux-linus real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/153803/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i3866 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 152332
build-amd64-xsm
flight 153799 linux-5.4 real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/153799/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i386-xsm6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 152853
build-i386
flight 153822 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/153822/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i386-xsm6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 152863
build-amd64-xsm
flight 153828 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/153828/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i386-xsm6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 152863
build-amd64-xsm
flight 153832 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/153832/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i386-xsm6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 152863
build-amd64-xsm
branch xen-unstable
xenbranch xen-unstable
job test-amd64-i386-xl-shadow
testid guest-saverestore
Tree: linux git://xenbits.xen.org/linux-pvops.git
Tree: linuxfirmware git://xenbits.xen.org/osstest/linux-firmware.git
Tree: qemu git://xenbits.xen.org/qemu-xen-traditional.git
Tree: qemuu git://xenbi
flight 153835 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/153835/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i386-xsm6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 152863
build-amd64-xsm
flight 153837 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/153837/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i386-xsm6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 152863
build-amd64-xsm
flight 153840 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/153840/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i386-xsm6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 152863
build-amd64-xsm
flight 153813 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/153813/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-i386 14 guest-saverestore fail REGR. vs. 152877
test-amd64-i386-xl
flight 153842 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/153842/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i386-xsm6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 152863
build-amd64-xsm
flight 153818 qemu-mainline real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/153818/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i3866 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 152631
build-amd64
flight 153846 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/153846/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i386-xsm6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 152863
build-amd64-xsm
> From: Roger Pau Monne
> Sent: Tuesday, September 1, 2020 6:55 PM
>
> Such handling consist in checking that no bits have been changed from
> the read value, if that's the case silently drop the write, otherwise
> inject a fault.
>
> At least Windows guests will expect to write to the MISC_ENAB
> From: Roger Pau Monne
> Sent: Tuesday, September 1, 2020 6:55 PM
>
> From: Andrew Cooper
>
> Change the catch-all behavior for MSR not explicitly handled. Instead
> of allow full read-access to the MSR space and silently dropping
> writes return an exception when the MSR is not explicitly han
flight 153848 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/153848/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i386-xsm6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 152863
build-amd64-xsm
On 06.09.20 19:01, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Sat, Sep 5, 2020 at 9:44 PM Juergen Gross wrote:
It contains a small series for fixing a problem with Xen PVH guests
when running as backends (e.g. as dom0). Mapping other guests' memory
now is working via ZONE_DEVICE, thus not requiring to abuse the
flight 153850 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/153850/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i386-xsm6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 152863
build-amd64-xsm
flight 153826 linux-linus real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/153826/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 152332
build-i386
On 05.09.2020 07:17, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 08:01:30AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> I'm aware, and hence I said "aim for". In cases like this what we
>> often do is adjust things incrementally, as lines get touched anyway.
>> Of course if you want to clean it up all in on
On 04.09.2020 23:03, Sergei Temerkhanov wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 12:47 PM Jan Beulich wrote:
>>
>> On 04.09.2020 01:24, Sergey Temerkhanov wrote:
>>> --- a/xen/common/efi/boot.c
>>> +++ b/xen/common/efi/boot.c
>>> @@ -1521,7 +1521,9 @@ void __init efi_init_memory(void)
>>
>> Looking at the
Add max_segment argument to drm_prime_pages_to_sg(). When set pass it
through to the __sg_alloc_table_from_pages() call, otherwise use
SCATTERLIST_MAX_SEGMENT.
Also add max_segment field to drm driver and pass it to
drm_prime_pages_to_sg() calls in drivers and helpers.
v2: place max_segment in d
> > + /**
> > +* @max_segment:
> > +*
> > +* Max size for scatter list segments. When unset the default
> > +* (SCATTERLIST_MAX_SEGMENT) is used.
> > +*/
> > + size_t max_segment;
>
> Is there no better place for this then "at the bottom"? drm_device is a
> huge structure,
41 matches
Mail list logo
