> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Beulich
> Sent: 02 September 2020 07:09
> To: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
> Cc: Ian Jackson ; Wei Liu ; Paul Durrant
>
> Subject: [PATCH v2] tools/hotplug/Linux: don't needlessly use non-standard
> features in vif-
> {bridge,route}
>
> We're not afte
flight 153534 libvirt real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/153534/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-arm64-libvirt 6 libvirt-buildfail REGR. vs. 151777
build-i386
Hi,
A gentle ping to have a review/ack on this serie :-)
(Adding some people in CC)
Bertrand
> On 20 Aug 2020, at 11:46, Diego Sueiro wrote:
>
> This patch series fixes issues around the vif-nat script when
> setting up the vif interface and dhcp server in dom0.
>
> It has been validated and
flight 153541 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/153541/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i386-xsm6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 152863
build-amd64-xsm
flight 153531 qemu-mainline real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/153531/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i3866 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 152631
build-amd64-xsm
flight 153545 xen-unstable-coverity real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/153545/
Perfect :-)
All tests in this flight passed as required
version targeted for testing:
xen afe018e041ec112d90a8b4e6ed607d22aa06f280
baseline version:
xen d400
On 21.08.20 12:34, David Hildenbrand wrote:
Let's reuse the new mechanism to merge system ram resources below the
root. We are the only one hotplugging system ram (e.g., DIMMs don't apply),
so this is safe to be used.
Cc: Andrew Morton
Cc: Michal Hocko
Cc: Boris Ostrovsky
Cc: Juergen Gross
C
flight 153546 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/153546/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i386-xsm6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 152863
build-amd64-xsm
> Am 02.09.2020 um 12:15 schrieb Jürgen Groß :
>
> On 21.08.20 12:34, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> Let's reuse the new mechanism to merge system ram resources below the
>> root. We are the only one hotplugging system ram (e.g., DIMMs don't apply),
>> so this is safe to be used.
>> Cc: Andrew Mo
flight 153526 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/153526/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 10 debian-hvm-install
fail REGR. vs. 152877
flight 153549 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/153549/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i386-xsm6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 152863
build-amd64-xsm
flight 153552 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/153552/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i386-xsm6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 152863
build-amd64-xsm
Hi,
It is mainly due to the business priority change. XenGT project was originally
created for data center usages with XEON E3 servers which have integrated
processor graphics. After SkyLake E3, there are no new servers capable of
running GVT-g, and Intel future graphics for data center will ha
flight 153542 linux-linus real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/153542/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i3866 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 152332
build-amd64-xsm
Why not new XenGT for new GPU?
Intel migrated to the KVM?
On Wednesday, September 2, 2020, 05:19:18 PM GMT+4:30, Lv, Zhiyuan
wrote:
Hi,
It is mainly due to the business priority change. XenGT project was originally
created for data center usages with XEON E3 servers which have integ
flight 153553 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/153553/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i386-xsm6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 152863
build-amd64-xsm
Please ignore this message.
Please ignore this email.
Please ignore this message.
flight 153548 qemu-mainline real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/153548/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i3866 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 152631
build-amd64-xsm
flight 153563 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/153563/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i386-xsm6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 152863
build-amd64-xsm
flight 153588 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/153588/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i386-xsm6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 152863
build-amd64-xsm
flight 153551 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/153551/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 10 debian-hvm-install
fail REGR. vs. 152877
flight 153555 linux-linus real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/153555/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i3866 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 152332
build-amd64-xsm
On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 5:48 AM Lv, Zhiyuan wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> It is mainly due to the business priority change. XenGT project was
> originally created for data center usages with XEON E3 servers which have
> integrated processor graphics. After SkyLake E3, there are no new servers
> capable of
flight 153590 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/153590/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i386-xsm6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 152863
build-amd64-xsm
flight 153594 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/153594/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i386-xsm6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 152863
build-amd64-xsm
On 8/31/2020 9:07 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
unmatched group
I just got to this today. The following work for me with python 3.4.6,
basically add an extra group that is not part of a conditional match:
From 0ee501b7491cf62e18a454dcebc12b1b6d36e9e9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Message-Id:
<0ee501b7
flight 153576 qemu-mainline real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/153576/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i3866 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 152631
build-amd64-xsm
flight 153595 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/153595/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i386-xsm6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 152863
build-amd64-xsm
Make the type checking macro name consistent with the TYPE_*
constant.
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost
---
Cc: Stefano Stabellini
Cc: Anthony Perard
Cc: Paul Durrant
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Cc: qemu-de...@nongnu.org
---
include/hw/xen/xen-legacy-backend.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 i
On 01/09/2020 11:54, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> @@ -517,6 +523,15 @@ int guest_wrmsr(struct vcpu *v, uint32_t msr, uint64_t
> val)
> wrmsr_tsc_aux(val);
> break;
>
> +case MSR_AMD64_DE_CFG:
> +/*
> + * OpenBSD 6.7 will panic if writing to DE_CFG triggers a
On 01/09/2020 11:54, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> Linux PV guests will attempt to read the FEATURE_CONTROL MSR, so move
> the handling done in VMX code into guest_rdmsr as it can be shared
> between PV and HVM guests that way.
>
> Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné
> ---
> Changes from v1:
> - Move the V
On 01/09/2020 11:54, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> @@ -1942,19 +1966,6 @@ static int svm_msr_read_intercept(unsigned int msr,
> uint64_t *msr_content)
> default:
> if ( rdmsr_safe(msr, *msr_content) == 0 )
> break;
> -
> -if ( boot_cpu_data.x86 == 0xf && msr == MSR_F1
flight 153599 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/153599/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i386-xsm6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 152863
build-amd64-xsm
flight 153591 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/153591/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 10 debian-hvm-install
fail REGR. vs. 152877
flight 153601 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/153601/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i386-xsm6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 152863
build-amd64-xsm
flight 153592 linux-linus real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/153592/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i3866 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 152332
build-amd64-xsm
flight 153604 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/153604/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i386-xsm6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 152863
build-amd64-xsm
flight 153606 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/153606/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i386-xsm6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 152863
build-amd64-xsm
On 02.09.2020 23:23, Don Slutz wrote:
> On 8/31/2020 9:07 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> unmatched group
>
> I just got to this today. The following work for me with python 3.4.6,
> basically add an extra group that is not part of a conditional match:
Oh, good, thanks. I'll fold this in once I've te
flight 153597 qemu-mainline real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/153597/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i3866 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 152631
build-amd64-xsm
flight 153608 libvirt real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/153608/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-arm64-libvirt 6 libvirt-buildfail REGR. vs. 151777
build-i386-xsm
43 matches
Mail list logo
