flight 149560 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/149560/
Perfect :-)
All tests in this flight passed as required
version targeted for testing:
ovmf e4004e8e505a9ca697b1d5aaee9b3ae25cdc3b21
baseline version:
ovmf d4bc5378e003e53a1c76d
So, first thanks for the quick comments even though some of my choices
were straight NAKs (or maybe because of that!)
Second, I clearly did a bad job of motivating the series. Let me try
to address the motivation comments first and then I can address the
technical concerns separately.
[ I'm coll
On 2020-04-08 5:08 a.m., Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 10:02:57PM -0700, Ankur Arora wrote:
A KVM host (or another hypervisor) might advertise paravirtualized
features and optimization hints (ex KVM_HINTS_REALTIME) which might
become stale over the lifetime of the guest. For inst
On 2020-04-08 5:28 a.m., Jürgen Groß wrote:
On 08.04.20 07:02, Ankur Arora wrote:
[ snip ]
Quite a lot of code churn and hacks for a problem which should not
occur on a well administrated machine.
Yeah, I agree the patch set is pretty large and clearly the NMI or
the stop_machine() are comple
On 2020-04-08 7:12 a.m., Thomas Gleixner wrote:
Ankur Arora writes:
A KVM host (or another hypervisor) might advertise paravirtualized
features and optimization hints (ex KVM_HINTS_REALTIME) which might
become stale over the lifetime of the guest. For instance, the
host might go from being unde
On 01/04/2020 16:44, Asaf Fisher wrote:
Hello!
Hello,
Apologies for the late answer.
Just wonder if this Open Work Item is still available?
https://wiki.xenproject.org/wiki/Xen_ARM_TODO
Yes, there was some effort in the past but this wasn't yet upstreamed. I
can point you to the existi
flight 149559 linux-linus real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/149559/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-examine 8 reboot fail REGR. vs. 149238
test-amd64-i386-xl-
flight 149564 qemu-mainline real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/149564/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-armhf-armhf-xl-rtds 16 guest-start/debian.repeat fail blocked in 149510
test-amd64-amd64-xl-rtds 18 gue
Hi Jan,
On 06/04/2020 14:24, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 04.04.2020 12:26, Julien Grall wrote:
From: Julien Grall
Since commit 9facd54a45 "x86/ioapic: Add register level checks to detect
bogus io-apic entries", Xen is able to cope with IO APICs not mapped in
the fixmap.
Therefore the whole logic t
Hi,
On 09/04/2020 08:52, Jürgen Groß wrote:
On 09.04.20 09:41, Jan Beulich wrote:
All,
the releases are due in a week or two. Please point out backports
you find missing from the respective staging branches, but which
you consider relevant. (Ian, I notice there haven't been any
tools side back
On 09/04/2020 08:41, Jan Beulich wrote:
All,
Hi Jan & Stefano,
the releases are due in a week or two. Please point out backports
you find missing from the respective staging branches, but which
you consider relevant. (Ian, I notice there haven't been any
tools side backports at all so far.
Fix sparse warning:
drivers/xen/pvcalls-back.c:30:3: warning:
symbol 'pvcalls_back_global' was not declared. Should it be static?
Reported-by: Hulk Robot
Signed-off-by: YueHaibing
---
drivers/xen/pvcalls-back.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/xen/pv
flight 149599 xen-unstable-smoke real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/149599/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt 13 migrate-support-checkfail never pass
test-arm64-arm64-xl-xsm 1
On Fri, 10 Apr 2020, YueHaibing wrote:
> Fix sparse warning:
>
> drivers/xen/pvcalls-back.c:30:3: warning:
> symbol 'pvcalls_back_global' was not declared. Should it be static?
>
> Reported-by: Hulk Robot
> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini
> ---
> drivers/xen/pvca
On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 01:54:40PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 06.04.2020 12:57, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> > --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/hap/hap.c
> > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/hap/hap.c
> > @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ int hap_track_dirty_vram(struct domain *d,
> > p2m_change_type_range(d, begin_pfn,
On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 11:30 AM Tamas K Lengyel
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 11:11 AM Wei Liu wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 10:59:55AM -0600, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
> > [...]
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > +/*
> > > > > > > + * The parent domain is expected to be crea
On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 10:05:50AM -0600, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 11:30 AM Tamas K Lengyel
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 11:11 AM Wei Liu wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 10:59:55AM -0600, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 10:19 AM Wei Liu wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 10:05:50AM -0600, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 11:30 AM Tamas K Lengyel
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 11:11 AM Wei Liu wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 10:59:55AM -0600,
flight 149565 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/149565/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking):
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 10 debian-hvm-install
fail in 149547 pass in 149565
test-
On Fri, 10 Apr 2020, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 09/04/2020 08:41, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > All,
>
> Hi Jan & Stefano,
>
> > the releases are due in a week or two. Please point out backports
> > you find missing from the respective staging branches, but which
> > you consider relevant. (Ian, I notice
Create a new document under docs/process to describe our special tags.
For now, only add the new backport tag.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini
Acked-by: Ian Jackson
Acked-by: Wei Liu
CC: jbeul...@suse.com
CC: george.dun...@citrix.com
CC: jul...@xen.org
CC: lars.ku...@citrix.com
CC: andrew.coo
flight 149590 libvirt real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/149590/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64-libvirt 6 libvirt-buildfail REGR. vs. 146182
build-i386-libvirt
flight 149602 xen-unstable-smoke real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/149602/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt 13 migrate-support-checkfail never pass
test-arm64-arm64-xl-xsm 1
Hi Stefano,
On 10/04/2020 17:49, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
Create a new document under docs/process to describe our special tags.
For now, only add the new backport tag.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini
Acked-by: Ian Jackson
Acked-by: Wei Liu
Acked-by: Julien Grall
It would be good to g
Hi Stefano,
On 10/04/2020 17:37, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Fri, 10 Apr 2020, Julien Grall wrote:
On 09/04/2020 08:41, Jan Beulich wrote:
All,
Hi Jan & Stefano,
the releases are due in a week or two. Please point out backports
you find missing from the respective staging branches, but wh
flight 149583 xen-4.12-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/149583/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qcow216 guest-saverestore.2 fail REGR. vs. 148185
Tests which ar
flight 149594 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/149594/
Perfect :-)
All tests in this flight passed as required
version targeted for testing:
ovmf a5d8a399635d86c8155a252874fbf3c0e6613d34
baseline version:
ovmf e4004e8e505a9ca697b1d
The pull request you sent on Fri, 10 Apr 2020 08:24:30 +0200:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/xen/tip.git
> for-linus-5.7-rc1b-tag
has been merged into torvalds/linux.git:
https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/c/e6383b185a998861cadb2f95d97cfe29945b9c32
Thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I
flight 149598 qemu-mainline real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/149598/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking):
test-amd64-amd64-xl-rtds 16 guest-localmigrate fail REGR. vs. 149564
Tests which did not succee
flight 149596 linux-linus real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/149596/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-examine 8 reboot fail REGR. vs. 149238
test-amd64-i386-xl-
flight 149604 xen-4.13-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/149604/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking):
test-amd64-amd64-xl-rtds 16 guest-localmigrate fail REGR. vs. 149553
Tests which did not suc
31 matches
Mail list logo
