flight 142673 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/142673/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 10 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 142423
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu
flight 142669 qemu-mainline real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/142669/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 10 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs.
140282
test-amd64-amd
flight 142698 xen-unstable-coverity real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/142698/
Perfect :-)
All tests in this flight passed as required
version targeted for testing:
xen fef8d99fbce1a5e7ddfd22b0f33940b8d6193ec8
baseline version:
xen 98d1
branch xen-unstable
xenbranch xen-unstable
job test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64
testid xen-boot
Tree: linux git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git
Tree: linuxfirmware git://xenbits.xen.org/osstest/linux-firmware.git
Tree: ovmf git://xenbits.xen.org/osstest/ovm
branch xen-unstable
xenbranch xen-unstable
job test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64
testid debian-hvm-install
Tree: linux git://xenbits.xen.org/linux-pvops.git
Tree: linuxfirmware git://xenbits.xen.org/osstest/linux-firmware.git
Tree: ovmf git://xenbits.xen.org/osstest/ovmf.git
Tree: qemu git
Am Sun, 13 Oct 2019 18:21:27 +0200
schrieb Samuel Thibault :
> > > cked-by: Daniel De Graaf
>
> Note that you miss an 'A' at the beginning of the line there.
Thanks for spotting.
Should I resend this patch?
Olaf
pgpgf6l4YQpvk.pgp
Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP
flight 142677 linux-linus real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/142677/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-libvirt-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-xsm broken in 142628
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-debi
flight 142683 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/142683/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking):
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 19 leak-check/check fail pass in 142642
Tests which did not succeed, but
flight 142685 linux-4.4 real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/142685/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-pvshim 20 guest-start/debian.repeat fail in 142648 REGR.
vs. 139698
Tests which
flight 142690 linux-4.14 real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/142690/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking):
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-i386-xsm 7 xen-boot fail in 142660 pass in
142690
test-arm64-arm64-examine 11
flight 142692 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/142692/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 10 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 142423
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu
flight 142695 qemu-mainline real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/142695/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 10 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs.
140282
test-amd64-i38
Samuel Thibault, le dim. 13 oct. 2019 18:20:39 +0200, a ecrit:
> Olaf Hering, le mer. 02 oct. 2019 19:05:36 +0200, a ecrit:
> > The function read_vtpmblk uses printf(3), but stdio.h is not included
> > in this file. This results in a warning from gcc-7:
> >
> > vtpmblk.c: In function 'read_vtpmblk
Olaf Hering, le mer. 02 oct. 2019 19:05:36 +0200, a ecrit:
> The function read_vtpmblk uses printf(3), but stdio.h is not included
> in this file. This results in a warning from gcc-7:
>
> vtpmblk.c: In function 'read_vtpmblk':
> vtpmblk.c:322:7: warning: implicit declaration of function 'printf'
Olaf Hering, le dim. 13 oct. 2019 18:50:32 +0200, a ecrit:
> Am Sun, 13 Oct 2019 18:21:27 +0200
> schrieb Samuel Thibault :
>
> > > > cked-by: Daniel De Graaf
> >
> > Note that you miss an 'A' at the beginning of the line there.
>
> Thanks for spotting.
>
> Should I resend this patch?
With
15 matches
Mail list logo