flight 140868 linux-4.19 real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/140868/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-pvshim 18 guest-localmigrate/x10 fail REGR. vs. 129313
build-armhf-pvops
flight 140886 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/140886/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-47 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 139876
test-amd64-amd64-x
flight 140912 xen-unstable-coverity real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/140912/
Perfect :-)
All tests in this flight passed as required
version targeted for testing:
xen b376456a78ce893036002186d1003900a3b8833d
baseline version:
xen 1027
flight 140890 linux-4.4 real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/140890/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-arm64-arm64-xl-credit1 broken in 140786
test-amd64-amd64-xl-pvshim 20 gue
>>> +# nested likely/unlikely calls
>>> + if ($line =~
>>> /\b(?:(?:un)?likely)\s*\(\s*!?\s*(IS_ERR(?:_OR_NULL|_VALUE)?|WARN)/) {
>>> + WARN("LIKELY_MISUSE",
>>
>> How do you think about to use the specification
>> “(?:IS_ERR(?:_(?:OR_NULL|VALUE))?|WARN)”
>> in this regular expr
> +# nested likely/unlikely calls
> + if ($line =~
> /\b(?:(?:un)?likely)\s*\(\s*!?\s*(IS_ERR(?:_OR_NULL|_VALUE)?|WARN)/) {
> + WARN("LIKELY_MISUSE",
…
>> \b(?:un)?likely\s*
>
> This pair of brackets is required to match "unlikely"
> and it's optional in order to
+# nested likely/unlikely calls
+ if ($line =~
/\b(?:(?:un)?likely)\s*\(\s*!?\s*(IS_ERR(?:_OR_NULL|_VALUE)?|WARN)/) {
+ WARN("LIKELY_MISUSE",
How do you think about to use the specification
“(?:IS_ERR(?:_(?:OR_NULL|VALUE))?|WARN)”
in this regular expression?
This resolves a type conversion from 'char *' to 'unsigned short'.
and static usage warning as hinted by Sparse.
Signed-off-by: Adam Zerella
---
arch/x86/xen/efi.c | 14 +++---
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/efi.c b/arch/x86/xen/efi.c
index 0d3
flight 140894 linux-4.14 real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/140894/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-pvshim 16 guest-localmigrate fail REGR. vs. 139910
Tests which are fail
flight 140904 libvirt real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/140904/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 14 saverestore-support-checkfail like 140598
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-raw 13 saveresto
Rather than using static int max_dma_bits, this
can be coverted to use as macro.
Signed-off-by: Souptick Joarder
---
drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c b/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c
index ae1df49..d1eced5 100
flight 140902 linux-linus real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/140902/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-examine 8 reboot fail REGR. vs. 133580
test-amd64-i386-xl-
flight 140905 qemu-mainline real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/140905/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-pvshim 18 guest-localmigrate/x10 fail REGR. vs. 140282
Tests which are f
On 2019-08-21 06:57, Andreas Kinzler wrote:
On 20.08.2019 22:38, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 20/08/2019 21:36, Andreas Kinzler wrote:
On 20.08.2019 20:12, Andrew Cooper wrote:
Xen version 4.10.2. dom0 kernel 4.13.16. The BIOS version is
unchanged
from 2700X (working) to 3700X (crashing).
So you'v
On 2019-09-02 11:42, Steven Haigh wrote:
On 2019-08-21 06:57, Andreas Kinzler wrote:
On 20.08.2019 22:38, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 20/08/2019 21:36, Andreas Kinzler wrote:
On 20.08.2019 20:12, Andrew Cooper wrote:
Xen version 4.10.2. dom0 kernel 4.13.16. The BIOS version is
unchanged
from 270
flight 140909 linux-4.19 real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/140909/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-armhf-pvops 6 kernel-build fail REGR. vs. 129313
test-amd64-amd64-xl-
flight 140920 linux-4.4 real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/140920/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 139698
build-amd64-xsm
17 matches
Mail list logo
