[Xen-devel] [xen-4.10-testing test] 138755: trouble: broken/fail/pass

2019-07-06 Thread osstest service owner
flight 138755 xen-4.10-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/138755/ Failures and problems with tests :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-arm64-arm64-xl-thunderx broken Tests which did

[Xen-devel] [libvirt bisection] complete build-i386-libvirt

2019-07-06 Thread osstest service owner
branch xen-unstable xenbranch xen-unstable job build-i386-libvirt testid libvirt-build Tree: libvirt git://libvirt.org/libvirt.git Tree: libvirt_gnulib https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/gnulib.git/ Tree: libvirt_keycodemapdb https://gitlab.com/keycodemap/keycodemapdb.git Tree: ovmf git://xenbits.xe

Re: [Xen-devel] [GSOC-2019] Problem with initializing crossbar on bb-x15 in dom0

2019-07-06 Thread Denis Obrezkov
Hi, On 7/5/19 11:47 PM, Denis Obrezkov wrote: > So, > > >> I am going to try to expose the whole crossbar to the dom0 by mapping it >> into dom0 and after that to unmap it and restrict the use of the control >> register via register_mmio_handler. Don't know whether this will work. >> > > I trie

Re: [Xen-devel] [GSOC-2019] Problem with initializing crossbar on bb-x15 in dom0

2019-07-06 Thread Julien Grall
Hi Denis, On 7/6/19 11:19 AM, Denis Obrezkov wrote: On 7/5/19 11:47 PM, Denis Obrezkov wrote: So, I am going to try to expose the whole crossbar to the dom0 by mapping it into dom0 and after that to unmap it and restrict the use of the control register via register_mmio_handler. Don't know w

Re: [Xen-devel] [GSOC-2019] Problem with initializing crossbar on bb-x15 in dom0

2019-07-06 Thread Denis Obrezkov
Hi, On 7/6/19 12:56 PM, Julien Grall wrote: > Hi Denis, > > On 7/6/19 11:19 AM, Denis Obrezkov wrote: >> On 7/5/19 11:47 PM, Denis Obrezkov wrote: >>> So, >>> >>> I am going to try to expose the whole crossbar to the dom0 by mapping it into dom0 and after that to unmap it and restr

[Xen-devel] [xen-4.12-testing test] 138759: regressions - FAIL

2019-07-06 Thread osstest service owner
flight 138759 xen-4.12-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/138759/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-xl-raw7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 137867 Tests which di

Re: [Xen-devel] Ethernet PCI passthrough problem

2019-07-06 Thread Frédéric Pierret
On 7/5/19 4:24 PM, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 05.07.2019 15:46, Frédéric Pierret wrote: >> I'm experiencing problem to perform PCI passthrough of Ethernet card >> with 4 ports (HP Ethernet 1Gb 4-port 331FLR Adapter) on an HP DL360 Gen8. >> >> I have two server like this one where the first is under C

Re: [Xen-devel] [GSOC-2019] Problem with initializing crossbar on bb-x15 in dom0

2019-07-06 Thread Julien Grall
On 06/07/2019 13:20, Denis Obrezkov wrote: > sorry for confusing you, I share a bit outdated log but only to show the > output of xen about device tree. We already overcome that error about > omap specific mapping (applied one of Iain's patches). I actually misread the first e-mail and didn't no

[Xen-devel] [xen-4.11-testing test] 138761: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED

2019-07-06 Thread osstest service owner
flight 138761 xen-4.11-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/138761/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-dmrestrict-amd64-dmrestrict 10 debian-hvm-install fail never pass test-amd64-i386-xl

Re: [Xen-devel] [GSOC-2019] Problem with initializing crossbar on bb-x15 in dom0

2019-07-06 Thread Denis Obrezkov
Hi, On 7/6/19 5:57 PM, Julien Grall wrote: > > > rc = unmap_mmio_regions(d, _gfn(pfn_start), > pfn_end + pfn_start + 1, > _mfn(pfn_start)); > > You are not computing correctly the number of pages. I think you want > "pfn_end - pfn

Re: [Xen-devel] [GSOC-2019] Problem with initializing crossbar on bb-x15 in dom0

2019-07-06 Thread Julien Grall
On 06/07/2019 17:31, Denis Obrezkov wrote: > Hi, Hi Denis, > > On 7/6/19 5:57 PM, Julien Grall wrote: >> > >> >> rc = unmap_mmio_regions(d, _gfn(pfn_start), >> pfn_end + pfn_start + 1, >> _mfn(pfn_start)); >> >> You are not com

Re: [Xen-devel] [GSOC-2019] Problem with initializing crossbar on bb-x15 in dom0

2019-07-06 Thread Denis Obrezkov
>> Ok, I changed it and was able to boot to the previous error. I think a >> logical next step would be to set up the uart somehow? > > Do you mean the UART used by Xen? Yes, to be able to switch between xen and dom0, to download a produced dt for dom0 for example. > >>> >>> But this feels weird

Re: [Xen-devel] [GSOC-2019] Problem with initializing crossbar on bb-x15 in dom0

2019-07-06 Thread Julien Grall
Hi Denis, On 7/6/19 5:50 PM, Denis Obrezkov wrote: Ok, I changed it and was able to boot to the previous error. I think a logical next step would be to set up the uart somehow? Do you mean the UART used by Xen? Yes, to be able to switch between xen and dom0, to download a produced dt for dom0

Re: [Xen-devel] [GSOC-2019] Problem with initializing crossbar on bb-x15 in dom0

2019-07-06 Thread Denis Obrezkov
Hi, On 7/6/19 7:37 PM, Julien Grall wrote: > > Yes it would be sensible to try to implement a crossbar driver in Xen > and test with the UART. Looking at the driver in Linux, this should not > be too difficult. I don't understand why xen doesn't react on triple Ctrl+a. It probably means that UAR

[Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/1] Dom0less guest device tree format

2019-07-06 Thread Will Abele
From: Will Abele Hi, I've been using dom0less Xen on the Hikey 960 with a 4.14 Linux Kernel. I had trouble getting the 4.14 Linux Kernel to boot as a dom0less domU because it was misinterpreting the device tree version. Linux 4.14 and earlier interpret device trees with a "/" in the root node as

[Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/1] xen/arm: Use "" instead of "/" for domU root node.

2019-07-06 Thread Will Abele
From: Will Abele Prior to linux a7e4cfb0a7ca4773e7d0dd1d9c018ab27a15360e (merged in 4.15), Linux checked to see if the device tree version was greater than 0x10 by checking for a root node "/". Xen creates a version 0x11 device tree, so the root node's unit name should be "". Signed-off-by: Will

[Xen-devel] [qemu-mainline test] 138762: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED

2019-07-06 Thread osstest service owner
flight 138762 qemu-mainline real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/138762/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 17 guest-stopfail like 138740 test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 14 sav

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/1] Dom0less guest device tree format

2019-07-06 Thread Julien Grall
On 06/07/2019 19:02, Will Abele wrote: > From: Will Abele > > Hi, Hi, > I've been using dom0less Xen on the Hikey 960 with a 4.14 Linux Kernel. I had > trouble getting the 4.14 Linux Kernel to boot as a dom0less domU because it > was > misinterpreting the device tree version. Linux 4.14 and

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/1] Dom0less guest device tree format

2019-07-06 Thread Julien Grall
On 06/07/2019 19:17, Julien Grall wrote: > > > On 06/07/2019 19:02, Will Abele wrote: >> From: Will Abele >> >> Hi, > > Hi, > >> I've been using dom0less Xen on the Hikey 960 with a 4.14 Linux >> Kernel. I had >> trouble getting the 4.14 Linux Kernel to boot as a dom0less domU >> because i

Re: [Xen-devel] [GSOC-2019] Problem with initializing crossbar on bb-x15 in dom0

2019-07-06 Thread Julien Grall
On 06/07/2019 18:55, Denis Obrezkov wrote: > Hi, > > On 7/6/19 7:37 PM, Julien Grall wrote: > >> >> Yes it would be sensible to try to implement a crossbar driver in Xen >> and test with the UART. Looking at the driver in Linux, this should not >> be too difficult. > I don't understand why xen

[Xen-devel] [libvirt test] 138765: regressions - FAIL

2019-07-06 Thread osstest service owner
flight 138765 libvirt real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/138765/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-armhf-armhf-libvirt16 guest-start/debian.repeat fail REGR. vs. 138618 Tests which did not suc

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/1] Dom0less guest device tree format

2019-07-06 Thread Will Abele
The 07/06/2019 18:19, Julien Grall wrote: > > > On 06/07/2019 19:17, Julien Grall wrote: > > > > > > On 06/07/2019 19:02, Will Abele wrote: > >> From: Will Abele > >> > >> Hi, > > > > Hi, > > > >> I've been using dom0less Xen on the Hikey 960 with a 4.14 Linux > >> Kernel. I had > >> troubl

[Xen-devel] [linux-next test] 138764: regressions - FAIL

2019-07-06 Thread osstest service owner
flight 138764 linux-next real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/138764/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-libvirt 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 138735 test-amd64-amd64-xl-

[Xen-devel] [linux-4.19 test] 138768: regressions - FAIL

2019-07-06 Thread osstest service owner
flight 138768 linux-4.19 real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/138768/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-amd 12 guest-start/redhat.repeat fail REGR. vs. 129313 build-armhf-