On 15/02/2019 18:20, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 03:58:49AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 15.02.19 at 05:23, wrote:
>>> The MCE/EDAC support code appears to be in rather poor shape.
>>>
>>> The AMD code mentions Family 10h, which might have been available 10
>>> years ag
On Fri, 15 Feb 2019, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 09:03:24PM +, Lars Kurth wrote:
> >
> >
> > > On 14 Feb 2019, at 18:32, Stefano Stabellini
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 14 Feb 2019, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > On 13.02.19 at 20:11, wrote:
> > >>> On Wed, 13 Feb 2019, Wei
flight 133238 libvirt real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/133238/
Failures and problems with tests :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-arm64-pvopsbroken
build-arm64-xsm
flight 133243 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/133243/
Perfect :-)
All tests in this flight passed as required
version targeted for testing:
ovmf fb0b35e05f772bd415fe264267bbbcde2e0accda
baseline version:
ovmf 1a35dd723bbf9333a11f6
flight 133240 linux-4.19 real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/133240/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-arm64 broken
build-arm64-pvops
flight 133239 linux-3.18 real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/133239/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-arm64-pvopsbroken
build-arm64
flight 133242 linux-4.9 real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/133242/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-arm64-xsm broken
build-arm64
101 - 107 of 107 matches
Mail list logo