[Xen-devel] [qemu-mainline test] 132081: regressions - FAIL

flight 132081 qemu-mainline real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/132081/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-i386-xsm6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 131842 build-i386

[Xen-devel] [ovmf test] 132077: regressions - FAIL

flight 132077 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/132077/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 10 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 129475 test-amd64-i386-xl-qemu

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable-coverity test] 132169: all pass - PUSHED

flight 132169 xen-unstable-coverity real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/132169/ Perfect :-) All tests in this flight passed as required version targeted for testing: xen 1912f1220cf87aee28349469893f101980714a05 baseline version: xen 8432

[Xen-devel] [linux-3.18 test] 132066: regressions - FAIL

flight 132066 linux-3.18 real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/132066/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-examine 8 reboot fail REGR. vs. 128858 test-amd64-i386-xl-s

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 15/15] argo: validate hypercall arg structures via compat machinery

On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 3:25 AM Jan Beulich wrote: > > >>> On 17.01.19 at 08:22, wrote: > > Some details of the problem: > > > > Without the macro overrides in place (ie. using the existing > > definitions) the build fails on CHECK_argo_send_addr because this > > struct is defined with types tha

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen-unstable PVHdom0: Assertion 'IS_ALIGNED(dfn_x(dfn), (1ul << page_order))' failed at iommu.c:324

On 18/01/2019 18:56, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 03:17:57PM +0100, Sander Eikelenboom wrote: >> On 18/01/2019 13:50, Roger Pau Monné wrote: >>> On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 01:03:04PM +0100, Sander Eikelenboom wrote: Hi Roger, I gave PVH dom0 a spin, see how far I wou

[Xen-devel] [qemu-mainline bisection] complete test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-dmrestrict-amd64-dmrestrict

branch xen-unstable xenbranch xen-unstable job test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-dmrestrict-amd64-dmrestrict testid debian-hvm-install Tree: linux git://xenbits.xen.org/linux-pvops.git Tree: linuxfirmware git://xenbits.xen.org/osstest/linux-firmware.git Tree: qemu git://xenbits.xen.org/qemu-xen-traditiona

[Xen-devel] [linux-linus test] 132086: regressions - FAIL

flight 132086 linux-linus real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/132086/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-pair10 xen-boot/src_hostfail REGR. vs. 125898 test-amd64-amd64-pa

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 10/14] argo: implement the notify op

On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 4:06 AM Roger Pau Monné wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 03:54:14PM -0800, Christopher Clark wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 1:44 AM Roger Pau Monné > > wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 01:44:32PM -0800, Christopher Clark wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jan 17, 2019

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 132093: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED

flight 132093 xen-unstable real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/132093/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 17 guest-stopfail like 131960 test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64

Re: [Xen-devel] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/4] QEMU changes to do PVH boot

Patchew URL: https://patchew.org/QEMU/1547554687-12687-1-git-send-email-liam.merw...@oracle.com/ Hi, This series failed the docker-mingw@fedora build test. Please find the testing commands and their output below. If you have Docker installed, you can probably reproduce it locally. === TEST S

[Xen-devel] [RFC] virtio_ring: check dma_mem for xen_domain

on i.MX8QM, M4_1 is communicating with DomU using rpmsg with a fixed address as the dma mem buffer which is predefined. Without this patch, the flow is: vring_map_one_sg -> vring_use_dma_api -> dma_map_page -> __swiotlb_map_page

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v6 1/4] xen: introduce SYMBOL

On Friday, January 18, 2019 6:05 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Fri, 18 Jan 2019, Jan Beulich wrote: > > >>> On 18.01.19 at 02:24, wrote: > > > On Thu, 17 Jan 2019, Jan Beulich wrote: > > >> >>> On 17.01.19 at 01:37, wrote: > > >> > On Wed, 16 Jan 2019, Jan Beulich wrote: > > >> >> In any eve

Re: [Xen-devel] Unable to boot Linux with master EDK2

Hi Julien Grall I have committed the fix patch. https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/commit/eb76b76218d5bac867414e2ff6dd09c6e7c700dd Please trying the latest EDK2 master. Thanks, Dandan > -Original Message- > From: Julien Grall [mailto:julien.gr...@arm.com] > Sent: Saturday, January 19,

[Xen-devel] [qemu-mainline test] 132161: regressions - FAIL

flight 132161 qemu-mainline real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/132161/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-i386-xsm6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 131842 build-i386

[Xen-devel] [linux-linus bisection] complete test-amd64-amd64-rumprun-amd64

branch xen-unstable xenbranch xen-unstable job test-amd64-amd64-rumprun-amd64 testid xen-boot Tree: linux git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git Tree: linuxfirmware git://xenbits.xen.org/osstest/linux-firmware.git Tree: qemu git://xenbits.xen.org/qemu-xen-traditional.

[Xen-devel] [ovmf test] 132170: regressions - FAIL

flight 132170 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/132170/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 10 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 129475 test-amd64-i386-xl-qemu