flight 131660 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/131660/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking):
test-armhf-armhf-xl 5 host-ping-check-native fail pass in 131648
Tests which did not succeed, but
flight 131668 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/131668/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i3866 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 129475
build-i386-xsm
flight 131663 linux-4.14 real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/131663/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-amd64-i386-xl-pvshim12 guest-start fail never pass
test-amd64-i386-libvirt 13 migrat
flight 131661 linux-next real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/131661/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 131534
test-amd64-amd64-xl-
Hello,
On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 06:55:38PM +, Andy Smith wrote:
> Is it worth me moving this guest to a test host without pcid=0 to
> see if it crashes it, meanwhile keeping production hosts with
> pcid=0? And then putting pcid=0 on the test host to see if it
> survives longer?
I did move the
flight 131671 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/131671/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i3866 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 129475
build-i386-xsm
flight 131666 linux-3.18 real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/131666/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-armhf-armhf-xl-arndale broken in 131655
test-amd64-i386-examine 8
flight 131672 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/131672/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i3866 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 129475
build-i386-xsm
flight 131667 linux-4.19 real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/131667/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-shadow7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 129313
test-amd64-amd64-i38
flight 131674 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/131674/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i3866 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 129475
build-i386-xsm
flight 131676 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/131676/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i3866 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 129475
build-i386-xsm
flight 131677 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/131677/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i3866 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 129475
build-i386-xsm
> From: Andrew Cooper [mailto:andrew.coop...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Friday, December 28, 2018 8:40 PM
>
> c/s fd32dcfe4c "x86/vmx: Don't leak EFER.NXE into guest context" had an
> unintended consequence on Harpertown cores which, as it turns out, don't
> load MSR_EFER fully from the MSR Load List - o
13 matches
Mail list logo
