Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/4] iommu: generalize iommu_inclusive_mapping

2018-07-31 Thread Paul Durrant
> -Original Message- > From: Xen-devel [mailto:xen-devel-boun...@lists.xenproject.org] On Behalf > Of Roger Pau Monne > Sent: 27 July 2018 16:32 > To: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org > Cc: Kevin Tian ; Stefano Stabellini > ; Wei Liu ; George Dunlap > ; Andrew Cooper > ; Ian Jackson ; Tim > (

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/4] iommu: remove unneeded return from iommu_hwdom_init

2018-07-31 Thread Paul Durrant
> -Original Message- > From: Xen-devel [mailto:xen-devel-boun...@lists.xenproject.org] On Behalf > Of Roger Pau Monne > Sent: 27 July 2018 16:32 > To: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org > Cc: Jan Beulich ; Roger Pau Monne > > Subject: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/4] iommu: remove unneeded return from

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/4] x86/iommu: reorder conditions used in the inclusive iommu mappings

2018-07-31 Thread Paul Durrant
> -Original Message- > From: Xen-devel [mailto:xen-devel-boun...@lists.xenproject.org] On Behalf > Of Roger Pau Monne > Sent: 27 July 2018 16:32 > To: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org > Cc: Jan Beulich ; Roger Pau Monne > > Subject: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/4] x86/iommu: reorder conditions used

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 4/4] x86/iommu: add PVH support to the inclusive options

2018-07-31 Thread Paul Durrant
> -Original Message- > From: Xen-devel [mailto:xen-devel-boun...@lists.xenproject.org] On Behalf > Of Roger Pau Monne > Sent: 27 July 2018 16:32 > To: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org > Cc: Stefano Stabellini ; Wei Liu > ; George Dunlap ; > Andrew Cooper ; Ian Jackson > ; Tim (Xen.org) ; Juli

Re: [Xen-devel] [goto-label] memory: fix label syntax

2018-07-31 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 31.07.18 at 09:18, wrote: > To be able to compile Xen with gotocc, the label statement has to be > followed by a semicolon. Assuming that gotocc aims to be gcc compatible, this looks like a shortcoming there. As the workaround is simple enough, I'm fine with the change, but the description

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] tools/gdbsx: fix 'g' packet response for 64bit guests

2018-07-31 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 31.07.18 at 04:30, wrote: Marek, looks like all of the patches you've sent early this morning local time here came through twice on xen-devel: Would you please avoid having xen-devel on both the To and the Cc lists (just with different domains)? Thanks, Jan ___

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v8 02/11] arm: make it possible to disable HAS_GICV3

2018-07-31 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 30.07.18 at 19:48, wrote: > Today it is a silent option. This patch adds a one line description and > makes it optional. > > Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini > Acked-by: Julien Grall > CC: george.dun...@eu.citrix.com > CC: ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com > CC: jbeul...@suse.com > CC: andre

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] tools/gdbsx: fix 'g' packet response for 64bit guests

2018-07-31 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 31/07/2018 09:01, Jan Beulich wrote: On 31.07.18 at 04:30, wrote: > Marek, > > looks like all of the patches you've sent early this morning local time > here came through twice on xen-devel: Would you please avoid > having xen-devel on both the To and the Cc lists (just with different > do

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/4] iommu: generalize iommu_inclusive_mapping

2018-07-31 Thread Roger Pau Monné
On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 08:18:36AM +0100, Paul Durrant wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Xen-devel [mailto:xen-devel-boun...@lists.xenproject.org] On Behalf > > Of Roger Pau Monne > > Sent: 27 July 2018 16:32 > > To: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org > > Cc: Kevin Tian ; Stefano Stabelli

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/4] x86/iommu: reorder conditions used in the inclusive iommu mappings

2018-07-31 Thread Roger Pau Monné
On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 08:29:20AM +0100, Paul Durrant wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Xen-devel [mailto:xen-devel-boun...@lists.xenproject.org] On Behalf > > @@ -179,6 +169,13 @@ void __hwdom_init arch_iommu_hwdom_init(struct > > domain *d) > > */ > > if ( iommu_

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/4] iommu: generalize iommu_inclusive_mapping

2018-07-31 Thread Paul Durrant
> -Original Message- > From: Roger Pau Monne > Sent: 31 July 2018 09:16 > To: Paul Durrant > Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Kevin Tian ; > Stefano Stabellini ; Wei Liu ; > George Dunlap ; Andrew Cooper > ; Ian Jackson ; Tim > (Xen.org) ; Julien Grall ; Jan Beulich > > Subject: Re: [X

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 4/4] x86/iommu: add PVH support to the inclusive options

2018-07-31 Thread Roger Pau Monné
On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 08:36:02AM +0100, Paul Durrant wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Xen-devel [mailto:xen-devel-boun...@lists.xenproject.org] On Behalf > > Of Roger Pau Monne > > Sent: 27 July 2018 16:32 > > To: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org > > Cc: Stefano Stabellini ; Wei Liu

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/4] iommu: generalize iommu_inclusive_mapping

2018-07-31 Thread Roger Pau Monné
On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 09:27:03AM +0100, Paul Durrant wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Roger Pau Monne > > Sent: 31 July 2018 09:16 > > To: Paul Durrant > > Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Kevin Tian ; > > Stefano Stabellini ; Wei Liu ; > > George Dunlap ; Andrew Cooper > > ; I

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] tools/gdbsx: fix 'g' packet response for 64bit guests

2018-07-31 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 31.07.18 at 10:09, wrote: > On 31/07/2018 09:01, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 31.07.18 at 04:30, wrote: >> Marek, >> >> looks like all of the patches you've sent early this morning local time >> here came through twice on xen-devel: Would you please avoid >> having xen-devel on both the To

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/4] iommu: generalize iommu_inclusive_mapping

2018-07-31 Thread Paul Durrant
> -Original Message- > From: Roger Pau Monne > Sent: 31 July 2018 09:34 > To: Paul Durrant > Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Kevin Tian ; > Stefano Stabellini ; Wei Liu ; > George Dunlap ; Andrew Cooper > ; Ian Jackson ; Tim > (Xen.org) ; Julien Grall ; Jan Beulich > > Subject: Re: [X

Re: [Xen-devel] [goto-label] memory: fix label syntax

2018-07-31 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 31.07.18 at 10:32, wrote: > Sorry for putting you in the To field, I'll use Cc in the future. > > I agree that the commit message is a little short, and I will iterate on > that. Furthermore, I agree that gcc compatibility would allow to parse > this statement. However, the given sequence

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/4] iommu: generalize iommu_inclusive_mapping

2018-07-31 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 31.07.18 at 10:27, wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Roger Pau Monne >> Sent: 31 July 2018 09:16 >> To: Paul Durrant >> Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Kevin Tian ; >> Stefano Stabellini ; Wei Liu ; >> George Dunlap ; Andrew Cooper >> ; Ian Jackson ; Tim >> (Xen.org) ; Jul

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/4] iommu: generalize iommu_inclusive_mapping

2018-07-31 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 31.07.18 at 10:37, wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Roger Pau Monne >> Sent: 31 July 2018 09:34 >> To: Paul Durrant >> Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Kevin Tian ; >> Stefano Stabellini ; Wei Liu ; >> George Dunlap ; Andrew Cooper >> ; Ian Jackson ; Tim >> (Xen.org) ; Jul

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] tools/gdbsx: fix 'g' packet response for 64bit guests

2018-07-31 Thread Wei Liu
On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 04:30:42AM +0200, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > gdb 8.0 fixed bounds checking for 'g' packet (commit > 9dc193c3be85aafa60ceff57d3b0430af607b4ce "Check for truncated > registers in process_g_packet"). This revealed that gdbsx did > not properly formatted 'g' packet - se

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 1/2] docs: add xenstore-read and xenstore-write man pages

2018-07-31 Thread Wei Liu
On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 04:56:53AM +0200, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > Signed-off-by: Marek Marczykowski-Górecki Acked-by: Wei Liu Thanks for doing this! ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/ma

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 2/2] xenstore-client: Add option for raw in-/output

2018-07-31 Thread Wei Liu
On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 04:56:54AM +0200, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > From: Simon Gaiser > > Parsing/generating the escape sequences used by xenstore-client is non > trivial. So make scripting (for use in stubdom) easier by adding a raw > option. > > [added man page entries, facor out ex

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/4] iommu: generalize iommu_inclusive_mapping

2018-07-31 Thread Roger Pau Monné
On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 02:49:19AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 31.07.18 at 10:37, wrote: > >> -Original Message- > >> From: Roger Pau Monne > >> Sent: 31 July 2018 09:34 > >> To: Paul Durrant > >> Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Kevin Tian ; > >> Stefano Stabellini ; Wei Liu ;

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] tools/gdbsx: fix 'g' packet response for 64bit guests

2018-07-31 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 31/07/18 10:00, Wei Liu wrote: > On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 04:30:42AM +0200, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: >> gdb 8.0 fixed bounds checking for 'g' packet (commit >> 9dc193c3be85aafa60ceff57d3b0430af607b4ce "Check for truncated >> registers in process_g_packet"). This revealed that gdbsx did >

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] xenconsole: add option to avoid escape sequences in log

2018-07-31 Thread Wei Liu
On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 05:15:32AM +0200, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > Add --replace-escape option to xenconsoled, which replaces ESC with > '.' in console output written to log file. This makes it slightly safer > to do tail -f on a console output of untrusted guest. > The pty output is una

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] tools/gdbsx: fix 'g' packet response for 64bit guests

2018-07-31 Thread Wei Liu
On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 10:08:06AM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 31/07/18 10:00, Wei Liu wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 04:30:42AM +0200, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > >> gdb 8.0 fixed bounds checking for 'g' packet (commit > >> 9dc193c3be85aafa60ceff57d3b0430af607b4ce "Check for trunc

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/4] iommu: generalize iommu_inclusive_mapping

2018-07-31 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 31.07.18 at 11:05, wrote: > On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 02:49:19AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: >> >>> On 31.07.18 at 10:37, wrote: >> >> -Original Message- >> >> From: Roger Pau Monne >> >> Sent: 31 July 2018 09:34 >> >> To: Paul Durrant >> >> Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Kevin

Re: [Xen-devel] [goto-label v2] memory: fix label syntax

2018-07-31 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 31.07.18 at 10:56, wrote: > When compiling this file with gcc, the compiler happily accepts the > sequence of a label followed by an attribute. However, this sequence does > not follow the gcc documentation. Hence, other compilers might stumble > upon this statement. > > To be able to comp

Re: [Xen-devel] [goto-label v2] memory: fix label syntax

2018-07-31 Thread Wei Liu
On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 03:18:51AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 31.07.18 at 10:56, wrote: > > When compiling this file with gcc, the compiler happily accepts the > > sequence of a label followed by an attribute. However, this sequence does > > not follow the gcc documentation. Hence, other c

[Xen-devel] [goto-label v2] memory: fix label syntax

2018-07-31 Thread Norbert Manthey
When compiling this file with gcc, the compiler happily accepts the sequence of a label followed by an attribute. However, this sequence does not follow the gcc documentation. Hence, other compilers might stumble upon this statement. To be able to compile Xen with goto-cc (the compiler of the CPRO

[Xen-devel] [goto-label] memory: fix label syntax

2018-07-31 Thread Norbert Manthey
To be able to compile Xen with gotocc, the label statement has to be followed by a semicolon. Reported-by: Elizabeth Polgreen Signed-off-by: Norbert Manthey --- xen/common/memory.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/xen/common/memory.c b/xen/common/memory.c inde

Re: [Xen-devel] [goto-label v2] memory: fix label syntax

2018-07-31 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 31.07.18 at 11:24, wrote: > On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 03:18:51AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: >> >>> On 31.07.18 at 10:56, wrote: >> > When compiling this file with gcc, the compiler happily accepts the >> > sequence of a label followed by an attribute. However, this sequence does >> > not foll

Re: [Xen-devel] [goto-label] memory: fix label syntax

2018-07-31 Thread Norbert Manthey
Sorry for putting you in the To field, I'll use Cc in the future. I agree that the commit message is a little short, and I will iterate on that. Furthermore, I agree that gcc compatibility would allow to parse this statement. However, the given sequence is not unique, and the gcc documentation sta

Re: [Xen-devel] [goto-label v2] memory: fix label syntax

2018-07-31 Thread Wei Liu
On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 03:27:03AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 31.07.18 at 11:24, wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 03:18:51AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > >> >>> On 31.07.18 at 10:56, wrote: > >> > When compiling this file with gcc, the compiler happily accepts the > >> > sequence of a la

[Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/1] cameraif: Add ABI for para-virtualized

2018-07-31 Thread Oleksandr Andrushchenko
From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko Hello! At the moment Xen [1] already supports some virtual multimedia features [2] such as virtual display, sound. It supports keyboards, pointers and multi-touch devices all allowing Xen to be used in automotive appliances, In-Vehicle Infotainment (IVI) systems and

[Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/1] cameraif: add ABI for para-virtual camera

2018-07-31 Thread Oleksandr Andrushchenko
From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko This is the ABI for the two halves of a para-virtualized camera driver which extends Xen's reach multimedia capabilities even farther enabling it for video conferencing, In-Vehicle Infotainment, high definition maps etc. The initial goal is to support most needed fu

[Xen-devel] [qemu-mainline test] 125675: trouble: broken/fail/pass

2018-07-31 Thread osstest service owner
flight 125675 qemu-mainline real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/125675/ Failures and problems with tests :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-armhf-armhf-libvirt broken test-armhf-armhf-li

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/4] iommu: generalize iommu_inclusive_mapping

2018-07-31 Thread Roger Pau Monné
On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 03:14:47AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 31.07.18 at 11:05, wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 02:49:19AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > >> >>> On 31.07.18 at 10:37, wrote: > >> >> -Original Message- > >> >> From: Roger Pau Monne > >> >> Sent: 31 July 2018 09:34

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/4] iommu: generalize iommu_inclusive_mapping

2018-07-31 Thread Paul Durrant
> -Original Message- > From: Roger Pau Monne > Sent: 31 July 2018 10:35 > To: Jan Beulich > Cc: Julien Grall ; Andrew Cooper > ; George Dunlap > ; Ian Jackson ; Paul > Durrant ; Wei Liu ; Kevin > Tian ; Stefano Stabellini ; > xen-devel ; Tim (Xen.org) > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/4

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/4] iommu: generalize iommu_inclusive_mapping

2018-07-31 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 31.07.18 at 11:34, wrote: > On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 03:14:47AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: >> >>> On 31.07.18 at 11:05, wrote: >> > On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 02:49:19AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: >> >> >>> On 31.07.18 at 10:37, wrote: >> >> >> -Original Message- >> >> >> From: Roger P

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/4] iommu: generalize iommu_inclusive_mapping

2018-07-31 Thread Paul Durrant
> -Original Message- > From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com] > Sent: 31 July 2018 10:42 > To: Roger Pau Monne > Cc: Julien Grall ; Andrew Cooper > ; George Dunlap > ; Ian Jackson ; Paul > Durrant ; Wei Liu ; Kevin > Tian ; Stefano Stabellini ; > xen-devel ; Tim (Xen.org) > Subject:

[Xen-devel] Xen Security Advisory 274 v2 (CVE-2018-14678) - Linux: Uninitialized state in x86 PV failsafe callback path

2018-07-31 Thread Xen . org security team
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Xen Security Advisory CVE-2018-14678 / XSA-274 version 2 Linux: Uninitialized state in x86 PV failsafe callback path UPDATES IN VERSION 2 CVE assigned. Fix the title to refer to

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH qemu-xen-traditional] xen/pt: allow QEMU to request MSI unmasking at bind time

2018-07-31 Thread Woodhouse, David
Ian, any objections? Thanks.On Thu, 2018-06-21 at 08:37 +, Paraschiv, Andra-Irina wrote: > + Cc: Ian Jackson for review. > > Thanks, Roger, for review and feedback. > > Andra > > From: Roger Pau Monné > Sent: Monday, June 18, 2018 2:43 PM > To: Para

[Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/xstate: correct logging in handle_xsetbv()

2018-07-31 Thread Jan Beulich
Correct a disagreement between text and logged value. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich --- NB: I've already corrected this in the backports. --- a/xen/arch/x86/xstate.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/xstate.c @@ -715,7 +715,7 @@ int handle_xsetbv(u32 index, u64 new_bv) { gprintk(XENLOG_ERR,

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/xstate: correct logging in handle_xsetbv()

2018-07-31 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 31/07/18 11:37, Jan Beulich wrote: > Correct a disagreement between text and logged value. > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich Acked-by: Andrew Cooper ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinf

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/3] x86/spec-ctrl: Add defines and variables for AMD SSBD support

2018-07-31 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 20.07.18 at 16:57, wrote: > In preparation for adding switchable SSBD, add some defines and > variables. > > Signed-off-by: Brian Woods Whether these additions fit the purpose can only be told when seeing their use. Please fold this into the patch using these. Jan ___

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/3] x86/spec-ctrl: add AMD SSBD LS_CFG in init print

2018-07-31 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 20.07.18 at 16:57, wrote: > Edit the initialization code for AMD's SSBD via the LS_CFG MSR and > enable it to pass the status to the initial spec-ctrl print_details at > boot. > > Signed-off-by: Brian Woods > --- > xen/arch/x86/cpu/amd.c| 13 ++--- > xen/arch/x86/spec

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v8 02/11] arm: make it possible to disable HAS_GICV3

2018-07-31 Thread Julien Grall
Hi Jan, On 31/07/18 09:04, Jan Beulich wrote: On 30.07.18 at 19:48, wrote: Today it is a silent option. This patch adds a one line description and makes it optional. Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini Acked-by: Julien Grall CC: george.dun...@eu.citrix.com CC: ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com CC: jb

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v8 08/11] arm: add ALL_PLAT, QEMU, Rcar3 and MPSoC configs

2018-07-31 Thread Julien Grall
Hi Stefano, On 30/07/18 18:48, Stefano Stabellini wrote: Add a "Platform Support" choice with four kconfig options: QEMU, RCAR3, MPSOC and ALL_PLAT. They enable the required options for their hardware platform. ALL_PLAT enables all available platforms and it's the default. It doesn't automatical

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable-smoke test] 125694: tolerable all pass - PUSHED

2018-07-31 Thread osstest service owner
flight 125694 xen-unstable-smoke real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/125694/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-amd64-amd64-libvirt 13 migrate-support-checkfail never pass test-arm64-arm64-xl-xsm 1

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable baseline-only test] 75028: regressions - FAIL

2018-07-31 Thread Platform Team regression test user
This run is configured for baseline tests only. flight 75028 xen-unstable real [real] http://osstest.xensource.com/osstest/logs/75028/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-xtf-amd64-amd64-1 63 xtf/test-hvm64-xsa-204

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/3] x86/spec-ctrl: Add support for modifying SSBD AMD VIA LS_CFG MSR

2018-07-31 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 20.07.18 at 16:57, wrote: > --- a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/amd.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/amd.c > @@ -607,16 +607,10 @@ static void init_amd(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) > case 0x17: bit = 10; break; > } > > - if (bit >= 0) > - ssbd_amd_ls_cfg

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v8 00/11] arm: more kconfig configurability and small default configs

2018-07-31 Thread Julien Grall
On 30/07/18 18:48, Stefano Stabellini wrote: Hi all, Hi Stefano, This patch series is the first step toward building a small certifiable Xen hypervisor for ARM boards. The series makes a few changes to allow disabling more kconfig options: most of them already exist but cannot be disabled

[Xen-devel] [linux-next test] 125672: regressions - FAIL

2018-07-31 Thread osstest service owner
flight 125672 linux-next real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/125672/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 125585 test-amd64-i386-qemu

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3] x86/altp2m: Add a subop for obtaining the mem access of a page

2018-07-31 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 25.07.18 at 13:16, wrote: > --- a/xen/include/public/hvm/hvm_op.h > +++ b/xen/include/public/hvm/hvm_op.h > @@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ struct xen_hvm_altp2m_view { > typedef struct xen_hvm_altp2m_view xen_hvm_altp2m_view_t; > DEFINE_XEN_GUEST_HANDLE(xen_hvm_altp2m_view_t); > > -struct xen_hvm_

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 3/3] x86/altp2m: Add a hvmop for querying the suppress #VE bit

2018-07-31 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 25.07.18 at 13:18, wrote: > --- a/xen/include/public/hvm/hvm_op.h > +++ b/xen/include/public/hvm/hvm_op.h > @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ struct xen_hvm_param { > typedef struct xen_hvm_param xen_hvm_param_t; > DEFINE_XEN_GUEST_HANDLE(xen_hvm_param_t); > > -struct xen_hvm_altp2m_set_suppress_ve { >

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/altp2m: Allow setting the #VE info page for an arbitrary VCPU

2018-07-31 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 25.07.18 at 13:49, wrote: > --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c > @@ -4467,6 +4467,30 @@ static int hvmop_get_param( > return rc; > } > > +/* > + * Find the struct vcpu given a dom_id and vcpu_id. > + * Return NULL if not found. > + */ > +static struct vcpu *

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v14 01/11] x86/cpu: Introduce vmce_save_vcpu_ctxt_one() func

2018-07-31 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 25.07.18 at 14:14, wrote: > --- a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/mcheck/vmce.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/mcheck/vmce.c > @@ -349,6 +349,18 @@ int vmce_wrmsr(uint32_t msr, uint64_t val) > return ret; > } > > +static int vmce_save_vcpu_ctxt_one(struct vcpu *v, hvm_domain_context_t *h) Afaict v can

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v14 03/11] x86/hvm: Introduce hvm_save_cpu_ctxt_one func

2018-07-31 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 25.07.18 at 14:14, wrote: > This is used to save data from a single instance. > > Signed-off-by: Alexandru Isaila > > --- > Changes since V12: > - Changed memset to {} init. > --- > xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c | 214 > + > 1 file changed

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v14 04/11] x86/hvm: Introduce hvm_save_cpu_xsave_states_one

2018-07-31 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 25.07.18 at 14:14, wrote: > --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c > @@ -1188,33 +1188,45 @@ HVM_REGISTER_SAVE_RESTORE(CPU, hvm_save_cpu_ctxt, > hvm_load_cpu_ctxt, > save_area) + \ >xstate_

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v14 01/11] x86/cpu: Introduce vmce_save_vcpu_ctxt_one() func

2018-07-31 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 31.07.18 at 13:56, wrote: On 25.07.18 at 14:14, wrote: >> --- a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/mcheck/vmce.c >> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/mcheck/vmce.c >> @@ -349,6 +349,18 @@ int vmce_wrmsr(uint32_t msr, uint64_t val) >> return ret; >> } >> >> +static int vmce_save_vcpu_ctxt_one(struct vcpu *

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v14 05/11] x86/hvm: Introduce hvm_save_cpu_msrs_one func

2018-07-31 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 25.07.18 at 14:14, wrote: > --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c > @@ -1366,69 +1366,80 @@ static const uint32_t msrs_to_send[] = { > }; > static unsigned int __read_mostly msr_count_max = ARRAY_SIZE(msrs_to_send); > > -static int hvm_save_cpu_msrs(struct domain *

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v14 06/11] x86/hvm: Introduce hvm_save_mtrr_msr_one func

2018-07-31 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 25.07.18 at 14:14, wrote: > This is used to save data from a single instance. > > Signed-off-by: Alexandru Isaila > > --- > Changes since v11: > - hvm_save_mtrr_msr() now returns err from hvm_save_mtrr_msr_one(). > > Note: This patch is based on Roger Pau Monne's series[1] > --- >

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v14 07/11] x86/hvm: Introduce viridian_save_vcpu_ctxt_one() func

2018-07-31 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 25.07.18 at 14:14, wrote: > --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/viridian.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/viridian.c > @@ -1026,24 +1026,32 @@ static int viridian_load_domain_ctxt(struct domain > *d, hvm_domain_context_t *h) > HVM_REGISTER_SAVE_RESTORE(VIRIDIAN_DOMAIN, viridian_save_domain_ctxt, >

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v14 08/11] x86/hvm: Add handler for save_one funcs

2018-07-31 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 25.07.18 at 14:14, wrote: > --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/save.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/save.c > @@ -85,16 +85,18 @@ int arch_hvm_load(struct domain *d, struct > hvm_save_header *hdr) > /* List of handlers for various HVM save and restore types */ > static struct { > hvm_save_handler sav

[Xen-devel] [xen-4.10-testing test] 125677: regressions - FAIL

2018-07-31 Thread osstest service owner
flight 125677 xen-4.10-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/125677/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-xl-shadow 20 guest-start/debian.repeat fail REGR. vs. 124988 Tests which di

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v14 08/11] x86/hvm: Add handler for save_one funcs

2018-07-31 Thread Isaila Alexandru
On Ma, 2018-07-31 at 06:34 -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 25.07.18 at 14:14, wrote: > > --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/save.c > > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/save.c > > @@ -85,16 +85,18 @@ int arch_hvm_load(struct domain *d, struct > > hvm_save_header *hdr) > >  /* List of handlers f

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v14 09/11] x86/domctl: Don't pause the whole domain if only getting vcpu state

2018-07-31 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 25.07.18 at 14:14, wrote: > This patch is focused on moving the for loop to the caller so > now we can save info for a single vcpu instance with the save_one > handlers. > > Signed-off-by: Alexandru Isaila First of all I'd appreciate if this patch was last in the series, after all infras

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v14 10/11] x86/hvm: Remove redundant save functions

2018-07-31 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 25.07.18 at 14:14, wrote: > --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hpet.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hpet.c > @@ -516,8 +516,9 @@ static const struct hvm_mmio_ops hpet_mmio_ops = { > }; > > > -static int hpet_save(struct domain *d, hvm_domain_context_t *h) > +static int hpet_save(struct vcpu *vcpu, hvm_

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v14 10/11] x86/hvm: Remove redundant save functions

2018-07-31 Thread Isaila Alexandru
On Ma, 2018-07-31 at 07:24 -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 25.07.18 at 14:14, wrote: > > --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hpet.c > > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hpet.c > > @@ -516,8 +516,9 @@ static const struct hvm_mmio_ops hpet_mmio_ops > > = { > >  }; > >   > >   > > -static int hpet

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v14 08/11] x86/hvm: Add handler for save_one funcs

2018-07-31 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 31.07.18 at 14:55, wrote: > On Ma, 2018-07-31 at 06:34 -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: >> > > > On 25.07.18 at 14:14, wrote: >> > --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vlapic.c >> > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vlapic.c >> > @@ -1576,9 +1576,9 @@ static int lapic_load_regs(struct domain *d, >> > hvm_domain_context_t

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v14 08/11] x86/hvm: Add handler for save_one funcs

2018-07-31 Thread Isaila Alexandru
On Ma, 2018-07-31 at 07:32 -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 31.07.18 at 14:55, wrote: > > On Ma, 2018-07-31 at 06:34 -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 25.07.18 at 14:14, wrote: > > > > --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vlapic.c > > > >

[Xen-devel] [PATCH][next] xen/gntdev: don't dereference a null gntdev_dmabuf on allocation failure

2018-07-31 Thread Colin King
From: Colin Ian King Currently when the allocation of gntdev_dmabuf fails, the error exit path will call dmabuf_imp_free_storage and causes a null pointer dereference on gntdev_dmabuf. Fix this by adding an error exit path that won't free gntdev_dmabuf. Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1472124 ("D

[Xen-devel] [xen-4.8-testing test] 125679: regressions - FAIL

2018-07-31 Thread osstest service owner
flight 125679 xen-4.8-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/125679/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-credit2 18 guest-localmigrate/x10 fail REGR. vs. 125624 Tests which did

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v14 08/11] x86/hvm: Add handler for save_one funcs

2018-07-31 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 31.07.18 at 15:45, wrote: > On Ma, 2018-07-31 at 07:32 -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: >> > > > On 31.07.18 at 14:55, wrote: >> > On Ma, 2018-07-31 at 06:34 -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: >> > > > > > On 25.07.18 at 14:14, wrote: >> > > > @@ -114,12 +117,13 @@ void hvm_register_savevm(uint16_t >> >

[Xen-devel] [linux-linus test] 125676: regressions - FAIL

2018-07-31 Thread osstest service owner
flight 125676 linux-linus real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/125676/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-examine 4 memdisk-try-append fail REGR. vs. 125648 test-armhf-armhf-xl

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v14 10/11] x86/hvm: Remove redundant save functions

2018-07-31 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 31.07.18 at 15:32, wrote: > On Ma, 2018-07-31 at 07:24 -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: >> > > > On 25.07.18 at 14:14, wrote: >> > --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hpet.c >> > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hpet.c >> > @@ -516,8 +516,9 @@ static const struct hvm_mmio_ops hpet_mmio_ops >> > = { >> > }; >> > >> >

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/4] iommu: generalize iommu_inclusive_mapping

2018-07-31 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 27.07.18 at 17:31, wrote: > Introduce a new iommu=inclusive generic option that supersedes > iommu_inclusive_mapping. This should be a non-functional change on > Intel hardware, while AMD hardware will gain the same functionality of > mapping almost everything below the 4GB boundary. So fi

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 4/4] x86/iommu: add PVH support to the inclusive options

2018-07-31 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 27.07.18 at 17:31, wrote: > Several people have reported hardware issues (malfunctioning USB > controllers) due to iommu page faults. Those faults are caused by > missing RMRR (VTd) or IRVS (AMD-Vi) entries in the ACPI tables. Those > can be worked around on VTd hardware by manually adding

[Xen-devel] [PATCH v3] hvm/altp2m: Clarify the proper way to extend the altp2m interface

2018-07-31 Thread George Dunlap
The altp2m functionality was originally envisioned to be used in several different configurations, one of which was a single in-guest agent that had full operational control of altp2m. This required the single hypercall to be an HVMOP rather than a DOMCTL, since HVM guests are not allowed to make

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3] hvm/altp2m: Clarify the proper way to extend the altp2m interface

2018-07-31 Thread Wei Liu
On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 04:03:31PM +0100, George Dunlap wrote: [...] > > Reviewed-by: Razvan Cojocaru > Signed-off-by: George Dunlap LGTM, FWIW: Acked-by: Wei Liu ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.or

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3] hvm/altp2m: Clarify the proper way to extend the altp2m interface

2018-07-31 Thread Wei Liu
On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 04:03:31PM +0100, George Dunlap wrote: > diff --git a/xen/include/public/hvm/params.h b/xen/include/public/hvm/params.h > index 2ec2e7c80f..daa28a86be 100644 > --- a/xen/include/public/hvm/params.h > +++ b/xen/include/public/hvm/params.h > @@ -239,6 +239,11 @@ > * mixed:

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 4/4] x86/iommu: add PVH support to the inclusive options

2018-07-31 Thread Roger Pau Monné
On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 08:52:14AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 27.07.18 at 17:31, wrote: > > Several people have reported hardware issues (malfunctioning USB > > controllers) due to iommu page faults. Those faults are caused by > > missing RMRR (VTd) or IRVS (AMD-Vi) entries in the ACPI tab

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 4/4] x86/iommu: add PVH support to the inclusive options

2018-07-31 Thread Roger Pau Monné
On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 05:15:22PM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 08:52:14AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > > >>> On 27.07.18 at 17:31, wrote: > > > --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/x86/iommu.c > > > +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/x86/iommu.c > > > @@ -20,6 +20,8 @@ > > > #inclu

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/4] iommu: generalize iommu_inclusive_mapping

2018-07-31 Thread Roger Pau Monné
On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 08:39:22AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 27.07.18 at 17:31, wrote: > > Introduce a new iommu=inclusive generic option that supersedes > > iommu_inclusive_mapping. This should be a non-functional change on > > Intel hardware, while AMD hardware will gain the same functi

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 4/4] x86/iommu: add PVH support to the inclusive options

2018-07-31 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 31.07.18 at 17:15, wrote: > On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 08:52:14AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: >> >>> On 27.07.18 at 17:31, wrote: >> > +/* ... or the PCIe MCFG regions. */ >> > +for ( i = 0; i < pci_mmcfg_config_num; i++ ) >> > +{ >> > +unsigned long addr = PFN_DOWN(pci_mmcf

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 4/4] x86/iommu: add PVH support to the inclusive options

2018-07-31 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 31.07.18 at 17:27, wrote: > On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 05:15:22PM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 08:52:14AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: >> > >>> On 27.07.18 at 17:31, wrote: >> > > --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/x86/iommu.c >> > > +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/x86/iommu

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] tools/gdbsx: fix 'g' packet response for 64bit guests

2018-07-31 Thread Marek Marczykowski
On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 02:01:39AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 31.07.18 at 04:30, wrote: > > Marek, > > looks like all of the patches you've sent early this morning local time > here came through twice on xen-devel: Would you please avoid > having xen-devel on both the To and the Cc lists

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] tools/gdbsx: fix 'g' packet response for 64bit guests

2018-07-31 Thread Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 10:00:24AM +0100, Wei Liu wrote: > On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 04:30:42AM +0200, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > > --- a/tools/debugger/gdbsx/gx/gx_local.c > > +++ b/tools/debugger/gdbsx/gx/gx_local.c > > @@ -45,8 +45,8 @@ prnt_32regs(struct xg_gdb_regs32 *r32p) > > static

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v8 00/11] arm: more kconfig configurability and small default configs

2018-07-31 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Tue, 31 Jul 2018, Julien Grall wrote: > On 30/07/18 18:48, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > Hi all, > > Hi Stefano, > > > > > This patch series is the first step toward building a small certifiable > > Xen hypervisor for ARM boards. > > > > The series makes a few changes to allow disabling more

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] xenconsole: add option to avoid escape sequences in log

2018-07-31 Thread Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 10:10:10AM +0100, Wei Liu wrote: > On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 05:15:32AM +0200, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > > Add --replace-escape option to xenconsoled, which replaces ESC with > > '.' in console output written to log file. This makes it slightly safer > > to do tail -

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] tools/gdbsx: fix 'g' packet response for 64bit guests

2018-07-31 Thread Wei Liu
On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 06:10:07PM +0200, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 10:00:24AM +0100, Wei Liu wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 04:30:42AM +0200, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > > > --- a/tools/debugger/gdbsx/gx/gx_local.c > > > +++ b/tools/debugger/gdbsx/gx/g

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] tools/gdbsx: fix 'g' packet response for 64bit guests

2018-07-31 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 31/07/18 17:10, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 10:00:24AM +0100, Wei Liu wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 04:30:42AM +0200, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: >>> --- a/tools/debugger/gdbsx/gx/gx_local.c >>> +++ b/tools/debugger/gdbsx/gx/gx_local.c >>> @@ -45,8 +45,8

[Xen-devel] [xen-4.6-testing test] 125683: regressions - FAIL

2018-07-31 Thread osstest service owner
flight 125683 xen-4.6-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/125683/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-armhf-armhf-xl-vhd 6 xen-install fail REGR. vs. 124881 Regressions whi

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 0/8] xen: dma-buf support for grant device

2018-07-31 Thread Boris Ostrovsky
On 07/20/2018 05:01 AM, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote: > From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko > > This work is in response to my previous attempt to introduce Xen/DRM > zero-copy driver [1] to enable Linux dma-buf API [2] for Xen based > frontends/backends. There is also an existing hyper_dmabuf approach

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] xen/spinlock: Don't use pvqspinlock if only 1 vCPU

2018-07-31 Thread Boris Ostrovsky
On 07/19/2018 05:39 PM, Waiman Long wrote: > On a VM with only 1 vCPU, the locking fast paths will always be > successful. In this case, there is no need to use the the PV qspinlock > code which has higher overhead on the unlock side than the native > qspinlock code. > > The xen_pvspin veriable is

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][next] xen/gntdev: don't dereference a null gntdev_dmabuf on allocation failure

2018-07-31 Thread Boris Ostrovsky
On 07/31/2018 10:02 AM, Colin King wrote: > From: Colin Ian King > > Currently when the allocation of gntdev_dmabuf fails, the error exit > path will call dmabuf_imp_free_storage and causes a null pointer > dereference on gntdev_dmabuf. Fix this by adding an error exit path > that won't free gntd

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/altp2m: Allow setting the #VE info page for an arbitrary VCPU

2018-07-31 Thread Tamas K Lengyel
On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 5:53 AM Jan Beulich wrote: > > >>> On 25.07.18 at 13:49, wrote: > > --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c > > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c > > @@ -4467,6 +4467,30 @@ static int hvmop_get_param( > > return rc; > > } > > > > +/* > > + * Find the struct vcpu given a dom_id and v

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable-smoke test] 125704: tolerable all pass - PUSHED

2018-07-31 Thread osstest service owner
flight 125704 xen-unstable-smoke real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/125704/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-amd64-amd64-libvirt 13 migrate-support-checkfail never pass test-arm64-arm64-xl-xsm 1

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/altp2m: Allow setting the #VE info page for an arbitrary VCPU

2018-07-31 Thread Razvan Cojocaru
On 07/31/2018 08:19 PM, Tamas K Lengyel wrote: > On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 5:53 AM Jan Beulich wrote: >> I'd like you to outline in the description how you mean an external >> agent to coordinate the use of this GFN with the guest (and in >> particular without in-guest agent). > > Using #VE without

[Xen-devel] [xen-4.7-testing test] 125685: regressions - FAIL

2018-07-31 Thread osstest service owner
flight 125685 xen-4.7-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/125685/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-xtf-amd64-amd64-4 50 xtf/test-hvm64-lbr-tsx-vmentry fail REGR. vs. 125057 test-amd64-i386

  1   2   >