flight 125148 linux-4.14 real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/125148/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-examine 4 memdisk-try-append fail REGR. vs. 125079
test-amd64-amd64-xl-
flight 125177 xen-unstable-coverity real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/125177/
Perfect :-)
All tests in this flight passed as required
version targeted for testing:
xen e3f667bc5f51d0aa44357a64ca134cd952679c81
baseline version:
xen f5d1
flight 125152 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/125152/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 17 guest-stopfail like 124956
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 14 save
flight 125154 libvirt real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/125154/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-arm64-libvirt 6 libvirt-buildfail REGR. vs. 123814
build-i386-libvirt
This run is configured for baseline tests only.
flight 74970 linux-3.18 real [real]
http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/74970/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win10-i386 10 windows-installfail
On Sat, Jul 14, 2018 at 02:25:43AM -0700, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> This patch series is a backport of the Spectre-v2 fixes (IBPB/IBRS)
> and patches for the Speculative Store Bypass vulnerability to 4.4.y
> (they apply cleanly on top of 4.4.140).
>
> I used 4.9.y as my reference whe
flight 125156 linux-4.9 real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/125156/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 16 guest-localmigrate/x10 fail
REGR. vs. 122969
Tests
flight 125181 seabios real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/125181/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 17 guest-stop fail like 124800
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ws16-amd64 17 g
Hello.
Can we see a version of Xen for Windows OS and macOS in the future?
I saw "https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/publication/xen-2002/";. I guess
Microsoft wanted to design an special version of Xen Project for Windows OS.
Thanks.
___
Xen-dev
Hello.
If Xen Project is a type-1 Hypervisor then why it need an OS for doing
Virtualization?
Thanks.
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
This run is configured for baseline tests only.
flight 74971 xen-unstable real [real]
http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/74971/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-3 63 xtf/test-hvm64-
flight 125159 linux-next real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/125159/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 125069
test-amd64-amd64-xl-
This run is configured for baseline tests only.
flight 74972 seabios real [real]
http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/74972/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-qemuu-nested-intel 10 debian-hvm-in
On 2018-07-16 06:40, Jason Long wrote:
Hello.
If Xen Project is a type-1 Hypervisor then why it need an OS for doing
Virtualization?
A quick google search should have pointed you to this:
https://wiki.xenproject.org/wiki/Dom0
--
Steven Haigh
? net...@crc.id.au ? http://www.crc.id.au
?
flight 125194 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/125194/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64-xsm 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 125151
build-amd64
flight 125197 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/125197/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64-xsm 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 125151
build-amd64
flight 125160 qemu-upstream-4.9-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/125160/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 17 guest-stopfail like 116750
test-armhf-armhf-xl-rtd
Hi Stewart,
Thank you for your support. I solved the error by installing
libpixman-1:arm64. Previously I have installed libpixman-1 for x86. I think
that was the problem.
Thanks and Regards,
George
On Jul 14, 2018 2:41 AM, "Stewart Hildebrand" <
stewart.hildebr...@dornerworks.com> wrote:
> > ---
flight 125202 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/125202/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64-xsm 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 125151
build-amd64
flight 125161 xen-4.11-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/125161/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-dmrestrict-amd64-dmrestrict 10 debian-hvm-install
fail never pass
test-amd64-i386-xl
>>> On 13.07.18 at 19:15, wrote:
> On 13/07/18 15:27, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 13.07.18 at 15:39, wrote:
>>> On 13/07/18 14:27, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 13.07.18 at 15:00, wrote:
> What would be the generic interface here? I saw it was based on
> alternative for the plumbing.
>>>
flight 125206 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/125206/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64-xsm 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 125151
build-amd64
22 matches
Mail list logo
