flight 120388 rumprun real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/120388/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i386-rumprun6 rumprun-buildfail REGR. vs. 106754
build-amd64-rumprun
flight 120380 linux-4.1 real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/120380/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-arm64-pvops 6 kernel-build fail REGR. vs. 118294
build-i386-pvops
flight 120455 xen-unstable-coverity real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/120455/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
coverity-amd647 coverity-upload fail REGR. vs. 119558
version t
flight 120376 qemu-mainline real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/120376/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-qemuu-nested-intel 14 xen-boot/l1 fail REGR. vs. 120095
test-amd64-amd64-
> -Original Message-
> From: George Dunlap [mailto:george.dun...@citrix.com]
> Sent: 09 March 2018 18:04
> To: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
> Cc: George Dunlap ; Ian Jackson
> ; Wei Liu ; Andrew Cooper
> ; Jan Beulich ; Tim
> (Xen.org) ; Konrad Wilk ; Stefano
> Stabellini ; Julien Grall ;
flight 120378 libvirt real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/120378/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-libvirt-xsm 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 120326
Tests which did not suc
Hi Amit,
On 03/10/2018 04:44 PM, Amit Singh Tomar wrote:
This patch-set is an attempt to enable XEN on ESPRESSObin[1] based on
Marvell's ARMADA 3700 SoC
Thank you for adding support to boot Xen on that board!
Would you mind creating a page on Xen wiki to explain how to boot Xen on
that board
Hi,
On 03/10/2018 04:44 PM, Amit Singh Tomar wrote:
This patch adds driver for UART controller found on Armada 3700 SoC.
OOI, do you have any plan for adding earlyprintk support for that platform?
There is no reference manuals available for 3700 SoC in public and this
driver is derived by l
Hi Andrew,
On 03/02/2018 05:09 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 02/03/18 17:05, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 02/03/18 17:51, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 02.03.18 at 17:25, wrote:
On 02/03/18 16:18, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 02.03.18 at 17:04, wrote:
The proper way to do this is indeed by a nominated (guest)
Hi Juergen,
On 03/02/2018 05:25 PM, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 02/03/18 18:09, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 02/03/18 17:05, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 02/03/18 17:51, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 02.03.18 at 17:25, wrote:
On 02/03/18 16:18, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 02.03.18 at 17:04, wrote:
The proper way to
Hi Wei,
On 03/09/2018 05:29 PM, Wei Liu wrote:
On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 07:38:36AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 05.03.18 at 15:11, wrote:
On 05/03/18 14:00, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 05.03.18 at 14:43, wrote:
Anyway, I don't have much knowledge on the x86 to make the modification
that you sugge
Hi,
On 03/09/2018 05:33 PM, Wei Liu wrote:
On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 07:41:54AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 05.03.18 at 15:18, wrote:
On 02/03/18 15:34, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 21.02.18 at 15:02, wrote:
@@ -95,11 +101,18 @@ static unsigned int max_order(const struct domain *d)
return m
Hi Andrew,
On 03/09/2018 01:18 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
ARM guests are HVM and have hardware assisted paging. There are no PV guests
or shadow paging, and all other creation flags are x86 specific.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper
---
CC: Stefano Stabellini
CC: Julien Grall
CC: Ian Jackson
CC:
Hi Andre,
On 03/09/2018 01:18 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
With DOMCRF_dummy removed, all remaining DOMCRF_* idenitcally match their
NIT: s/idenitcally/identically/
DOMCTL counterparts. Avoid having a conversion between two different bit
layouts, and use the DOMCTL_CDF_* constants everywhere.
Hi Andrew,
On 03/09/2018 01:18 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
At the moment, there is a tight coupling between the domid and the use of
DOMCRF_dummy. Instead of using DOMCRF_dummy, base the one relevent decision
NIT: s/relevent/relevant/
on domid alone.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper
Acked-by:
Hi Andrew,
On 03/09/2018 01:18 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
In future patches, the structure will be extended with further information,
and this is far cleaner than adding extra parameters.
One minor tweak is that the setting of guest_type needs to be deferred until
config is known-good to derefere
Hi Andrew,
On 03/09/2018 01:18 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
The share_xen_page_with_guest() functions are used by common code, and are
implemented the same by each arch. Move the declarations into the common mm.h
rather than duplicating them in each arch/mm.h
Turn an int readonly into a boolean en
On Fri, 9 Mar 2018, George Dunlap wrote:
> All this information is now covered in SUPPORT.md.
>
> Most of the emulated hardware is obvious a couple of the items are
> worth pointing out specifically.
>
> "xen_disk" is listed under "Blkback"
>
> "...the PCI host bridge and the PIIX3 chipset...":
On Wed, 7 Mar 2018, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 06.03.18 at 20:24, wrote:
> > On Tue, 6 Mar 2018, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> these stable releases should go out before the end of the month.
> >> Please point out backport candidates you find missing from the
> >> respective staging branches, but which
reping
On Mon, 5 Mar 2018, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> ping?
>
> On Tue, 27 Feb 2018, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > Add pvcalls support to libxl and xl. Create the appropriate pvcalls
> > entries in xenstore.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini
> >
> > diff --git a/docs/misc/xenstore-pat
Hi,
sorry for the long latency.
On Wed, 07 Mar 2018 09:49:24 +0100,
Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
>
> > Suppose that we negotiate from the frontend to the backend like
> >
> > int query_hw_param(int parm, int *min_p, int *max_p);
> >
> > so that you can call like
> > err = query_hw_para
On Thu, 8 Mar 2018, Igor Druzhinin wrote:
> This should help to avoid problems with accessing the device after
> migration/resume without PV drivers. Older systems will acquire
> the new record when migrated which should not change their state for
> worse.
Could you please explain what problems th
On Fri, 9 Mar 2018, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 12:07:21PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Ian Jackson writes ("Re: [PATCH 03/11] xen: defer call to xen_restrict
> > until just before os_setup_post"):
> > > Eduardo Habkost writes ("Re: [PATCH 03/11] xen: defer call to
> > > xen
flight 120393 seabios real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/120393/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ws16-amd64 17 guest-stop fail REGR. vs. 115539
Tests which did not suc
> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 9, 2018 10:19 PM
>
> Instead of "syncing" the live value to what mmu_cr4_features has, make
> sure vCPU-s run with the value most recently loaded into %cr4, such that
> after the next VM exit we continue to run with the intended
branch xen-unstable
xenbranch xen-unstable
job build-arm64-pvops
testid kernel-build
Tree: linux
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git
Tree: linuxfirmware git://xenbits.xen.org/osstest/linux-firmware.git
*** Found and reproduced problem changeset ***
Bug is in
flight 120385 xen-4.9-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/120385/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-armhf 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 12
test-amd64-i386
On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 02:40:25PM +, Julien Grall wrote:
>Hi,
>
>On 09/03/18 13:30, Peng Fan wrote:
>>Hi Julien,
>>On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 10:22:09AM +, Julien Grall wrote:
>>>Hi Peng,
>>>
>>>On 09/03/18 09:05, Peng Fan wrote:
On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 03:13:50PM +, Julien Grall wrot
Hi Stefano,
On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 05:09:20PM -0800, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>On Fri, 9 Mar 2018, Julien Grall wrote:
>> Furthermore, the workaround is not in Linux upstream and I doubt this will be
>> accepted as it is. So I am not convinced that we should modify Xen interface
>> for that.
>>
On 10 March 2018 at 23:23, Manish Jaggi wrote:
> Hi Sameer,
>
>
>
> On 02/09/2018 08:40 AM, Sameer Goel wrote:
>>
>> This driver follows an approach similar to smmu driver. The intent here
>> is to reuse as much Linux code as possible.
>> - Glue code has been introduced to bridge the API calls.
>>
flight 120391 xen-4.8-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/120391/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-5 50 xtf/test-hvm64-lbr-tsx-vmentry fail REGR. vs. 120116
Tests which are
If you are working on commercial, academic or open-source projects which use
OpenXT, Xen Project or OpenEmbedded to implement platform components with
well-defined security properties, you are invited to present at Platform
Security Summit 2018, which will take place on May 23-24 in Fairfax, VA,
branch xen-unstable
xenbranch xen-unstable
job build-i386-rumprun
testid rumprun-build
Tree: qemu git://xenbits.xen.org/qemu-xen-traditional.git
Tree: qemuu git://xenbits.xen.org/qemu-xen.git
Tree: rumprun https://github.com/rumpkernel/rumprun
Tree: rumprun_buildrumpsh https://github.com/rumpkerne
branch xen-4.10-testing
xenbranch xen-4.10-testing
job build-armhf
testid xen-build
Tree: qemuu git://xenbits.xen.org/qemu-xen.git
Tree: xen git://xenbits.xen.org/xen.git
*** Found and reproduced problem changeset ***
Bug is in tree: xen git://xenbits.xen.org/xen.git
Bug introduced: da3a46
On 03/11/2018 10:15 AM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
Hi,
sorry for the long latency.
Hi, no problem, thank you
On Wed, 07 Mar 2018 09:49:24 +0100,
Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
Suppose that we negotiate from the frontend to the backend like
int query_hw_param(int parm, int *min_p, int *max_
>>> Wei Liu 03/09/18 6:30 PM >>>
>On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 07:38:36AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 05.03.18 at 15:11, wrote:
>> > On 05/03/18 14:00, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> > On 05.03.18 at 14:43, wrote:
>> >>> Anyway, I don't have much knowledge on the x86 to make the modification
>> >>
>>> Julien Grall 03/11/18 8:44 PM >>>
>On 03/09/2018 05:33 PM, Wei Liu wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 07:41:54AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 05.03.18 at 15:18, wrote:
Also, do you have an opinion on Wei's suggestion:
"What I meant was to make copy_{to,from}_guest* type-s
37 matches
Mail list logo
