On 18.08.2021 16:15, Paul Durrant wrote:
> On 18/08/2021 13:09, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 18.08.2021 12:51, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> back at the time I did already question your intended meaning of
>>> this flag. I notice that there's presently no consumer of it being
>>> set (apart from yielding non-
On 18/08/2021 13:09, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 18.08.2021 12:51, Jan Beulich wrote:
Paul,
back at the time I did already question your intended meaning of
this flag. I notice that there's presently no consumer of it being
set (apart from yielding non-zero flush_flags). I'm afraid this
model makes a
On 18.08.2021 12:51, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Paul,
>
> back at the time I did already question your intended meaning of
> this flag. I notice that there's presently no consumer of it being
> set (apart from yielding non-zero flush_flags). I'm afraid this
> model makes accumulation of flush flags not
Paul,
back at the time I did already question your intended meaning of
this flag. I notice that there's presently no consumer of it being
set (apart from yielding non-zero flush_flags). I'm afraid this
model makes accumulation of flush flags not work properly: With
both flags set and more than a s
