On 25.08.2020 04:30, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 1:23 AM Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 21.08.2020 09:38, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>>> I think we're talking slightly past each other here -- you seem to be
>>> more after trying to figure out how to make this box look like a dozen
>>>
On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 1:23 AM Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> On 21.08.2020 09:38, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 11:47 PM Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> On 20.08.2020 21:31, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> >>> Well, default is overloaded. What I would like to see (and consider it
> >>> a void o
On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 3:11 AM Andrew Cooper wrote:
>
> On 21/08/2020 07:50, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > On 20.08.2020 21:12, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> >> On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 5:56 AM Andrew Cooper
> >> wrote:
> >>> On 19/08/2020 23:50, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Hi!
>
> below you
On 21/08/2020 07:50, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 20.08.2020 21:12, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 5:56 AM Andrew Cooper
>> wrote:
>>> On 19/08/2020 23:50, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
Hi!
below you can see a trace of Xen 4.14.0 failing on Dell IoT Gateway 3001
with
On 21.08.2020 09:38, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 11:47 PM Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 20.08.2020 21:31, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>>> Well, default is overloaded. What I would like to see (and consider it
>>> a void of a small downstream/distro) is a community-agreed and
>>> maint
On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 11:47 PM Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> On 20.08.2020 21:31, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 1:34 AM Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> On 20.08.2020 00:50, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> >>> (XEN) Unknown cachability for MFNs 0xff900-0xf
> >>
> >> The fault address fallin
On 20.08.2020 21:12, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 5:56 AM Andrew Cooper
> wrote:
>>
>> On 19/08/2020 23:50, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> below you can see a trace of Xen 4.14.0 failing on Dell IoT Gateway 3001
>>> without efi=no-rs. Please let me know if I can pro
On 20.08.2020 21:31, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 1:34 AM Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 20.08.2020 00:50, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>>> (XEN) Unknown cachability for MFNs 0xff900-0xf
>>
>> The fault address falling in this range suggests you can use a less
>> heavy workaround: "e
On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 6:10 AM Rich Persaud wrote:
>
> On Aug 20, 2020, at 07:24, George Dunlap wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 9:35 AM Jan Beulich wrote:
>>
>>
>> As far as making cases like this work by default, I'm afraid it'll
>> need to be proposed to replace me as the maintainer
On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 1:34 AM Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> On 20.08.2020 00:50, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> > below you can see a trace of Xen 4.14.0 failing on Dell IoT Gateway 3001
> > without efi=no-rs. Please let me know if I can provide any additional
> > information.
>
> One of the usual firmware
On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 5:56 AM Andrew Cooper wrote:
>
> On 19/08/2020 23:50, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > below you can see a trace of Xen 4.14.0 failing on Dell IoT Gateway 3001
> > without efi=no-rs. Please let me know if I can provide any additional
> > information.
>
> Just to be
On 19/08/2020 23:50, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Hi!
>
> below you can see a trace of Xen 4.14.0 failing on Dell IoT Gateway 3001
> without efi=no-rs. Please let me know if I can provide any additional
> information.
Just to be able to get all datapoints, could you build Xen with
CONFIG_EFI_SET_VIR
On Aug 20, 2020, at 07:24, George Dunlap wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 9:35 AM Jan Beulich wrote:
>
>>
>> As far as making cases like this work by default, I'm afraid it'll
>> need to be proposed to replace me as the maintainer of EFI code in
>> Xen. I will remain on the position that i
On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 9:35 AM Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> As far as making cases like this work by default, I'm afraid it'll
> need to be proposed to replace me as the maintainer of EFI code in
> Xen. I will remain on the position that it is not acceptable to
> apply workarounds for firmware issues
On 20.08.2020 00:50, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> below you can see a trace of Xen 4.14.0 failing on Dell IoT Gateway 3001
> without efi=no-rs. Please let me know if I can provide any additional
> information.
One of the usual firmware issues:
> Xen 4.14.0
> (XEN) Xen version 4.14.0 (@) (gcc (Alpine
Hi!
below you can see a trace of Xen 4.14.0 failing on Dell IoT Gateway 3001
without efi=no-rs. Please let me know if I can provide any additional
information.
One interesting point is that even though Xen tries to reboot the box in 5
seconds
it simply freezes it completely.
Thanks,
Roman.
Xen
16 matches
Mail list logo
