Re: preparations for 4.14.1

2020-11-06 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Fri, 6 Nov 2020, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 06.11.2020 02:58, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > On Wed, 4 Nov 2020, Jan Beulich wrote: > >> the release is due in a couple of weeks time. Please point out > >> backports you find missing from the respective staging branch, > >> but which you consider rele

Re: preparations for 4.14.1

2020-11-06 Thread Jan Beulich
On 06.11.2020 09:45, Julien Grall wrote: > On 04/11/2020 10:12, Jan Beulich wrote: >> the release is due in a couple of weeks time. Please point out >> backports you find missing from the respective staging branch, >> but which you consider relevant. (Ian: Please double check >> there are indeed no

Re: preparations for 4.14.1

2020-11-06 Thread Julien Grall
On 04/11/2020 10:12, Jan Beulich wrote: All, Hi Jan, the release is due in a couple of weeks time. Please point out backports you find missing from the respective staging branch, but which you consider relevant. (Ian: Please double check there are indeed no tools side backports needed her

Re: preparations for 4.14.1

2020-11-05 Thread Jan Beulich
On 06.11.2020 02:58, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Wed, 4 Nov 2020, Jan Beulich wrote: >> the release is due in a couple of weeks time. Please point out >> backports you find missing from the respective staging branch, >> but which you consider relevant. (Ian: Please double check >> there are inde

Re: preparations for 4.14.1

2020-11-05 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Wed, 4 Nov 2020, Jan Beulich wrote: > All, > > the release is due in a couple of weeks time. Please point out > backports you find missing from the respective staging branch, > but which you consider relevant. (Ian: Please double check > there are indeed no tools side backports needed here.) >

Re: preparations for 4.14.1

2020-11-04 Thread Jason Andryuk
On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 5:13 AM Jan Beulich wrote: > > All, > > the release is due in a couple of weeks time. Please point out > backports you find missing from the respective staging branch, > but which you consider relevant. (Ian: Please double check > there are indeed no tools side backports nee